Preview

response to Being an Atheist

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2161 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
response to Being an Atheist
In his article “On Being an Atheist,” H. J. McCloskey makes an entertaining, but in the end inadequate, explanation as to why the arguments for God’s existence fail (limiting himself to the only two he cared to deal with), and why Atheism provides more comfort to the hurting person than Theism.

Unfortunately his article is riddled with straw men and fails to address the question of God’s existence at the level that the Theist presents it. Twice in the article he makes reference to the theist’s claim that “[God’s] got the whole world in his hands.” In his opening paragraph he makes reference to a Theist who claimed that “It’s harder if you don’t believe in God.” By selecting the least intellectual and most naïve claims made by a Christian Theist, McCloskey has conveniently set the bar low enough for him to jump over with minimal effort.

In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.

In the first few paragraphs of his article, McCloskey does a little sleight of hand with his readers. He overstates the Theist’s case by referring to the proofs of God’s existence, and then feigns amazement at the fact that they actually don’t “prove” God’s existence. This sort of trick ought to be recognized by people familiar with philosophy of religion. The most common way Christian Apologists make the case for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of the paper is to answer several questions arising from an article by H. J. McCloskey entitled “On Being an Atheist”.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    H. J. McCloskey, a renowned philosopher in the mid 20th century, wrote a provocative article in 1968 titled, “On Being an Atheist”. McCloskey argues for atheism as the preferred and better belief system based upon his refutation of the theistic arguments. He argues against the existence of God by attempting to refute the cosmological and teleological arguments; as well he endeavours to discredit a God based upon the presence of evil. In doing this, he extends the boundaries for arguing God, whilst opening the floor to debate free will and the apparent comfort of the atheistic belief system. However, through careful analysis of the arguments for God, and an insight into the mysterious free will that God has given man; we see that a theistic belief is logically more sound and preferred.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Do God Exist ?

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. Because of man’s ignorance and curiosity, arguments for the existence of God have been made over the years. Basically, these arguments are divided into two large groups i.e. logical and metaphysical. Actually, these arguments seek to prove that the existence of a being or having faith with at least one attribute that only God could have is logically necessary.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mackie in his paper Evil and Omnipotence, constructs an argument against the idea of the possibility of a God existing that has the characteristics laid out by the main religions: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. These characteristics include that God is omnipotent, or He is capable of stopping evil, and omni benevolent, or He wants to eliminate evil and He is entirely good. Mackie systematically goes through his logical thought process as well as his response to any type of criticism or alternative solution that might arise. The main point of his argument is to establish that God, as constructed by Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, could not possibly exist. It is one of the most highly regarded arguments towards atheism.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theistic Argument Bias

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In What Question Does a Theistic Argument Answer, Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski argues that the three arguments for the existence of a deity are responses to an assortment of inquiries. We cannot know if one of the arguments is successful, unless we can comprehend the question the argument aims to answer. In addition, we need to know who is asking the question. For instance, an agnostic may be asking a question directed towards both a theist and atheist. She also believes dialogue between open-minded individuals is more productive than a debate with a dogmatic individual. The open-minded dialogues can lead to a better understanding of the subject. Arguments for God were not originally intended to convert…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCloskey claims that “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed.” He is implicating that we as humans do not have the full understanding or knowledge of everything about creation. Again, based on anyone arguments, he nor I can prove God, no God, or why everything is here. Even he stated in his article that if people accept the examples of purpose and design we would only be entitled to believe that there is a “powerful” “designer.” Everything he claims to be a weak argument for reasons to believe in God can be turned around towards his arguments. As said earlier I cannot prove God but believe there are many good reasons to rather than not to. He wants indisputable examples (which sounds like proof) of God. While he pushes for evolution that supposedly has undisputable proof. There is problem with this, there is no proof of the first organism or a pattern of evolvement. There is no foundation for this belief of a first organism. Only a theory based on similarity amongst organism. There is nothing that shows clearly an evolving species. If we all evolved why isn’t there any in-between species? Just similar between two completely different. His argument is not reasonable.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue that I shall be addressing is whether a certain objection to a theistic explanation of God’s existence can be sustained. In this paper, the objection in question is advanced mostly by naturalists, and the thrust of it is that theists cannot provide a satisfactory account of God’s existence based on causality because occasional philosophical questions arise concerning the truth of the premises. After carefully setting out naturalist’s objections, I shall suggest that naturalists have overlooked an important resource available to theists – namely, the use of faith in God supported with causality and scientific knowledge in support of His existence. Therefore,…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Moral Argument: Man has a sense of Morality or right and wrong. This morality comes from God. • Ontological Argument: Man cannot conceive of something greater than God so God exists. “Anti-Theistic” Explanations • Atheistic View: The nonbelief in God.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Christian evangelist would do well to know and present the cosmological, teleological, and moral arguments for God’s existence. The secular humanist should be shown that God’s existence is not only reasonable but also necessary to explain the existence of anything. This step could take a considerable amount of time depending on the secular humanists’ level of opposition. From here, the evangelist would move to God’s revelation given in the…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    God's Existance

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Brock, S. L. (2012). God 's existence. Can it be proven? A logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas. The Review of Metaphysics, 65(3), 693-695. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1008667374?accountid=32521…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atheism

    • 5786 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Do God really exist? The Bible says so. Who is god? A powerful being that created heaven and earth, a being responsible of giving life to every living things on earth, the creator of the universe. But what if there isn’t a god? What if the Bible was wrong? That there is no god at all?…

    • 5786 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    God and the Atheist

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the first chapter of this book, the author, Paul Ferguson decided to introduced this book by describing person experience with having to explain whether there is a God or not. He was able to say that not only did he have a hard time with his first argument, but also that he was able to learn from it. That particular argument made him realize how important it was to “be prepared to give an answer to anyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have” (1 Peter 3:15). In the first chapter, he also talked about Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity. He explained the difference between the world calling you a genius for something “scientifically proven” (even though 95% of the population doesn’t truthfully understand the Theory of Relativity – even the scientists who helped “prove” his theory.) In the rest of Part One, he discusses the difference between having a valid argument with an atheist and either not proving your point whatsoever, only validating their beliefs, or making yourself and your beliefs sound irrelevant. He begins by saying that you have to start off any discussion by asking what the atheist’s moral beliefs are; he says to ask what exactly their question is regarding morality, ethics, or belief in God/no God. He then goes on to discussing the question of whether or not we have a point to be on this earth, what happens to us after we die, and what happens to our “soul”. Not only does he personally believe in the Lord, but he states over and over again how important these questions are! If you ask NO OTHER questions, ask these; these are the best way to decipher what their true beliefs are and it’s the best way to figure out how to jump into your argument and how hard it will be. The next topic is discussing WHY we are here on this earth; are we here just “because”, or is there an actual point. The main idea is whether or not the person decides to be a “hero” and make wise decisions with their life, or be a…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    becoming atheist

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One day I woke up and decided that I wanted to be free of judgment and free of fear. Fear that I wasn’t living right, I wanted to be in control of my own life. I grew up not in a religious household but we all had that fear of God. I felt so comfortable not having a fear in going to Hell or trying to get into Heaven, not feeling akward when my girlfriend gives me a look for eating without saying grace. No more guilt from my Grandmother for not attending church, no more sidelooks from my mother for not going to the masjid on Fridays. Just one man who is in control of his own destiny no pre-ordained or manifested destiny in my future, I can understand why this much power can be dangerous. It techniquely means you are in control, meaning I have no one to blame for my faluires but myself. Am I truly ready to take responsibility of always being in charge with no fall guy no one to blame. I cant say that I am, even though I am more inclinded to believe the big bang theory that what happened in the three major religions (Islam, Christianity, and Judism), I still have issue with the fact that we started out from fish to monkeys to humans. A brief history of atheism The term atheism originated from the Greek ἄθεος (atheos), meaning "without god(s)", used as a pejorative term applied to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society. With the spread of freethought, skeptical inquiry, and subsequent increase in criticism of religion, application of the term narrowed in scope. The first individuals to identify themselves using the word "atheist" lived in the 18th century.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays