Preview

Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Justified

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
312 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Justified
In the short story “the most dangerous game” Rainsford was justified in killing general Zaroff.
Rainsford was a writer and a hunter and he was on a boat they were near by a island called “ship wreak island” they crashed but only few died but Rainsford was the only one to live after the terrible ship wreak Rainsford swam to the island than he found a house but it was more a big one than he went there wondering is anyone was there and that where he met general zaroff,zaroff was also a hunter but he hunted all his life but all a sudden he started to bore hunting so zaroff made a new game that hunted men zaroff tried to make Rainsford see a liking to the game but Rainsford refused than zaroff put Rainsford into the game by force

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a lot of simalaritys and difference between the two characters, M0ntresor in the cask of allmontiallo and General Zaroff in the most dangerous game. Montresor had his murder all planned out includeing every small detail. General Zaroff had never even planned on killing Rainsford because rainsford appeared out of nowhere to him and Zaroff wanted to hunt with Rainsford not hunt him. The reason Zaroff wanted to hunt Rainsford was because Rinsford refused to hunt with him.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford.”... “He had never slept in a better bed”. (Connell 41) There were some of last few sentences of the story provided a somewhat cryptic ending. This meant that Rainsford had beat Zaroff. Since Zaroff was beat by Rainsford he won his bed. This also means Rainsford has won the hunt and is finally free and does not have to worry about hunting humans or ever being the prey again. The ending didn't tell you a lot, but told you some main things so you know and can put together with what happened next. All of these quotes explain how Rainsford outsmarted Zaroff and won “The Most Dangerous Game.”…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are two main characters in the story “The Most Dangerous Game.” Rainsford and Zaroff encounter each other when Rainsford was on his yacht headed to hunt in Rio. He falls over board and ends up on an island and the only house on the island belongs to General Zaroff. Zaroff invites Rainsford into his home and is a very good host to him. He offers him food, clothing, and a place to rest, but little does Rainsford know, Zaroff has another plan for him. Zaroff plans to kill him by sending him out to play a “game”. These two characters have many differences, but the also have their similarities.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford, a once savvy, avid hunter, uses his witty instincts to defeat General Zaroff at his own game.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead/Quote - On Shiptrap island, Rainsford is being hunted by Zarroff, a Russian, peculiar, eerie, skilled hunter that lost interest in hunting animals; therefore, he went hunting humans, and got his hounds to hunt Rainsford all while, “He caught hold of a young springy sapling and to it he fastened his hunting knife, with the blade pointing down the trail; with a bit of wild grapevine he tied back the sapling. Then he ran for his life. The hounds raised their voices…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two characters, Rainsford and Zaroff, contrast from each other because they come from different countries of origin. Once Rainsford arrives at Ship-Trap Island and meets Ivan at the door of Zaroff’s chateau he says, “I am Sanger Rainsford of New York” (4). Upon meeting with Ivan at the chateau, Rainsford explains to him that he is a foreign traveler from America and is in need of assistance. On the other hand, Zaroff and his father are from Russia where “He [Zaroff’s…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford for a second, assuming that a single part of his web of deceit is true, we would find several plot holes. Rainsford also claims that Zaroff killed men because he was bored with killing animals, which could very well be Rainsford’s actual psychological state, but framed on Zaroff. Zaroff promised Rainsford freedom if he survived three nights without being killed, and Rainsford survived, but didn’t give Zaroff a chance to send him to freedom. Justice on murder is based on whether the murder was necessary, but this murder was obviously not necessary due to the end of the 3 night limit. Some may say it was self defense, but there is no real proof that Zaroff hunted men besides Rainsford’s words, which only words are not reasonable proof. In the words of Lois McMaster Bujold, “The dead cannot cry out for justice. It is a duty of the living to do so for them.” The only real proof there is are the fingerprints on the knife that slew Ivan and that Rainsford killed…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately Zaroff can be characterized as Mysterious and cruel. First off one way Zaroff is mysterious is he already knows who Rainsford is without ever meeting each other before. Conelle page 44, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home… I am General Zaroff.” As you can see from this quote Zaroff is excited to meet Rainsford and immediately wants to get to know him better. My second reason is Zaroff acts strange in general around Rainsford. Conelle page 44 “The menacing look in his eyes did not change… a black uniform trimmed with gray astrakhan.” By this quote you can tell Rainsford is feeling uncertain and curious of him. You can also tell by his first reaction he is in some…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford will not take over General Zaroff’s game of hunting other humans. For instance, when General Zaroff asks Rainsford to go hunting, he says, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(25) Rainsford classifies himself as someone who hunts animals, but not humans. He disapproves of General Zaroff’s game and most likely still does. In addition, while Rainsford is being hunted, he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.”(31) Rainsford is truly afraid at this point just like other humans are when they are being hunted. He has had the horrifying experience and probably doesn’t want anyone to feel this fear. As a result, Rainsford is a gentleman and animal…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He changes his thoughts about hunting cause of general zaroff,rainsford using nature to hide from zaroff and builds traps,borsch is a russian soup that has cream on top,that he is wrong cause instinct is a match for something,rainsford did not want to be zaroff partner and wants to be hunted,the example of a game is playing by the rules,he kills animals and humans which makes rainsford rethink his idea of zaroff and wants to get out of there though how will he get back if he has no boat or something else and at the end of the story what will rainsford do if he won the game,which is interesting to think about though the other people that are trapped are…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Is Rainsford Clever

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rainsford is young wealthy man who loves to hunt, and is good at it, he knows lots of different hunting techniques and how to make a various amount of effectful traps that he uses later on in the story.Furthermore is witty, in good shape, has wicked eye sight and the ability to pick out small movements and animals from…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A numerous amount of people kill for many reasons. Some kill to protect out country, some kill for fun. Others may kill to protect themselves or their family. Sanger Rainsford kills for the sport and entertainment such as General Zaroff. However, the view on General Zaroff’s killing is different than Rainsford’s because he is killing humans. For example, in the story General Zaroff states “I hunt the scum of the earth: sailors from tramp ships—lassars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels—a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them.”…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Graham Greene’s “The Destructors” and Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford and Trevor (better known as T.) are each faced with a moral dilemma. Each character is confronted with a post-war scenario. While T. is immersed in it, living in a post-war London, and striving to fit in with his peers; Rainsford faces an opponent who survived the overthrow of the Czar and continued to pursue his favored sport despite societal acceptance. T. is from a higher social status than that of his peers and must find a way to fit in and earn their respect. Rainsford is shipwrecked on an island with a “big game” hunter and must survive the most challenging hunt of his life. The purpose of this essay is to compare the way these moral dilemmas affect each character, how they address the struggle, how they internalize their perception, and how they work toward resolution with their inner conflict.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, there is much evidence to support that both endings are likely. The possibility that Rainsford develops Zaroff’s lust for hunting could very much be true; however, the possibility that Rainsford continuing to show distaste for hunting humans is also likely. Confirming the true ending of “The Most Dangerous Game” just cannot be done, as is the entire point of such an ambiguous ending. It is up to the reader to decide how to interpret…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays