Preview

Torturing Prisons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1727 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Torturing Prisons
Torturing Prisoners in the War on Terror Is Never Justified

"Torturing Prisoners in the War on Terror Is Never Justified."At Issue: How Should the United States Treat Prisoners in the War on Terror?. Lauri S. Friedman. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale.
Kenneth Roth, "Time to 'Stop Stress and Duress,'" Washington Post, May 13, 2004, p. A29. Copyright © 2004 by the Washington Post Book World Service/Washington Post Writers Group. Reproduced by permission of the author.
Kenneth Roth is the executive director of Human Rights Watch, a nonprofit organization dedicated to defending human rights around the world.
Torture should never be used to extract information from terrorist suspects. The United
…show more content…
Lost Liberties: Ashcroft and the Assault on Personal Freedom. New York: New Press, 2003. • Richard A. Clarke. Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror. New York: Free Press, 2004. • John Conroy. Unspeakable Acts, Ordinary People: The Dynamics of Torture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001. • Mark Danner. Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror. New York: New York Review Books, 2004. • Alan M. Dershowitz. America on Trial: Inside the Legal Battles That Transformed Our Nation—from the Salem Witches to the Guantanamo Detainees. New York: Warner Books, 2004. • Seymour M. Hersh. Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. • Michael Ignatieff. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004. • Chalmers Johnson. The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic [The American Empire Project]. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004. • Charles W. Kegley Jr. The New Global Terrorism: Characteristics, Causes, Controls. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002. • Bernard Lewis. The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror. Waterville, ME: Thorndike Press,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cited: zegedy-Maszak, Marianne. The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism. US News & World Report. 30 August 2008: 173-174.…

    • 779 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jenkins, G. (2006). From Kennedy 's cold war to the war on terror. History Today, 56(6), 39-41.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Looming Tower

    • 4335 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Wright, L., (2006). The looming tower: Al-Qaeda and the road to 9/11. New York : Vintage Books.…

    • 4335 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book talks about service members who tortured P.O.W’S of the war on terror. It also details how they take oaths to not torture prisoners of…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas, Dana. “Terror’s Purse Strings.” Practical Arguments: A Text and Anthology. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford St. Martin, 2014. 103-104.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case of Torture

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture is a concept that Americans attempt to avoid. If a criminal possesses the opportunity to harm innocent lives, the delinquent should be stopped. The idea presides in Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture”; Levin attempts to portray a point that the act of torturing terrorists in order to save innocent lives is justifiable. Throughout the article, Levin fabricates situations to present his argument that torture is not a bad idea. He voices that torture is not established to punish criminals, but instead it is established to hinder future malicious events from occurring. Although the United States government deems torture unconstitutional, Levin validates torture being acceptable through the utilization of the rhetorical appeals pathos and ethos.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rich, Alex K., and Gerson Moreno-Riano. "War on Terror: An Overview." Points of View (2010). Ebscohost.com. Points of View, 5 Feb. 2010. Web. 21 May 2012.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Truth about Torture,” Charles Krauthammer critically analyzes the John McCain, an individual with tremendous moral influence who was tortured by the North Vietnamese, amendment. This amendment would prohibit all forms of torture from being executed on war prisoners of America. In response, Krauthammer states that in certain scenarios, torture is not “just permissible, but also morally required.” He divides the war prisoners into the following three classifications: ordinary soldiers arrested on the battlefield, captured terrorists, and finally, terrorists who possess information. With regards to the ordinary soldiers, McCain’s amendment is justified because although these war prisoners are on the opposite side of the conflict, they are nonetheless lawful fighters who committed no crime. On the contrary, Krauthammer believes that the terrorists are not worthy of the same protection and privileges since they intend to harm innocent citizens.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Foley, B. (2007). Guantanamo and beyond: Dangers of rigging the rules. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 97(4), 1009-10069.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Katel, Peter, and Kenneth Jost. "Treatment of Detainees." CQ Researcher 16: 29 (25 Aug 2006): 673-696. (pg6) CQ Researcher Online. 17 Feb. 2010 .…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In a post-9/11 world, where it seems that terrorism is rampant and increasing numbers of extremists threaten the safety and wellbeing of American citizens, is it ever justified to bend the rules of legality and morality while fighting the war on terror? Whether or not the use of torture as an interrogation tactic is justified in these circumstances is questionable because of controversy about its legality, morality, and effectiveness; the use of torture would violate several international and domestic laws as well as compromise American morals and beliefs. Despite this controversy, the United States has employed these tactics in recent years to questionable effect; however, the use of it is illegal, immoral and ineffective. Torture should not be used in any circumstance because it violates American morals, political treaties, and laws, would diminish the reputation of the United States in the world, has not been proven effective by scientific evidence, and would create a future of uncertainty regarding the use of torture.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of Waterboarding

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Torture has long been used by law enforcement agencies and governments to questions criminals and terrorists. It is used to coax confessions or to find out any sort of information that may lead to the arrest or capture of other criminals. Although the torturing of prisoners in the United States is strictly prohibited by the constitution, the government started using the tactic waterboarding against terrorists. Although the government says waterboarding has led to prevention on mass terrorist attacks on U.S soil, it is not accepted by all of this country’s citizens. It is believed by certain people that waterboarding is torture and others do not believe it is. It is my goal to explore why the United States deemed this technique necessary and why people argue that it is unconstitutional.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper addresses one of the most abiding and heated controversies surrounding the topic of torture and morality. Put simply, this controversy concerns the issue of whether under extreme and exceptional circumstances, a government agency should be legally permitted to use torture as a means of punishment or extracting information. According to Oxford Dictionary, torture is defined as “The action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something”.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “An independent inquiry headed by former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger reported that the scale of abuses by soldiers and civilian contract interrogators at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison was much greater than previously admitted. Implicitly conceded: The whole story has not yet been told. The Schlesinger report dealt with Abu Ghraib but had little to say about what has gone on at Guantanamo and in Afghanistan.” (Pfaff). After the events at Guantanamo, the United States’ own army conducted an investigation many accounts of torture were revealed , some have been confirmed. Although some soldiers have been under interrogation for this abuse, very few have actually been sent to trial. This is a result of the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” situation often used in the military. This policy has caused many soldiers to withhold information concerning the violation of the Geneva Conventions. Higher officials are rarely convicted of these violations, yet the lower ranked soldiers have. Most of convicted lower ranked soldiers have said that they have committed torture because they were just following orders . However, they did not report the incident even after realizing what the policy on torture was. Failing to report torture has caused this issue to further spread without any consequences to those who inflict cruel punishment on to…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics