Preview

The Secret Weapon In The War On Terror

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1013 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Secret Weapon In The War On Terror
The Secret Weapon in the War on Terror
The Geneva conventions are a set of rules that seek to protect those who are not taking part in hostilities, this includes prisoners of war. Prisoners of war often suffer from cruel punishment for information. Governments worldwide have went against the Geneva Conventions in order to torture suspected people of interest. The torturing of detainees continues to be a social issue in America because of the failure to define torture, the lack of information on torture reports, and the increasing number of terrorist attacks in modern society. Although there is not a known specific date as to when torture became an issue, the events that occurred on September 11, 2001 appears to have been the spark to this
…show more content…
“International agreements on the subject have used various definitions. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment” ( Torture). However, army officials have discovered loopholes in the term in order to use torture as a strategy legally. Many officials have argued that the prohibition of cruel punishment does not apply to prisoners of war. President George W. Bush had an influence on that argument claiming that torture is a enhanced interrogation strategy used to obtain vital information. Many of American citizens accepted that term due to the emotional effect that the terrorist events on September 11,2001 had on the nation. After this misunderstanding on the issue the U.S government passed Article 17 of the Geneva Conventions establishing that no prisoner of war shall be subject to physical or mental torture. It also states that “persons taking no active part in the hostilities … shall in all circumstances be treated humanely” (Torture). A clear definition of torture is necessary to pass laws against …show more content…
“An independent inquiry headed by former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger reported that the scale of abuses by soldiers and civilian contract interrogators at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison was much greater than previously admitted. Implicitly conceded: The whole story has not yet been told. The Schlesinger report dealt with Abu Ghraib but had little to say about what has gone on at Guantanamo and in Afghanistan.” (Pfaff). After the events at Guantanamo, the United States’ own army conducted an investigation many accounts of torture were revealed , some have been confirmed. Although some soldiers have been under interrogation for this abuse, very few have actually been sent to trial. This is a result of the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” situation often used in the military. This policy has caused many soldiers to withhold information concerning the violation of the Geneva Conventions. Higher officials are rarely convicted of these violations, yet the lower ranked soldiers have. Most of convicted lower ranked soldiers have said that they have committed torture because they were just following orders . However, they did not report the incident even after realizing what the policy on torture was. Failing to report torture has caused this issue to further spread without any consequences to those who inflict cruel punishment on to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The video, “Ghosts of Abu Gharib”, told the tale of inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by United States military personnel in the early 2000’s. After the events that took place on September 11th, 2001 many individuals felt it was their need to join the army, fight for their country, and aid the war against terror. This was a very unique war because the rules of combat were not clearly stated because there was no straightforward law about treatment of individuals who were part of terror group. There was the Geneva law established in 1949 making torture illegal as an international law; however, it was not stated whether it applied to countries who were not part of making the law and did not enforce. One individual talked about his first day in combat asking about the…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The points I will cover in my paper are the following: 1. WHY TORTURE. 2. IS INFORMATION GATHERED FROM TORTURE VALID. 3. WHO WILL ULTIMATLY BE RESPONSIBLE IF TORTURE IS UPHELD TO BE LAWFULL. 4 WHAT GOES THROUGH THE MIND OF THE TORTURED INDIVIDUAL. AND 5 WHAT GOES THROUHGH THE MIND OF THE TOUTRUER. Other points may follow…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At Abu Ghraib prison, many people’s lives were changed. Some soldiers were sentenced to prison, some officers were demoted, and the prisoners lost their dignity. When people and soldiers are placed in difficult and stressful situations they will make grave mistakes, but that does not excuse their…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Geneva Conventions are a series of treaties… on the treatment of civilians, prisoners of war and soldiers, who are otherwise rendered out of the fight, or incapable of fighting (“Geneva Conventions”). Allied soldiers…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An investigation into the treatment of detainees at the prison was issued when photo were discovered of guards abusing detainees in 2003. The human rights violations included: physical and sexual abuse, torture, rape, sodomy, and murder. Many of the torture techniques used were developed at the Guantánamo detention center including prolonged isolation, a sleep deprivation technique where people were moved from cell to cell every few hours, short-shackling in painful positions; nudity; extreme use of heat and cold; the use of loud music and noise and preying on phobias. "Punching, slapping, and kicking detainees; jumping on their naked feet...positioning a naked detainee on a MRE box, with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers, toes, and penis to simulate electric torture...having sex with female detainees...using military working dogs (without muzzles) to intimidate and frighten detainees, and in at least one case biting and severely injuring a detainee...breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees...Beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair...Sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick" (qtd. in Behrens and Rosen 665-6). Eleven US soldiers were convicted of crimes relating to the Abu Ghraib scandal. A number of other service members were not charged but reprimanded. Shockingly enough, despite the level of…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sdvcsd

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From late 2003 to early 2004, during the Iraq War, military police personnel of the United States Army and the Central Intelligence Agency[1] committed human rights violations against prisoners held in the Abu Ghraib prison. They physically and sexually abused, tortured,[2][3][4] raped,[2][3] sodomized,[4] and killed[5] prisoners.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay is a US prison for terrorists and other threatening people, located off of US soil. This means that the processes that go on in the institution, legally, do not need to follow US rules. Many painful and tortuous things are performed on the prisoners, such as force feeding and the topic of this essay, water boarding, where the victim is made to feel as though they are drowning. Although Gitmo is legal/allowed to an extent, it still begs the question how the guards consciously perform such cruel acts and what I would do if I were faced with the decision of torturing a prisoner or not.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States has always prided itself on being a country of freedom. A country with liberty and justice for all. How can we as a nation still pride ourselves on these virtues when we subject people to torture? Where does the line get drawn when we allow torture to be used? We look at the Constitutional rights and the Geneva Convention, as having rules which clearly frown upon the use of torture. However under the Patriot Act we have seen the use of powers under this act to allow the use of torture which contradict the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, which were intended to stop the use of torture, and this become an issue. Do we terminate the use of torture, or do we continue to use the cruel, inhumane, and degrading acts on captivated ‘terrorists’?…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Abu Ghraib prison was a prison in Iraq that was notorious for torturing the prisoners. Some of the violations include murder, sodomy, sexual abuse, and rape. Photographs of each torture mechanism were taken and shown to the government. Many of the American soldiers involved in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal were accused of abuse. The administration of George W. Bush tried to cover up the abuse cases as “isolated incidents”, therefore making it seem as if the torture was only happening to select inmates, and as a form of intense interrogation. It was later revealed that the torture was not conducted on a select few, but conducted throughout groups of the inmates. Some of the abusers in the prison believed that they were doing a good thing.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reserch

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After this case had occurred during the Bush administration it was called into question the actions of authority figures, John Brennan current chief of counterterrorism advisor is being promoted after allegations that Brennan "sat idly by as men were being tortured" (Prasow) should…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting Away with Torture

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages

    undermined one of the most basic global standards governing how governments can treat people under their control. Contrary to the efforts of…

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has gone through many times as a country. Many events, like wars and 9/11, in the past have led and created the debate of using torture on terrorist and terrorism. One, out of the many events, that in the past have impacted the huge debate on torture was on September 11, 2001, a terrorist attack occurred where four planes were hijacked by terrorists and two were flown into the World Trade Center in New York Center, causing the country to become in an uproar. Defined by the Webster Dictionary, torture is “the act of causing severe physical pain as a form of punishment or as a way to force someone to do or say something,” while terrorism is “the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays