Preview

What Is The Trail Of Tears

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Trail Of Tears
On August 1838, the journey of Cherokees began in what was known to history as the Trail of Tears. The Trail of tears involved thirteen parties of the Cherokee being forced by U.S. army troop under Andrew Jackson presidency to leave their residence in the southeast and migrate to the west. The discovery of gold in northern Georgia in 1828 and compulsion for the accessibility of more land to settle the growing white population contributed to more local delirium for the Indian dismissal. With the Election of Andrew Johnson – a man known for his believe that Native Americans had no legitimate titles to their lands and should be removed from them, congress voted in 1830 the Indian removal bill. Notwithstanding, during this period, a heated debate …show more content…
The proposition calling for equal rights and political democracy of the inhabitants of America were in confutation with the principles calling for the US to follow colonial principles of the European empires that had begun to invade North America in the late 1400s. The colonies that had revolted against British rule in the late 1700s had continued the expansion of settlements and political incorporation that had been practiced since the founding of colonies at Jamestown and Plymouth. The proposal of Indian Removal debated in the US Congress was a straightforward expression of that same expansionism, which dispensed with the past policies of the US that had combined expansion with treaty negotiations that had the form of a meeting and agreements of equals, and proclamations of Indian rights and sovereignty. There was a national campaign developed in support of the Indian resistance, particularly from the Cherokee, that involved diatribes and petitions, public meetings and Congressional debates. The opposition to Removal was advancing principles that in effect called for the US to develop practical policy that was in line with its past proclamations that upheld its treaty commitments to the Indian communities. The proponents of Removal, supporting a campaign of the state of Georgia to dispossess and expel Indian, in their own view advanced …show more content…
His first annual message to congress were based on where elements of stepped up pressure against the Indian communities in the eastern US (Wheeler 187). He explained here that Indian communities are obstacle to American expansion because they practiced a form of independent government. He also induced that if the Indians wanted to remain in the limits of the states they must abide by the laws of the states. On the other hand, he stated that if they remain within the state and do not abide by these laws, a fate of persuasion by force awaits them. To Wilson Lumpkin, the situation in the 1820s was a crisis caused by the impediments to Georgia’s growth in all aspects (Wheeler 195). He believed that the needs of economic and social progress clearly could not be met while Indian communities claimed so much sovereignty over the lands they which they haven’t dwelt nor made improvements. He therefore suggested that absolute power should be made to enforce their requirements. Also, a supporter of the Indian removal was Elias Boudinot though he was Indian, argued that Indians could not exist amidst a white population, subject to laws which they were not involved in making, and which they do not understand, laws that suppresses their Cherokee government which connects them (Wheeler 202). He also asserts that the Cherokees opposed because they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ¨All men are created equal,¨ according to the Declaration of Independence. But, based on the government’s actions, this was not the case when it came to Indian Removal. When the government issued the Indian Removal act in 1830, there were two clear sides: one that supported it, and one that despised it. After the Supreme Court ruled against it, the wrongness of it became manifest. However, it still continued. The United States was not justified in enabling the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trail of Tears

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author, Dee Brown, gives a brief description about Andrew Jackson’s policy on Indian removal in order to gain popularity and power. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the cause and effects of “Indian Removal” during Jackson’s terms, ultimately creating the “Trail of Tears.” As early as the colonial period Indian removal was evident, Brown claims. Indians never really got along with white settlers, and even if they tried to resolve the conflicts, it would fail. Indian Removal calmed down over time but in 1828, Andrew Jackson ran for president and immediately knew he would have to wipe out the frontier states. He made a treaty in which the Indians had to remove themselves from the states and move west toward the Mississippi. On there “trip” to the Mississippi, Indians faced many hardships that included starvation, death, and disease.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States took possession of numerous Indians lands after the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus. They claimed those lands of America using the Christendom’s theory stating that Christian’s nations have an absolute domination over non-Christians territories. Plenty of Acts and Treaties were also used to whitewash this doctrine of domination; the Indian Removal Act in 1835well illustrates this “whitewash” practice. Originally intended to create pace and to ensure the integrity of Indians territories, the Removal Act created multiple conflicts in between Indians and Christian’s communities and resulted in the removal of the Indians people from their own homeland, as a result of the Americans ‘desire to conquer the Indians territories. Furthermore, the United States categorized the Indian people as “domestic dependent nations” and also as “migratory hunters” with no attachment to their homelands, therefore the lands of America were supposedly uninhabited and available for Christians ‘nations to govern.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson was the one who made this removal. He called it the Indian Removal. In 1830, the Indian Removal act was signed. Native Americans were forced to leave their lands. The Choctaw was the first one forced to leave. Thousands of people died. The removal kept on going.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    interests was the attempt by the Cherokee tribe to rewrite their laws according to U.S. laws. Where before the Cherokee were fragmented, the Cherokee National Council declared that the Cherokee people were an independent nation and could rule over their own territories. To resist white claims over Cherokee land, the council passed an 1829 law that required the consent of tribal leaders for land to be transferred to a white settler. This helped to ensure that individual Indian land owners were not unduly taken advantage of without the rest of the tribe's knowledge, and the chance to stop the land from being ceded. Native Americans consistently resisted the expansion of settlers West once it was clear that their territory was being encroached on by the U.S.…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The path the cherokee followed became a national monument in 1987, because of the misfigured pursuit of the indians and how they suffered. The story of the trail of tears is part of american indian history. Throughout the past 200 years, tribes have been educated all too well that acceptance of their dominance starts from scratch with each new presidential administration . The trail of tears point out the route displaced by 15 thousand cherokees during their 1838 deportation and forced to walk from georgia to indian territory (present day oklahoma). in 1971, a u.s. Treaty had recognized cherokee territory in georgia as independent, and the cherokee territory in georgia as independent, and the cherokee people had created a thriving republic…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal In 1828, Andrew Jackson was presented as president. He wanted to remove Indians to have more land for the white people. When Jackson wanted to remove the Indians most cooperated, but not the Cherokee Indians. The Cherokee Indians refused to leave their land.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less then respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history. The US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. In this essay I will explain why and how the Native Americans were treated by the United States’ government, in which way were the treaties broken and how the Native nation were affected by the 19th century happenings. I will focus mostly on the Cherokee Indians.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    trail of tears

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How do you feel about The Trail of Tears? Do you support the removal of Indians? In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. Indian tribes were forced to move from their homelands to the Indian Territory. On their journeys to the Indian Territory, the Indians faced exposure, disease, and starvation. Many died on their journeys. The Native Americans began to call this trail "The Trail of Tears." In my opinion, the Trail of Tears was a very despondent event in history. I do not support the removal of Indians.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trail Of Tears History

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many believed this was a humane solution since the Cherokee could avoid the ever growing encroachment of white settlers (Magliocca 891). However, this law was widely debated due to the question of whether states had the constitutional right to extend their laws over Indians, because it would conflict with treaties that guaranteed Indian sovereignty (Davis 55). Nevertheless, after much debate, Andrew Jackson was able to get congress to pass the Indian Removal Act on May 28, 1930.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays