Preview

What Are The Differences Between The Patricians And Plebeians?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Differences Between The Patricians And Plebeians?
Introduction

The Patricians and Plebeians were inhabitants of the Roman state, yet each enjoyed completely different privileges. The Patricians descended from the old Roman families, who were the original inhabitants of Rome and were therefore superior in terms of the authority they possessed and the power they wielded. The Plebeians on the other hand were Roman subjects. People who were not members of the old Roman families, and therefore had no say in governmental affairs. The Plebeians had come to inhabit Rome, largely as conquered people or being escapees from other cities (Morey, 1901).

Although Tarquinius Priscus, the first Etruscan king, took it upon himself to introduce plebeians into the state, it was still a great number of years
…show more content…
Rome had succeeded in abolishing the tyrannical rule of the kings and became a republic, yet she was more of an aristocratic republic. Her power rested more in a particular class than in the whole people (Morey, 1901).

This difference in political power between the classes subtly boiled over into what would become a plebeian revolt. At first the conflict was based more on the fact that the Patricians were a wealthier class, and the Plebeians seeked an equal distribution of wealth (Morey, 1901).

Due to the fact that the homes of the plebeians were in the country, they were much more prone to being destroyed by the enemy during the war, or being neglected as they would be away to war. During these times their families were driven away, and thus they were reduced to extreme poverty. (Morey,
…show more content…
Another unfair circumstance that the Plebeians found themselves in, was in the unjust distribution of land acquired during the war. The Patricians who were in charge of the government would hold it and rent it out to their own.

Because it was public land, and could not be sold by the occupants, the occupants would look at it as if it belonged to them. In this way the Plebeians were deprived of land they also fought for.

It was especially the law regarding debt that ultimately drove the Plebeians to revolt. They decided that they would not fight in the army anymore. They marched to the Sacred Mount and wanted to form an independent city.

This action by the Plebeians put the Patricians in a vulnerable state, as they could not fight their battles by themselves. Therefore they had to concede to some demands of the Plebeians.

As a result of the revolt Plebeian debt of all who were insolvent was cancelled, and those imprisoned because of debt were released. However, most importantly, a new office was created, called the tribune of the people (Morey,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Conflict of Orders- Patricians vs. Plebeians became a fight between the rich wealthy class and the majority peasant class |…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1020 Ch

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9. Who did Rome fight in the Punic Wars? (What was the name of their enemy?)…

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Colonial American society was becoming less equal in the sense that the only real participants were a handful of rich aristocrats. And although being the smaller percentage of the population, they still ran the governments. The difference in the social ladder was divided between the Aristocratic and rich, and the slaves, servants, and Indians. The higher class was determined to create a large division between the two…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The search for land is primarily what led conflict of the upper and lower classes and ultimately the rebellion. As life expectancy rose and people came pouring into Virginia the availability of good land dropped dramatically. The aristocracy seeing an opportunity to make a profit bought up most of best land creating "artificial scarcity". Only a few lucky freed men could find small plots of land. Without land of there own, colonists could not hope to achieve financial…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the Second Punic War, the Senate became the supreme power and as a result, many changes occurred throughout Rome. The ruling Oligarchy abused their power, caring more for their own material interests than the welfare of the republic. As a result major problems occurred throughout Rome. Serious economic social problems occurred, both rural and urban, causing grave distress among many Roman citizens. There was a military crisis, with lack of eligible recruits for the legions, aggravated by the Spanish and Sicilian wars. There was tension in the oligarchy between leading factions as they struggled for political superiority. And amongst all these problems was the failure of the ruling nobility within the senate to deal with these problems.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What taxes were placed on the Colonists? Do you think the British had the right to tax the…

    • 439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This land connected these people to Rome. It provided a bond much stronger than just citizenship alone. It gave a majority of the population something to fight for; something to defend; something to inherit and to leave to their children. The replacement of this peasantry class by the latifundia's of the wealthy started the crumbling of the Republic. Plutarch writes that "the poor, who had been ejected from their land, no longer showed themselves eager for military service, and neglected the bringing up of children, so that soon all Italy was filled with gangs of foreign slaves, by whose aid the rich cultivated their estates, from which they had driven away the free citizens." Similarly, Appian comments that "certain powerful men became extremely rich and the race of slaves multiplied throughout the country, while the Italian people dwindled in numbers and strength, being oppressed by penury, taxes, and military service."…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even in the countryside, there were similar conflicts of rich against poor. Several riots in the New York/Jersey area were more than riots but long lasting social movements to create counter governments. Rioters were breaking into jails and freeing their friends. Soon however, the lower-classmen started to turn to the British for support against the rich colonists. With the…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Rome Fall Essay

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rise of taxes wasn’t easy on anyone. Taxes made most of the peasants’ day to day lives difficult to live. There was really no way for them to escape the taxes, which forced them to give themselves to others and work as slaves. Slaves became very important to rich people because they would do things that needed to be done. They would take care of the fields and the crops, and they would also take…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into the Wild: Vocabulary

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    altruistic- unselfishly concerned for or devoted to the welfare of others ( opposed to egoistic ).…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 101

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages

    In their struggle with the patricians, Roman ______________________employed which of the following tactics: a physical withdrawal from the state undercutting its military manpower and the formation of popular assemblies to lobby for more political reforms.…

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the colonists were unhappy with the outcome of the war and disagreed with the proclamation of 1763. “Colonists believed that they had the right to the land and many ignored the proclamation.” (Economic factors leading to the American Revolution, paragraph 2). This made the colonists angry because they believed that the Indians were Savages and did not deserve the land. Also, because It was good farming land the colonists needed it to expand their profit distribute to the…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays