Preview

The Teleological Argument: A Higher Source Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Teleological Argument: A Higher Source Of God
The Teleological Argument is the argument from a design stand point. The argument implies that a higher source of intelligence had to come up with the design in which the universe came into existence. McCloskey come up with numerous reason against this argument that suggest the Teleological Argument is not adequate in proving God exist. A design must have a designer and us as humans couldn’t create the earth ourselves even if we put all our thinking caps together, the creator of this world had to be something and someone so powerful and intelligent that it was beyond human belief. Whether he wants to call the being God or not he has to realize this isn’t something that happened on its own. So my question to him would be who was the designer if it wasn’t God? McCloskey suggests the only thing we should come to conclusion with based on the teleological argument is that there was a powerful designer (McCloskey, 1968). With this notion in my opinion, McCloskey discredits his own stance by proclaiming an awareness of nature being out of order. …show more content…
McCloskey goes on to make another proclamation that in order to prove the Teleological Argument irrefutable examples of design and purpose must be presented. The major issue with his assessment is the standards he sets to defend the argument is one he can’t even live up to. Based on McCloskey accusations he implies that evolution dismisses the need for a perfect designer. It is definitely not reasonable for him to require indisputable examples, when his belief in atheism does not require one. If McCloskey was to require theism to present indisputable examples, then it is only right that he provide indisputable evidence for the arguments of atheism, which can’t be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theo 104 Quiz
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theo 104 Quiz

    The Teleological Argument (argument from design) claims that one can infer from what that God exists?…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy - Design Argument (with Plan) Essay Example
    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophy - Design Argument (with Plan) Essay Example

    It seems that everything around us is some small cog in a large piece of clockwork that has been intricately designed for all aspects of the planet to coincide and work with each other. The main strengths of the teleological argument are that the conditions of the world are so perfect for us to live in that it must have been designed. Evidence is everywhere. One can use the William Paley's watchmaker theory in support. Which states that: if you're walking along the beach and find a watch you don't assume it’s there by accident. You know someone must have made it due to how intricate the interior and it showing evidence of design; this is the same with the world. One of the most obvious forms of design is the Fibonacci sequence which appears in nature repeatedly; the mathematical pattern can be seen in snail shells and petals of a plant. It seems like this formula was the template for the production of nature, it surely cannot be coincidence that it appears in so many different aspects?…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"
    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages

    My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"

    The paper written by McCloskey is nothing more than an Atheists attempt to justify his atheistic ideas and at no time should ever be taken by any other person as anything more than one man’s opinions which are based completely upon speculative ideas. Throughout this paper, I read statements like, “theists feel…”,” Most theists believe…”, “They do not think…”, and “Most theists conclude…”; however, the person giving these tidbits is only one person, as opposed to the “most” which he seems to speak for, and he is no more a “theist”, than the “man in the moon”. I would be more inclined to over look his made-up statistics, had a single one of his claims lined up with my theistic ideas; however, every time he claimed to know how the “theists” think or feel, it turned out to be the opposite of my theistic point of view. The very basis for this fallacy can be tied to a statement in McCloskey’s opening sentence: “…the grounds upon which theists base their belief in God…” In this statement, McCloskey claims to know why theists believe in God. My next claim is pure speculation; however, if I were to ask every person in my church congregation, “why do you believe in God”, I seriously doubt anyone would respond with the cosmological argument or the teleological argument.…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'

    I think that in reading the article we can relate to McCloskey in some of his concerns. One can question is the most relatable, the idea that God exist and so does evil. Personally, I have wondered why God would allow such troublesome times upon those who ultimately do not deserve to receive them. I think it is normal as a Christian to question faith in God from time to time. When my daughter was sick recently, I remember asking God a hundred times why? What did she do to deserve such things? However, it is important to note that while we may question God for his reasons as to why certain things may occur, we do not ultimately rule out the fact that he exist entirely. I think that McCloskey had a few of his ideas on the correct path, but he failed to recognize that the arguments presented were just the most basic outline to the question of God’s existence. The teleological and cosmological arguments should be used as starting points and not as the ending arguments to the question. God is not defined, but he is always present and powerful. One should realize that there is only so much knowledge available at hand, and we can only debate so far with what we know. I would argue to McCloskey that I find greater comfort in the knowledge that there is indeed a God, and we are not just the products of some uncontrolled chaos. I choose to believe that God regulates the…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey
    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey

    In my opinion, I believe that McCloskey’s arguments against the existence of God is somewhat biased. By biased I’m inferring that his argument is a one-sided view that attempts to provide proof that God doesn’t exist based on man-made judgments about what an all-powerful, omniscient being can, should, or would do. I conclude that this is unreasonable because as mere humans, we don’t have the capability to understand the magnitude or reasoning of God. Who are we to determine what The Creator should do in any circumstance? That is not our position as humans to do this for God. Preoccupied with what an all-powerful…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Design Arguments For The Existence Of God
    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    Design Arguments For The Existence Of God

    The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    There are 3 main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. Each is different in its approach, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest Thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The Greatest Thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues that since everything in the universe is contingent (or is dependent on other things for its existence), there must be a first cause that set the universe in motion.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Teleological Argumentative Analysis

    The Teleological Argument recognizes the various complex aspects of the Earth, nature, and life and attributes these complexities to a designer. The most common analogy depicting this argument is described through a watch. A watch represents intricate and meticulous designing that couldn’t have just been formed accidentally. This analogy can be interpreted relating to the universe. The greater the design, the greater the designer. Much like the watch, there are various “natural” processes and events that happen in the world that could not have just happened coincidentally as it appears to have been the result of meticulous designing, there had to be someone or something that engineered it all and that being can be rationally reasoned to be God through the Teleological Argument as it implies intelligent design. There is no way that Earth is already fine-tuned to support the complexity of living organisms and life because there are so many qualities that characterize them; it had to be planned, intentional and caused by someone or…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Teleological Argument
    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Teleological Argument

    Teleology is an argument of God’s existence following the evidence of order defined as the design of nature. Teleological arguments also known as arguments from design, explain the order in the universe to the existence of God. The universe is believed to be ordered towards some end or a certain purpose. It is more reasonable to suggest that the universe was created by an intelligent being to accomplish a purpose rather than it being there by chance (McGrath, 2010). The teleological argument has been used to show the existence of God with popular arguments including that of William Paley. Paley used a watch to relate to the order, complexity and purpose of the universe. A watch has a number of ordered parts that work in harmony for an end…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Design Argument Analysis
    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Design Argument Analysis

    There are approximately 7 billion people that inhabit this Earth. With there being as many people as there are, there are millions of views that each individual has. Some may believe that aliens exist, and others may even believe that the moon is made out of cheese. Regardless of what somebody believes, they usually have their reasons. A discussion that is very controversial is the debate for the existence of God. People that believe in the Judeo-Christian God have different reasons for why they believe in God. Conversely, Atheists also have their own take on why God does not exist, as well. A popular argument is known as the Design Argument. In this paper, the Design Argument will be discussed and analyzed.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ontological And Cosmological Argument
    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ontological And Cosmological Argument

    The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments collectively strive to prove one point, the existence of God. Ontological arguments lean on reasoning to prove its point of an a priori being or existence. Cosmological arguments focus on the idea that because there is this vast universe with an infinite amount of galaxies, God or a higher being, must have had a hand in creating the world and universe we live in. Teleological arguments emphasize on the idea that the universe was created solely to carry out the purpose or end result that it was designed for by…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Response Paper
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosophy Response Paper

    The simple term "proof" is what McCloskey refers to as the arguments. McCloskey feels that because the proofs do not contain definitive evidence for God's existence, they should then be thrown out. This is not a correct way of thinking. The good Lord can not be proven or disproven scientifically. But once a person commits themselves to God and truly lets God in their hearts, this person will have a completely different mind set. Just because there is no definitive evidence of God, does not mean He does not exist.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics