The athletic participants’ calf sizes were typically between 30 cm and 32 cm, as well as 37 cm and 38 cm. All of the athletes’ vertical leaps were higher than 25 cm. This data displayed an inverse linear relationship between the leap and calf size; a best fit line could be drawn. The t-test produced a mean value of 30.2 +/- 4.2 cm. The non athletic participants’ data showed that the calf sizes varied, and the height of the vertical leaps tended to be lower than the athletes. The vertical leaps for the non athletes typically reached a 25 cm height or lower with a few outliers. This data displayed an inverse linear relationship, but a best fit line could not be drawn. The t-test produced a mean value of 25.3 +/- 7.8 cm. The t-test conducted on the vertical jumps between athletic and non athletic female participants indicated no significant difference (P value = 0.0918), but there was a large difference between the two groups. Figure 3 compared the vertical leaps of athletic and non athletic male participants. These results were used to determine whether training as an athlete had the possibility of increasing the height of the subject’s vertical
The athletic participants’ calf sizes were typically between 30 cm and 32 cm, as well as 37 cm and 38 cm. All of the athletes’ vertical leaps were higher than 25 cm. This data displayed an inverse linear relationship between the leap and calf size; a best fit line could be drawn. The t-test produced a mean value of 30.2 +/- 4.2 cm. The non athletic participants’ data showed that the calf sizes varied, and the height of the vertical leaps tended to be lower than the athletes. The vertical leaps for the non athletes typically reached a 25 cm height or lower with a few outliers. This data displayed an inverse linear relationship, but a best fit line could not be drawn. The t-test produced a mean value of 25.3 +/- 7.8 cm. The t-test conducted on the vertical jumps between athletic and non athletic female participants indicated no significant difference (P value = 0.0918), but there was a large difference between the two groups. Figure 3 compared the vertical leaps of athletic and non athletic male participants. These results were used to determine whether training as an athlete had the possibility of increasing the height of the subject’s vertical