Preview

Ontological And Cosmological Argument

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
97 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ontological And Cosmological Argument
The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments collectively strive to prove one point, the existence of God. Ontological arguments lean on reasoning to prove its point of an a priori being or existence. Cosmological arguments focus on the idea that because there is this vast universe with an infinite amount of galaxies, God or a higher being, must have had a hand in creating the world and universe we live in. Teleological arguments emphasize on the idea that the universe was created solely to carry out the purpose or end result that it was designed for by
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis

    Anselm’s ontological argument is an a priori proof of God’s existence. Anselm starts with an idea that depends on experience for their justification and then proceeds by purely logical means to the conclusion that God exists. His aim is to refute “the fool who says in his heart there is no God” (Psalms 14:1) this is showing that the ‘fool’ has important features which are; he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe God exists. Anselm said “an atheist cannot consistently be an atheist”, they want to challenge that God does not exist but by having an understanding concept of God, then he must exist. Anselm had a clear understanding of an all knowing, all powerful and an all loving God, thus believing God exists.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis

    Who is responsible for creating all of mankind and all that surrounds it? God is responsible for the creation of the universe and the existence of that personal God is proven by a plethora of scientific evidence and logically probable reasons. Ironically, some of the opposing arguments originating from the atheistic worldview contribute to the constructing of theistic truths. While using the multiple competing hypotheses method of finding the most probable cause to the universe and the existence of all mankind, a personal creator fits better than the probability of creation just happening by chance. This universe is very complex and the existence of the personal creator can be explained in two arguments out of the many existing arguments…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis

    Anselm is not trying to say that whatever one can think of exist because, everyone can think of something that does not exist. Neither is he trying to saying believing in something without any doubt makes it exist. Finally Anselm might believe in God, he is not trying to convince us that God exist but rather he is trying to show us that once one understands or grasp the concept of who or what God, then based on logic it follows that God has to exist. Anselm ontological argument follows that if one makes an assumption and can show things that follow from that assumption lead to contradiction, then the initial assumption is rejected and conclude the opposite…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Modern Versions Of The Ontological Argument
    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Summary: Modern Versions Of The Ontological Argument

    One influential attempt to ground the ontological argument in the notion of God as an unlimited being. As Malcolm describes this idea:…

    • 2339 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    William L Rowe Ontological Argument
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    William L Rowe Ontological Argument

    According to William L. Rowe the Ontological argument can be thought of as “a family of arguments, each member of which begins with a concept of God, and by appealing only to a priori principles, endeavors to establish that God actually exists”(pg11, Feinberg, Shafer-Landau). The weakest version of the ontological argument is St Anselm version.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Anselm's ontological argument.
    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Anselm's ontological argument.

    Saint Anselm, the author of the book The Proslogian came up with what is believed to be the first formulation of the ontological argument. The writings of the ontological argument in The Proslogian were Anselm’s reflections of the passage Psalm 14:1 “Fools say in their hearts ’There is no god’” and directs his argument at the ‘fools’ From this passage. Ontology means the study of being so therefore Anselm’s argument is formulated to prove the existence of god through the study of being. Anselm formulates 2 ontological arguments for the existence of god.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God on the basis that the universe has not always been in existence and so for it to be created, an external cause was necessary; this outside agent is viewed as God. It creates à posteriori knowledge which provides inductive explanations and makes conclusions on ideas based on actual experiences. It is a non-propositional argument so it cannot be proven but can be argued by offering experience as support.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analyse The Reasoning Of The Ontological Argument As Presented By Anselm
    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyse The Reasoning Of The Ontological Argument As Presented By Anselm

    The ontological argument is A priori argument for the existence of God. St Anselm is the name most firmly associated with the origins of the ontological argument and he was an 11 century writer and the Archbishop of Canterbury. The argument has the form of a deductive proof and it an analytical argument. He wrote two treatises (the Monologion and Proslogion) which became the foundation of the Ontological Argument. The reasoning for Anselm’s argument can easily be seen in the arguments proposed themselves, however the purpose is slightly more debateable and seems to be somewhere between the view of a critical rationalist and a strong rationalist, I will discuss this after I have explained the reasoning behind the argument.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument Essay Example
    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument Essay Example

    The ontological argument for God’s existence is a work of art resulting from philosophical argumentation. An ontological argument for the existence of God is one that attempts the method of a priori proof, which utilizes intuition and reason alone. The term a priori refers to deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the type of reasoning that proceeds from general principles or premises to derive particular information. The argument works by examining the concept of God, and arguing that it implies the actual existence of God; that is, if we can conceive of God then God exists. However, this type of argument is often criticized as committing a bare assertion fallacy. The bare assertion fallacy is fallacy in formal logic where a premise in an argument is assumed to be true merely because it says that it is true.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Ontological Argument
    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of The Ontological Argument

    The ontological argument that discusses the viewpoints that support the concept of God and also question God’s existence. The argument is strongly reductio ad absurdum, which is a type of argument focusing on the assumption of truth of a statement that is false, and thus proving that assumption becomes a contradiction. To illustrate, St Anselm used the ontological argument to show that “God doesn’t exist” and proved that the statement lead to a contradiction and thus, the entire statement becomes false. Guanillo criticizes St Anselm’s argument by saying that it is impossible to come up with a perfect being such a God as no perfection exists in humanity.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Work Cited
    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Work Cited

    According to Descartes, Rationalism is an epistemological position in which reason is said to be the primary source of all knowledge, superior to sense evidence. In other words, rationalism is the idea that people need to have some sort of reasoning to back up their ideas. Nobody is going to believe you just because you said it, you have to provide evidence. Rationalists believe that abstract reasoning can produce absolute truths about nature and existence in general which relates to his idea of the coherence theory of truth and how evidence is required for ideas to be made. An ontological argument is an argument that attempts to prove the existence of God by referring to the meaning of the word or by referring to the purportedly unique quality of the concept that is God. An example of this argument is the Pros logion of St. Anselm where the monk tried to provide Christian documentation for the existence of god. The relationship between C1 and C2 can be identified as a part-whole relationship where C2 can be considered part of C1. The reason being is because C2 refers to this idea of god and how people using different doctrines try to prove this existence but in order to prove his existence you have to include this idea of rationalism because you need some sort of evidence and reasoning behind the idea in order for people to understand your point. An example of C1 could be from an experiment we did in science class when I was in 5th when we filled up a glass with water and put a straw in it. The reason this experiment relates to the idea of rationalism is because when you look at the straw after placing it in the cup, it looks like that the straw is broken or cracked because of the light refraction, but you understand that it is not broken or cracked.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument Strengths
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ontological Argument Strengths

    The Ontological Argument was, and still is, a hot-topic for debate among philosophers; many famous philosophers have published criticisms of the theory including Immanuel Kant and St. Thomas Aquinas. This obviously raises questions regarding whether or not this argument works. While there is no clear-cut answer to these questions, I personally believe that the negatives of this argument outweigh the positives, thereby making it a weak argument.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part B. the Ontological Argument Is a Convincing Argument. Discuss
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Part B. the Ontological Argument Is a Convincing Argument. Discuss

    The ontological argument was first made famous in the 11th century by St Anslem from Canterbury and was later taken further by French philosopher Rene Descartes. The debate is an attempt to confirm God’s existence as a priori argument. It does not rely on observations of the world around us it simply uses logic and the idea that it is illogical to say that God does not exist as its main factor.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ontological Argument For Existence Of God
    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Ontological Argument For Existence Of God

    The ontological argument is a philosophical argument for existence of God. It argues that God is the greatest of all, and no being could possibly be greater. And it proves itself by the theory that God exists as an idea in our minds. Therefore God is also an idea that exists in reality. If God only was an idea of the mind and not reality we should be able to think of something greater that exists in both. Since we can not think of anything greater that exists in our mind and reality, God exists. The greatest island fails as an objection to the ontological argument because there could always be a better island. There is no intrinsic maximum for an island. The thought of God is a perfection of all sorts, like morals and power. These do have an…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument
    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ontological Argument

    The ontological argument is an attempt to refute skepticism of God and prove His existence through reason alone. The philosopher, Saint Anselm, presented his work on the ontological argument, or argument from reason, in his text the Proslogium. The argument, on the surface, is very logically convincing and attempts to allure even the skeptic of God. Anselm tries to show the proposition of God exists based on analytic necessary truth – which will be discussed later in further detail. This paper will explain and assess the deductive and a priori nature of the argument, address the objections…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics