Preview

Vidding and Copyright Infringement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Vidding and Copyright Infringement
Many people have become semi famous from others vidding content that they uploaded or appeared in. A few semi famous people, extra ordinary personalities, that come to mind are the Double Rainbow Guy, aka Yosemitebear, Sweet Brown, and Antoine. Without “vidding” these people would not have had any fame or acknowledgement whatsoever. There is a fine line between copyright infringement and vidding. One factor that I think plays an important role in differentiating the two is if a video is modified from its original version and an artistic twist is added. Art is intellectual property, and by adding your own property to it, makes it your own. The Double Rainbow video is a great example. This video was up on the YouTube sight for quite some time before being discovered by talk show host Jimmy Kimmel who posted a tweet with the YouTube link on his Twitter account. From there the video spread like wildfire and people were interviewing the maker of the, Paul Vasquez a Yosemite Park resident. Three days later, a well-known auto tuner made a remix video with a song out of the double rainbow video. The song was made available on ITunes and the profits are split 50/50 with Paul Vasquez, who made the original video and the remix auto tuner, known by user name schmoyoho. When the person vidding the original pays royalties or splits profits, then I think this is not copyright infringement because they are paying their dues. If a person profits from using the original version in their new formatted version, then they should have to pay the original owner a portion, it is only fair. I think this is the fine line between self-expression, freedom of speech, and copyright infringement. If you are looking to profit from the content without consent than that is unethical. However, if you are adding your own perception of a television show or video just to express your point of view then this falls under freedom of speech. With social media more popular than ever, there are millions of


References: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/double-rainbow Lawrence, A. T. & Weber, J. (2011). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy (13th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. ISBN: 978-0-07-813715-0

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 250 Week 4 Disc1

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lawrence, A., Weber, J. (2010). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. New York, NY.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the technological age has approached and developed the definition of creativity has broadly expanded. The editing and reordering of a song or movie is the art of which we call remixing. Lawrence Lessig recognizes remixing as an accessible, forbidden art in his essay “Why Crush Them?” Unfortunately laws, such as copyright laws, infringe on the creators thought and ability to publicly make their name with this form of art.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Garfield, most people create or share video content online because everyone wants to be a movie star and posting home made videos of them self gives them a chance at that. And to give other people a chance to view it. I do agree with it because I think it gives people a chance to feel accepted. Hollywood’s role in video entertainment has changed in that the internet video sites such as you tube are taking over the way people view television. Advertisers are putting their ads on websites to promote their product more often now. “Exploding TV” and “Monkeyvision” are fitting titles for the you tube phenomenon Garfield describes because you tube offers a way to view television without commercials.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eric Faden's created a mashup of many different Disney movies . His fair use tale is not infringing copyright because he was following the fair use laws. He only used portions of the movies, he cited all of the movies he took from and gave who created them. Others think that this is invading copyright because he did not get permission from the copyright owner.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Ryan Vergone

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The most confusing area for an independent film maker is dealing with all the legal issues, as an example situation of these legal issues here is a situation with an independent filmmaker who wants to make a music video clip. This music video is for an independent band from perth the film maker is curious about all the legal issues involved in her situation. The song was written by the entire band and was recorded at the singer’s home studio, the band has some basic ideas that would like to include in the music video. This music video is going to be placed on You-tube as well as the bands website and will be included as an additional feature to the CD package which will be distributed by a record label in Australia. As there will be a profit taken from the distribution of the music video there are many legalities including contracts, legal forms and possible lawsuits.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the works “Everything is a Remix” a film by Kirby ferguson and the article “Music remixes: Copyright infringement or creative expression” by Ali Pyrah, both discuss the issue of creativity and remixes and how they infringe on copyright and how it is difficult to tell when a remix is overreaching. Each text explains the concept it in a different way, in ‘Everything's a remix” the author discusses how just about everything was invented thorugh remixing and how movies, TV, and music all take different elements from work that already exist, in ‘Music remixes “Copyright infringement or creative expression” the author discusses how remixes are considered stealing work by some authors and what potential…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vidding Who Does It Cost?

