Preview

The Tariff Crisis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Tariff Crisis
The crisis over the Tariff of 1828 continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the Age of Jackson: namely, that many southerners believed a democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. These southerners saw themselves as an embattled minority and claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty. The relationship between the north and south was tenuous when Andrew Jackson came to office in 1828. Ever since the Constitutional Convention of 1787, northerners and southerners had fought over slavery and tariffs. Each region wanted to make sure their economies were protected in the new Union. Several times states threatened to leave the Constitutional Convention …show more content…
Congress passed a high protective tariff on imported, primarily manufactured goods. The south, being predominantly agricultural and reliant on the north and foreign countries for manufactured goods, saw this tariff as an affront to their economy (Wilson). Many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank. Vice President John C. Calhoun called it a “tariff of abominations” that was meant to favor the north and this tariff led him to pen his “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” in which he argued that if a national majority acted against the the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify— federal law (Corbett). The theory of nullification, or the voiding of unwelcome federal laws, provided wealthy slaveholders, who were a minority in the United States, with an argument for resisting the national government if it acted contrary to their …show more content…
It also eventually became a factor in causing the southern states to nullify the Union itself, bringing about their secession and the creation of the Confederacy. Although the Compromise Tariff of 1833 was passed, which mollified the South Carolina legislature and caused them to withdraw the Ordinance of Nullification, unrest in the southern states continued, eventually leading to the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. It also had a tremendous effect on the framers of the Confederate Constitution that they thought it was necessary to write into their Constitution a clause that forever settled the issue of protective tariffs within their new country. Unlike the Federal Constitution, which requires a supermajority of states to call for an amendment, the Confederate Constitution only requires three states to call for an amendment to be brought up before a national convention

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slavery was very prominent in the south, and in order to please southern states, the founding fathers allowed slave trade to continue until 1808 (which wouldn't be in effect until 20 years after the constitution was ratified). Some of the framers themselves owned slaves, however they understood this was not a good thing for the country. They had to appease the south, because if they just banned slavery then the south would have not ratified the constitution. The founding fathers began to see tension between abolitionists and proslavery supporters, thus fearing a division between the two. The framers attempted to create early unity between the two, however it crumbled leading to the civil war.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and South in the nineteenth century were different in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton was king. Because of this, congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not satisfy either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just fell short. Among those were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Great Compromise of 1850. Other tempestuous attempts led to the Tariff/Nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the other, there was always someone to oppose - and in some cases, defy - the laws put in place, which eventually led to the succession of the southern states and the Civil War.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It has been rare in American history for presidents and vice-presidents not to get along, but it has happened on a few occasions: Adams and Jefferson, Kennedy and Johnson, and Eisenhower and Nixon are a few examples (Jackson vs. Calhoun-Part 1 1). However, the most controversial relationship between president and his assistant was between Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun. Their disagreements began very early on in Jackson's administration, and lasted until after the resolution of the Nullification Crisis. Nullification is the refusal of a state to recognize a federal law within its boundaries and deem that law unconstitutional. In this case, South Carolina, led by John C. Calhoun, refused to recognize the protective tariffs in 1828, and 1832, saying that they benefited the North and injured the South. At this point in time, the American system of government was fairly new and the struggle between state and federal power was in full swing. Towards the end of the crisis, Calhoun went so far as to threaten to secede from the Union to show Jackson and the rest of America that individual state governments were indeed powerful. When the quarrel had reached its peak, Jackson had had enough and decided it was time to put an end to the crisis. The actions and decisions made by President Andrew Jackson in regards to John C. Calhoun and the Nullification Crisis not only enabled the Union to remain together, but proved the power of the federal government.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal power had been expanding ever since George Washington was voted first President of the United States in 1789. Since then, the Whiskey Rebellion was quelled with force in 1794, Jefferson had gone against the Constitution by buying the Louisiana territory in 1803, and the judiciary branch “extended its authority over the province of state courts, again reducing the power of the states.” (insert citation here) Tariffs issued by the federal government, too, had been expanding and angering the South – starting back again in the year Washington stepped into office when the very first Tariff Act was passed. The Tariff Act of 1789 raised revenue through tariffs on imported goods. Then, the Tariff of 1816, the United States tariff structure changed from revenue producing to protectionist. Following this, the Tariff of Abominations prompted angry southerners to protest, going as far as to publish a pamphlet called The South Carolina Exposition. This pamphlet candidly suggested that the states nullify the tariff. Soon after, Congress’s new Tariff of 1832 rekindled the fire that was southern nationalism, taking another step along the road of the Nullification Crisis. More federal involvement came with the…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict between the North and South was inevitable by the time Lincoln gave his first inaugural address because several Southern states had seceded from the union and because Lincoln would not have maintained the status quo for long. For a good two decades, the United States had been experiencing more and more turmoil over slavery. The Republican North was emphatically against slavery, viewing it as an evil abomination, while the Democratic South viewed it as integral to the Southern tradition. Northerners bannered together in the name of justice, while Southerners rallied to preserve their way of life. Feeling that their entire culture was gravely threatened, Southerners became more and more organized and militant, culminating in South Carolina’s secession from the United States of America on December 20, 1860.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The document was a protest against the Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations. The document stated that if the tariff was not repealed, South Carolina would break from the United States. It stated also Calhoun's Doctrine of nullification, the idea that a state has the right to reject federal law..…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout American history, one can see from a chain of events why certain interactions have been constructed. As for the North and the South, they exhibited their differences before the 1860's, and it was from their clashing viewpoints that started the Civil War. However, this war did more than prove their contrasting goals, as it showed the diversities between the two. Politically and economically, the North and South changed dramatically due to the Civil War.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The South had a vested interest in not allowing the federal government to interfere with their state rights. The South claimed the federal government is prohibited by the tenth amendment-which implies the federal government is limited to only the powers granted in the constitution-and that the federal government can't take away their "property," or in other words their slaves. This led to the idea of nullification,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners felt that the Federal government was passing laws, such as import taxes, that treated them unfairly. They believed that individual states had the right to "nullify", or overturn, any law the Federal government passed. They also believed that individual states had the right to leave the United States and form their own independent country. Most people in the North believed that the concepts of "nullification" and "states ' rights" would make the United States a weaker country and were against these ideas. (“Causes of Civil War,” 2005)…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1850, John C. Calhoun asked the question, “What is it that has endangered the Union?” in his speech "The Clay Compromise Measures," and continued on to say, “...the immediate cause is the almost universal discontent which pervades all the States composing the Southern section of the Union... It commenced with the agitation of the slavery question and has been increasing ever since.” Slavery was one of the most important causes of the succession of the Southern states and the Civil War. It was a topic often discussed and feelings towards it were greatly divided between the North and South. Despite the fact that the act of slavery was morally wrong many Americans (Mainly southerners) believed it was necessary and did not feel that the African Americans were equals. This belief had caused disagreements for far too long and slowly began to…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 20th, 1860 this was made a reality with South Carolina seceding. After this even it cause 6 more states to secede from the Union. In February 18611 the seven seceded states created a constitution and they became known as the “Confederate States of America”. This is where the inevitability of the Civil War starts. The North and the South had way too many differences to be able to get along with one another.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To add on, there were some laws that made the North and the South angry at each other. One of the more famous laws was included in the Compromise of 1850. That law was the Fugitive Slave Act and it stated that the northerners have to capture and return any slave that escapes to the North. One slave by the name of Dred Scott was famous for going to the North, only to be sent back to the south thus suing for his freedom. The Chief Justice at the time, Roger Taney, said that Scott couldn’t sue because Scott…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American Civil War

    • 6924 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Conflict grew in the 19th century between the northern and southern states over the issue of slavery. The northern states were going through an industrial revolution and desperately needed more people to work in its factories. Industrialists in the North believed that, if freed, the slaves would leave the South and provide the labour they needed. The North also wanted tariffs on imported foreign goods to protect their new industries. The South was still mainly agricultural and purchased a lot of goods from abroad and was therefore against import tariffs.…

    • 6924 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tariffs on Imports

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In simplest terms, a tariff is a tax. It adds to the cost of imported goods and is one of several trade policies that a country can enact.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays