Preview

Theistic Argument Bias

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
302 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theistic Argument Bias
The Arguments for God and Confirmation Bias
In What Question Does a Theistic Argument Answer, Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski argues that the three arguments for the existence of a deity are responses to an assortment of inquiries. We cannot know if one of the arguments is successful, unless we can comprehend the question the argument aims to answer. In addition, we need to know who is asking the question. For instance, an agnostic may be asking a question directed towards both a theist and atheist. She also believes dialogue between open-minded individuals is more productive than a debate with a dogmatic individual. The open-minded dialogues can lead to a better understanding of the subject. Arguments for God were not originally intended to convert

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What are some examples of bias, fallacies, and specific rhetorical devices in the speech? In the speech kane uses a variety of bias which include political bias in which he is doing against Jim W. Gettys. He also uses different types of fallacies which are scapegoating, and apple polishing,and ad hominen , and using straw man fallacies and he also two others ones false dilemma and slippery slope plus begging the question too . He also uses a few different types of rhetorical devices in his speech , which include the following alliteration ,hyperbole,euphemism and paradox and metaphor.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Climatically so, the intent of Goldberg's main argument was to unmask the media bias which is strikingly seen in news coverage all over the nation. Conclusively, Bias illustrates essential key points to enhance its case. Though all in all, it is seen while descriptively depicting these vital points, Bias drifts toward self-perspicacity; judgments shaped by individual opinions and feelings, rather than outside influences. Undoubtedly, Bias has a bias of its own. One which overtly favors Goldberg in an eye-catching and an apparent manner. It is highly suggested that future readers of Bias must learn to accept the good among the bad as well as Goldberg's insights along with his insults by which are repeatedly offered. Conclusively, Goldberg…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gendler’s paper, On the Epistemic Costs of Implicit Bias, the dilemma between social knowledge and unfair treatment is presented and discussed. Gendler starts by presenting information on base rates and how background information that can show to be extremely important can be mentally dismissed since our minds are not trained for statistical calculations of chance. Then, she speaks directly to the reader on how categorizing is something that we all do, in order to prove her point that mere knowledge of stereotypes can lead to categorizing in a way that can ignore base rates and other relevant information, leading to unfair treatment. Gendler presents the ethical-epistemic dilemma by showing that once knowledge is obtained, humans have an…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1970’s philosopher McCloskey brings into question the three major arguments that are commonly presented against the question of God’s existence. McCloskey does so in an article entitled “On Being an Atheist.” In this article McCloskey commonly refers to these arguments as “proofs” rather than simply arguments. Furthermore, he argues that these “proofs” can’t be positively established and therefore one should throw said “proofs” out. In terms of a theistic view on the question of God’s existence theist openly admit that there arguments could indeed be defeasible. Theists acknowledge that there is a possibility that a defeater can be presented to shut down the conclusion…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer the following questions in a minimum of 500 words: Identify examples of bias, fallacies, and specific rhetorical devices in the speech. How did the speaker address arguments and counterarguments? Were the speaker’s arguments effective? Explain your answers.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Response Paper

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In his article, On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey tried to show that atheism is a more reasonable and comfortable belief than that of Christianity. McCloskey argued against the three theistic proofs, which are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument and the argument from design. He pointed out the existence of evil in the world that God made. He also pointed out that it is irrational to live by faith. According to McCloskey, proofs do not necessarily play a vital role in the belief of God. Page 62 of the article states that "most theists do not come to believe in God as a basis for religious belief, but come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors." However, he feels that as far as proofs serve theists, the three most commonly accepted are the cosmological, the teleological, and the argument from design. It is important to note that he considers these arguments as reasons to "move ordinary theists to their theism." (McCloskey 1968) This is not necessary the case and contradicts the former statement that most theists do not hold to these proofs. As such, the attempt to dispute these arguments as a reason not to believe in God is almost not worth attempting. If theists do not generally hold to these proofs as reasons for faith, then why bother trying to dispute them to theists? Continuing to do so seems as though he is motivated to prove a point few are not interested in disputing, and thus is purposely trying to set up theist belief as ridiculous; in other words, he is looking to pick to a fight. This is not an intellectual objective article. Bias necessarily forfeits intellectual objectivity.…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “On Being an Atheist,” H. J. McCloskey makes an entertaining, but in the end inadequate, explanation as to why the arguments for God’s existence fail (limiting himself to the only two he cared to deal with), and why Atheism provides more comfort to the hurting person than Theism.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Classical Theistic Conception of God states that there is a unique intelligent being that created the universe and that being is wholly perfect, omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent. In connection with the question of whether belief in a being that satisfies this definition is ever grounded in evidence and argument there are three arguments to consider. These three arguments are the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. Each provides separate ideas in proving the existence of a being that satisfies the Classical Theistic Conception of God.…

    • 751 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An example of bias within this speech would be: “to point out and make public the dishonesty, the downright villainy, of Boss Jim W. Gettys' political machine -- now in complete control of the government of this state!…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Out of the four arguments for the existence of a God, the Cosmological argument is the most persuasive. For thousands of years, humans have wondered what their purpose on Earth is and how we came to exist. Because of this wondering, many humans have concluded that there is an all-powerful creator who created the universe and everything in it. But, since we cannot see this creator and have no evidence as proof of his existence, there are many people who doubt the existence of an all-powerful creator. There are four main arguments for the existence of God. They are the Teleological argument, the Cosmological arguments, the Ontological arguments, and the Moral arguments. None of them provide objective proof…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays