What Are The Three Key Elements Of Leadership Philosophy

Leadership /Command Philosophy and Interview Paper

By

Drew Spears

Applied Leadership and Command

Section 19

19 Apr 2017

This is the first of many papers that will be written in the Air Command Staff College that will be written. I will be covering topics as senior leadership states about themselves. The topics will cover three key elements: leadership philosophy, the commander’s interview and an analysis of the senior leadership philosophy as a guide. The senior leadership I will be interviewing will be a director for aviation maintenance with over 40 years of maintenance experience in the aviation field. This individual has a broad background starting with the aircraft engine shop floor as a mechanic and rising
He has seen a variety of different leadership styles and management. He had to develop his own way of leadership and directing. He took notes and directions from previous managers that inspired him along with the core values and attitude to continually praise his subordinates in the public eye and critiquing them behind closed doors. During the interview the director recalls not every manager, he served under was faultless, but they had one goal in common be straightforward with your subordinates. With this in mind and given the squadrons, the transparency and a vision would assist in promoting a harmony to all individuals he could appreciate. To be a director of a maintenance squadron would include an assortment of responsibilities. Develop policies and procedures, annual operating budgets that would include operating expenses, training, awards and punishments just to name a few. There would also be senior level meetings to manage and worries that would extend beyond the maintenance shops. Some core values the director was particular fond of were integrity, he hopes all senior leadership would display the same. If the moral characters of standards are not met, then the judgment should be in question. The other core values are service before self and excellence in all we do can be used to demonstrate how much determination a director actually has. For example, staying past normal duty time,
If the task is to be completed in a specific manner and by a particular date, the supervisor should be clear about any special instructions at the time of commitment. When integrity is involved the supervisor should accomplish the tasks on the agreed date. If the task cannot be accomplished by the agreed date, the supervisor will need to adjust the suspense date. The supervisor has the capability to change the dates as soon as possible. The director has accountability, integrity and trust in the supervisor to keep him abreast of the entire situation. If the subordinate has less than average integrity, the supervisor may not have information referencing any issues until the suspense date has expired, this has tendencies to cause a delay in the repair. The fragmented agreement and lack of accountability can be detrimental and have future lapses for team commitments. Accountability and reliability throughout any organization can be dominating issues in its