Why Not to Pay College Athletes
After numerous scandals over the past several years of college athletes receiving improper benefits, the question has come up whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. College sports are a growing industry, and we have seen money destroy organizations, teams, and players in this industry. The determination and motivation of college athletes supersedes professional athletes by their will to win; therefore, college athletes should not be paid.
The law that prevents college athletes from receiving money is called Title IX. Title IX was passed in 1972, and states that all money should go equally for all sports and no team should be excluded. Originally this law was created to preserve equal rights for men and women. These days, the NCAA enforces this law to prevent athletes from receiving money. An example of this is the scandal that recently occurred at Miami University. Over seventy-two athletes at Miami University received improper benefits while attending the college. Now, several years later, the university is under investigation and will be facing some serious punishment from the NCAA.
Before the Title IX was passed, only 1 out of 27 women in college played sports. During this period of time scholarships for women were not often received. Since this law has been passed, more and more women have been given the opportunity to fulfill their dreams of playing college sports. “In 2006 -2007 there were 3 million girls participating in high school athletics. They made up 41% of high school athletes, even though they represent more than 49% of the high school student population.“ (Nelson 1). This shows how greatly this law effects college sports. By making it illegal to receive improper benefits, Title IX keeps colleges and universities from giving unfair advantages to their student athletes. Title IX has made a significant impact in many lives by preventing improper benefits from diminishing equality in college sports.
If college students were to be paid, smaller universities and colleges would have an extreme disadvantage. Larger universities bring in a lot more money on average and would be able to pay a lot more to go out and recruit athletes, while smaller schools would be on a much tighter budget to. If this were to happen, almost all high school prospects would end up at the larger universities from being drawn in by a paycheck. This could severely affect how well smaller schools compete in college sports. A lot of college athletes believe that they deserve to be paid, but in a lot of cases they sort of already are. College athletes who receive a scholarship to a university are saving themselves and their families an enormous amount of money. “Most do so while playing the sport they love and preparing for a future as a professional in something other than sports. Many receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be worth more than $100,000.”(NCAA 1). Leaving college without debt is a huge benefit that college athletes have over every other college student, and it is all thanks to scholarships. If we were to start paying athletes directly, would they use the money for school? Not everyone makes it to the pros, and getting a college degree is a great plan to fall back on. Many college students finish school with a huge debt that will take them many years to pay off. The average student today after college moves back home for a few years trying to pay off their student loans that college athletes don’t have to deal with. During the college year, college athletes are also given the benefits of traveling, choosing schedules earlier, being excused from class, and becoming well known. For a college athlete to ask for more money based off the amount of things they already receive is just selfish. They have the life already and keep asking for more. With these benefits it would be a ridiculous to pay a college athlete on top of all the money they are...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document