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “It’s on the Internet, publicly available, so it must be free to be used.” “It is simply a way for me to express myself.” “It is totally different than what they created, it is mine now.” (Lawrence & Weber, 2012). Is this a justified argument for creating viding videos? When creating something using what other people have created and then changing it to fit your art is not a justified act. A person using justice reasoning considers who pays the cost and who gets the benefits; if the shares seem fair then the action is probably just (Lawrence & Weber, 2012). People spend hours and hours creating music. It comes from deep down in their souls, something they have felt. Using music that someone else has created to create something of your own is not holding the whole party to a fair standard. The original creator is not getting recognized for his or her work. Therefore it is not just. Is the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech? Vidding is the practice of creating new videos, sometimes called songvids or fanvids, which takes existing clips, usually from popular television shows, anime series, or music videos, and blends them with a song. It is a mix of narrative storytelling and visual poetry (Lawrence & Weber, 2012). Because viding is using other forms of art that someone else has already created would mean no its not ok to upload vid videos. However being able to have free speech on the Internet is huge. We the people do have the right to speak freely in any way we want to. Yet we have to make sure that the way we speak out is done in a way that is original.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So therefore you would imagine that he would know the terms and laws of fair use and copyright. He claims hos video is fair use and I would be confident in what he is saying because he is a professor for creating stuff like that. Overall Professor Eric Faden did not break the terms of fair use. His video is for educational purposes, he made it to describe fair use and copyright. He only used small amounts of the disney movies. He did not use main phrases from them, he only used small sections that could be no longer than eight seconds, and he uses very small words. He doesn't charge people for viewing the video, it is free. So therefore Professor Eric Faden did not break any copyright or fair use laws or…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Copyright

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page

    Copyright Infringement is classified into three different theories, which are direct, indirect, and vicarious. The direct theory will be the most used because if the owner can prove their legal ownership of the work that is in question, and that the infringed used their work without any type of permission. The indirect theory is when a party materially contributes to facilitates, or is responsible for directly infringing act carried out by another party. Final vicarious theory is someone is liable for the copyright even when that person or party is not the one who did the infringing.…

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Remix Culture

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The saying “we live in a remix culture” has become more and more recognized and legitimate. A remix culture is defined as a civilization that gives people permission to rearrange, edit, and integrate existing materials to create a new piece of work. Amongst “the age of remix”, it is now very common for people to ingeniously and efficiently exchange information and ideas through digital technologies, which are what fundamentally give rise to remixing. Resultantly, it is more accessible for everyone to share each of his or her various amendments to perhaps a certain same piece of original. Remixing is acknowledged as a desirable concept as it is argued that remixing means being able to assemble great elements from different sources and transform them into something entirely fresh but even better than their originals. In doing so, people could individually achieve preferred results for their objectives by recycling and adding their own values to the work of copyright holders. This eventually contributes to the whole society’s growth and development in wealth.…

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material in a manner that violates one of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works that build upon it.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firstly it is noteworthy to mention some commentaries on music copyright. “When considering the area of musical works, it is necessary to regard music as a language, with its own vocabulary and structure”.4 However, there is no explicit definition defining musical work, which means that the “copyright in musical work remains an abstract concept”.5 Moreover, “the copying of musical ideas and motifs from a musical work, which are not themselves original, will not normally constitute infringement of that musical work”.6 It means that only musical works which are purely original will be given the copyright protection, whether it is representing the mere idea or expression of idea does not matter much.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    including hiding data within: text, mpeg layer three and images. This paper also covers basic algorithm for…

    • 3592 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    laws

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Copyright is directly infringed when a person exercises the exclusive rights of the copyright owner in relation to the creation without the owner’s permission to do so. One of those rights is the right to copy the creation.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intellectual Property

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Time does fly so fast that today’s innovation is inclusive. With these innovations, some creates originally and some just imitates these originals. And with the intellectual property law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights to a variety of intangible assets. As a student of Information Technology with Specialization in Digital Arts, I program a website and create a digital art. We create new concept in websites, illustrations, and movies which makes us the owner of these assets that we need to protect from plagiarism. As a human, we do not want anyone borrow our valuable things without permission and as an artist, every creations we make is like these valuable things. On 2011, a Filipino action-fantasy movie, Panday 2, has been accused of copying a monster from the Hollywood blockbuster film “Clash of the Titans” in one of its scenes. Plagiarism may not be a crime but the alleged movie can be liable for copyright infringement because they used an exact same concept from another movie. This instance could be solved if they recognized their character as another version or if they buy the copyright of the movie they got it from. In most cases, producers buy copyrights to make another version. The most popular is buying copyrights from authors of book to create it a movie version.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays