Preview

Utilitarianism or God, Do We Have to Choose?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1614 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism or God, Do We Have to Choose?
Utilitarianism or God, do we have to choose?

During many years that question is being formulated and many scholars had a very difficult time to decide if it was possible to follow God's will and the principle of utility maximization. The principle of utility maximization was a theory created by John Stuart Mill and presented in his book Utilitarianism (1863). Societies throughout the years have argued that those theories are hard to combine, since Utilitarianism seeks for self-development and God's teachings seek for community growth. This paper will start with a context on actuality of society, then it will try to clarify what is the Bible view of Utilitarianism by explaining the principle of Utilitarianism, what society has to change to avoid to forget God's principles and only base their behavior on Mill's theory, how society should accept both theories and combine them into one in order to create a better society.
An important part of this discussion is based on understanding what is happening with society nowadays. Societies all around the world are becoming more and more individualists, what is causing problems that can affect the whole world, problems such as terrorists attacks, war or even in a lower but maybe more important scale hunger. This is basically happening because every single member of every society is only looking after themselves instead of the group, they are only trying to progress individually, but most of these individuals forget that to really achieve the top you need help, and that help comes from other individuals. The following part of the paper will try to clarify the biblical view of Mill's theory, the Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism has always been seen as an opposite theory from God's teachings. That is not absolutely correct. Jesus gave us the major example of understanding Mill's principle by dying on the cross. Of course it is simple to say that Jesus died for every human being and that is a proof of community spirit instead



Cited: • "FAO unveils global anti-hunger program" http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/news/2002/5500-en.html • Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism, Hackett Publishing Company Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, 1979, Original Publication, 1861 • Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism, Hackett Publishing Company Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, 1979, Original Publication, 1861 • Harcourt, Edward, "Mill 's ‘Sanctions ', Internalization and the Self" European Journal of Philosophy; Oct98, Vol • Kant Immanuel, Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals, Third Edition, Hackett Publishing Company Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, 1993, Original Publication, 1785 • Smart, and Bernard Williams

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psci 231 Midterm Review

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Section One: 1. What is, “Utilitarianism” and why is it important to the study of businessgovernment relations? Utilitarianism is a usually described as the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It reflects the action that produces the most happiness for people; meaning that an action is good if it produces a higher ultility of happiness. The thoery treats all members of a society equally, balances the inequalities in wealth between rich and poor people and justifies human acts. For example, consider a single mother stealing baby formlua. In this case, the mother is not harming anyone else and her baby is getting the food it needs. The happiness of the mother is justified because her actions did not harm anyone, and her baby having enough food increases her ulitily. John S. Mill would focus on the things that give people happiness rather than judeging actions based on religion and culture. Critisicsms of utilitariansim can also be made. It is understood that utilitarianism measures the total hapiness of people. However, it is not not right to assume that two people will have the same level of utility over something. An example of this can be depicted in the following scenario. Person A loves horses and buys a new sadle which gives her a total util of 50. Person B rather, is interested in sports car. Person B is uninterested in the saddle and would most likely produce a util of about 10. Therefore it is unpossible to say that levels of utility are compareable amongst people. Another criticsm of utilitarianism is that it fails to promote individual rights. Say that a mother likes hitting her child, and while doing so, her level of utility increases. Utilitarianism would support the mother and justify her acts because she is obtaining an increasing amont of utility. However, hitting your child repetively is morally and ethically wrong. But, in this case, according to utilitarianism, the utility gain of the mother is greater than the utility cost endured by the…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism: social choice theory and J.S.Mill’s Philosophy. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through the course of this paper the author will try to demonstrate, depicting both sides of the argument, the reasons in which a follower of John Stuart Mill 's "Utilitarianism" would disagree with the events taking place in Ursula Le Guin 's "The One 's Who Walk Away from Omelas."…

    • 1220 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed in an ethical theory known as utilitarianism. There are many formulation of this theory. One such is, "Everyone should act in such a way to bring the largest possibly balance of good over evil for everyone involved." However, good is a relative term. What is good? Utilitarians disagreed on this subject. Mill made a distinction between happiness and sheer sensual pleasure. He defines happiness in terms of higher order pleasure (i.e. social enjoyments, intellectual). In his Utilitarianism (1861), Mill described this principle as follows:According to the Greatest Happiness Principle … The ultimate end, end, with reference to and for the sake of which all other things are desirable (whether we are considering our own good or that of other people), is an existence exempt as far as possible from pain, and as rich as possible enjoyments.Therefore, based on this statement, three ideas may be identified: (1) The goodness of an act may be determined by the consequences of that act. (2) Consequences are determined by the amount of happiness or unhappiness caused. (3) A "good" man is one who considers the other man's pleasure (or pain) as equally as his own. Each person's happiness is equally important.Mill believed that a free act is not an undetermined act. It is determined by the unconstrained choice of the person performing the act. Either external or internal forces compel an unfree act. Mill also determined that every situation depends on how you address the situation and that you are only responsible for your feelings and actions. You decide how you feel about what you think you saw.Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) had an interesting ethical system. It is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from…

    • 3276 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill (1806-1871) decided to refine Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism. However when he refined the theory he kept the same general principle as Bentham which is maximising…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Theories

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism is a moral theory that bases its decisions on the consequences of individual’s decisions. The main question under this theory is what would provide the “greatest good for the greatest number of people.” The Utilitarianism Theory “(1) Recognizes the fundamental role of pain and pleasure in human life, (2) approves or disapproves of an action on the basis of the amount of pain or pleasure brought about i.e, consequences, (3) equates good with pleasure and evil with pain, and (4) asserts that pleasure and pain are capable of quantification (and hence 'measure ').” Therefore the outcome of an individual’s choice must take into account others feelings while making a decision. Essentially utilitarianism suggests that if majority of the people who are affected by a decision or action are not happy then the decision or action is wrong. This theory supports that individuals should not follow what culture…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Mill’s utilitarianism and how it may be applied to one ethical issue other than abortion or euthanasia. (30 marks)…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill S Ethical Theory

    • 703 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Idea of Mill 's ethical theory is his Greatest Happiness Principle in that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and they are wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Happiness is the intended pleasure and the absence of pain. Unhappiness is the pain and the lack of pleasure. Pleasure and freedom from pain are the only desirable things.” Mill 's view of happiness is hedonistic, which suggests that the only good thing in a person is pleasure and the absence of pain and the only bad thing in a person, is pain and the absence of pleasure. Mills happiness ethical theory, utilitarianism, gives us confidence to do what will bring more pleasure and less/no pain to ourselves or to others (Collins 1991).…

    • 703 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    utilitarianism

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ultimately utilitarianism is a way of improving the lives of most people, and religious ethics also aims to act out of compassion and love to improve the lives of others. For example, Christianity has certain rules that benefit those in society. We know that they work as many of those rules are tied in with the laws of the country. For instance, Murder and stealing are both illegal and you can be punished if you do either. Parts of Mill’s theory of rule utilitarianism can be applied to religious ethics. For example Mill compared the principle of utility to these Christian teachings, “you must love your neighbour as yourself.” And “do to others as you would have them do to you.” In rule utilitarianism it looks at care for the individual and therefore this would support these Christian teachings as that is a very loving thing to do. However, Bentham’s theory of Act Utilitarianism would not be supported by any Christian theories as it promotes finding pleasure, even if by finding pleasure it means you act immorally. For example, if there was a room full of about 20 people, all of those people hated one person in the group. Bentham’s theory would justify the killing of that person as it brings about the greatest pleasure for the greatest number, but Christians would be totally against that as it breaks the 6th commandment, “thou shall not kill.” This statement could be seen as unfair as bringing about pleasure for the greatest number of people could count as the most loving thing to do, “agape” in Christian’s eyes. It would be the most loving thing to do for the greatest number of people, however it could target individuals and that would break the teaching, “love thy neighbour.”…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, one criticism against Utilitarianism that Mill addresses is the assumption that happiness is not a realistic or logical standard to achieve. Here, Mill defends Utilitarianism by stating that this theory’s definition of happiness does not indicate a perfect life with no ups and downs. Instead, it represents more of a stable life where “a few transitory pains” (15) exist, but is mostly filled with happiness. Another criticism that Mill shut down, was the one that accused this philosophy of being unchristian-like because it resolves around a person’s happiness and the consequences that bring the most pleasure. Mill’s response was that Utilitarianism, in fact, places the happiness of everyone whom it may concern above one’s own happiness. The author continues and even asserts that “[i]n the golden rule of Jesus of Nazareth, we read the complete spirit of the ethics of utilitarianism. To do as you would have other do unto you, and to love your neighbor as yourself, constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality” (18). Nevertheless, arguing that utilitarianism underlies some of the basics included in the Christian religion. Interestingly enough, an additional criticism of Utilitarian states that it is unfeasible because it demands quite the thought process and time in order to decide which actions will serve all the best. The author believes this is silly because mankind, for several centuries, has had more than enough time and experience to quickly distinguish the best decision amongst a set of options (21). Although these are only three of the criticisms that Mill tackles, he truly does defend Utilitarianism from every…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant or Mill

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mill’s theories stuck out in comparison, especially when he gave his thoughts on utilitarianism in a systematic view. This was when he gave his ideas of pleasure and pain. That morality is grounded—namely, that pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends; and that all desirable things (which are as numerous in the…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In terms of Utilitarianism, this assignment shall outline the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. It shall firstly illustrate the ideas of Bentham and then follow on to compare and contrast those of Mill. To continue, the assignment will view the failing qualities in both the men's works. Bentham did leave a great deal unsaid in his work yet the fact that he allowed for individuality to be applied to his theory shall be revealed. To a large extent, the work of Mill was deeply valuable to the theory of Utilitarianism; however a number of aspects cannot be applied to all cases. Mill asserted his own preconceptions into his theory so that it could not always be found applicable. In consideration of these points I will explain why I believe Bentham's theory to be more convincing, or rather more appropriate.…

    • 2063 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the ethical debate, a divide has long existed between two models. One school of thought, notably Immanuel Kant’s Deontology, emphasizes the importance moral motivation, the other, represented by Consequentialism, emphasizes the importance of the outcome. Consequentialism is distinguished from the deontological model as it holds that the ultimate rightness or wrongness of one’s conduct is found in the consequences, or effects, of one’s acts. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism that recognizes happiness as the ultimate end of all individual and communal acts. Happiness for the Utilitarian is the maximization of pleasure and the absence of pain; it is fundamental to our nature to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Taking this aspect into consideration, Utilitarianism proposes that the moral ‘ought’ should be intended to maximize happiness from the greatest number. Jeremy Bentham, one of Utilitarianism’s most famous advocates, defines the principle of utility, or the greatest happiness principle, as one which…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other side, Mill’s philosophy is based on pure utilitarianism (self-interest). Utilitarianism says that the basic moral principle is that we should to do whatever promotes the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Mill equated happiness with pleasure. But not all…

    • 3052 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays