Preview

South Carolina Exposition and Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
302 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
South Carolina Exposition and Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
The South Carolina Exposition and Protest, also known as Calhoun's Exposition, was written in 1828 by John C. Calhoun, the Vice President of the United States under Andrew Jackson.
The document was a protest against the Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations. The document stated that if the tariff was not repealed, South Carolina would break from the United States. It stated also Calhoun's Doctrine of nullification, the idea that a state has the right to reject federal law..

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions (or Resolves) were important political statements in favor of states' rights written secretly by Vice President Thomas Jefferson (who would later become president) and James Madison in 1798. They were passed by the two states in opposition to the federal Alien and Sedition Acts. Though often mentioned as a pair in modern historical discussions, they were actually two separate documents. The Kentucky Resolutions were written by Jefferson and passed by the state legislature on November 16, 1798, with one more being passed the following year on December 3, 1799. The Virginia Resolutions were written by Madison and passed by the state legislature on December 24, 1798. Jefferson and Madison collaborated on the writing of the two documents, but their authorship was not known for many years. The resolutions attacked the Sedition Acts, which extended the powers of the federal government over individuals inside the states. The resolutions declared that the Constitution was a "compact." That is, it was an agreement among the states. The federal government had no right to exercise powers not specifically delegated to it; should the federal government assume such powers, its acts under them would be void. Thus it was the right of the states to decide as to the constitutionality of such laws passed by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the years before his presidency, Thomas Jefferson was an anti-Federalist who believed in strict- construction of the Constitution. After the constitutional convention had taken place, Thomas Jefferson petitioned against the ratification of the newly written document, the Constitution. Jefferson also argued for a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. In a letter to James Madison Jefferson called for a Bill of Rights because it provided "freedom of religion, freedom of the press, protection against standing armies, ... and trials by jury in all matters triable by the law." In 1800, Jefferson, along with Madison, wrote the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions to campaign against John Adams after the Alien and Sedition acts were passed. The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions proved Jefferson's strict-constructionism by combating the Federalist theory of a government's "implied powers" and they were written to stop the expansion of power of the government after they had passed two unconstitutional laws. In August of 1800, Jefferson once again expressed his previous beliefs of strict-construction in a letter to Gideon Granger; Jefferson said that America could never be in a state of harmony if citizens…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Compare and contrast the similarities and differences among the southern colonies of Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution was an unclear document on the issue of slavery which caused sectional discord. There was no direct address on the topic of slavery, and this opened up the opportunity for the north and the south to interpret slavery in whatever way it benefitted them the most. After expansion began to occur it was a disputed topic on whether territories were able to have slavery or not. The Compromise of 1850 somewhat made the situation clearer by stating which territories could and could not have slavery, but popular sovereignty made this compromise not as useful because pro and against slave populations moved into the territory just to declare slave or slave free. Although the compromise stated where slavery was allowed it did not help clarify who or what could be consider a slave because the constitution says “we” and is not really clear who is a part of “we”. (Americans 82 89) The article “Plain Words for the North” demonstrates how the people who wrote and drafted the constitution did not believe that not addressing slavery would turn into such a big controversy, by stating, “Flagrant violations of the plainest rules of right and wrong were committed.” The constitution was written by White Northerners which is one of the reasons for argument.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a purpose for papers such as these, and the purpose here was to allay the fears of the people; the fear that this new Constitution wouldn’t work, the fear that there was no solution to the political instability the Articles of Confederation had, and the fear that the government would be too strong or controlling. The political instability at the time scared people because factions, (groups with common political interests that forced their opinions on others while disregarding…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Letter from the Rhode Island Assembly to Congress on November 30, 1782 was just one of the several statements disapproving of the Confederation. Document A is saying that the U.S. government is stripping the liberties of the states. Spending the money from the states and spending it on things the…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Virginia and Kentucky resolutions were passed in 1798. These resolutions were written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The two resolutions were protests of civil liberties to not put the Alien and Sedition rights into play.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America and France’s alliance had badly deteriorated after the French Revolution came to a completion in the late 1790s. In fear of a war with France and political turmoil surfacing in America, the Federal Congress passed four laws in 1798, signed by President John Adams, that came to be known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. These laws became a source of bitter controversy across the country, causing many to be furious and claim that the acts violated their personal liberties such as the right to free speech. Others, however, sought to defend the decrees and prove that they were constitutional, affecting only foreigners and those who were conspiring against the government. President Adams’s secretary of state, Timothy Pickering, argued that the laws would not have an effect on American citizens, so there was no need for concern (as stated in Timothy Pickering Upholds the Representative Laws.) James Madison, who would later become the fourth president of the United States, drafted The Virginia Legislative Protests in 1798, which declared that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional and would be abolished.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the Unites States Constitution, Jackson attempted to act as a guardian; but he only protected its content when it benefited his popularity or ran parallel with his stances on governmental issues. Jackson was most definitely disappointed with his vice president, John Calhoun, when he emerged as the leader of the states’ rights uprising in South Carolina. As outlined in document F, they were ready and willing to deny enforcement of any federal law or the upholding of any constitutional right that negatively affected their state. Most Jacksonians denounced South Carolina’s demand for the right to nullify federal laws as treasonous. When South Carolina mentioned nullification of the “tariff of abominations,” Jackson tried to appease the Southerners, by loosening the tariff so as to make it more favorable for the South, in order to avoid their future use of nullification. This illustrated his attempt to uphold the federal powers outlined in the constitution and prevent individual states from claiming rights not granted to them. In addition, Jackson followed strict construction of the…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jefferson's resolution for Kentucky, he went even further by declaring that ultimate sovereignty rested with the states, which empowered them to reject federal laws to which they objected. He stated, "To their resolutions passed at the last session, respecting certain unconstitutional laws of Congress, commonly called the alien and sedition laws, would be faithless indeed to themselves, and to those they represent,…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a very significant document because it is documentation of the first state to secede from the United States. The other states that seceded after South Carolina followed the example set by South Carolina and used roughly the same reasoning as to why they were seceding too. These states would then form the Confederate States of America and fight the United States in a civil war. This document best represents the mentality of the South around the date of March, 1861, because it shows the fear the South felt of the North. They were afraid that the North's abolitionist and antislavery way of life would supersede the South’s slave-dependant way of life. The South’s economy heavily depended on the use of slaves while the North was much more industrialized and did not require the heavy labor usually reserved for slaves, so many northern states abolished slavery. If this happened in the South, the large plantation owners were afraid that they would no longer have the power, money, or influence that they once had. This fearful mentality was rampant in the South and South Carolina was the first to act on it through this…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the great American history, Americans have been through a colossal amount of conflicts, and wars. However, they still figured out a way to compromise and accept each other’s differences. As America improves, they gradually lead to a making of a powerful and organized government. Yet in “South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification” a conflict arises, where South Carolina is furious at the federal government and wants the best for themselves. Like many other states South Carolina is one of which that had its own negative opinions towards the federal government, leading to a larger problem. The document “South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification” both supports and contradicts American and constitutional principles.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Calhoun thought that because slavery has been a part of society for so long suddenly putting and it too it would cause chaos within the society. “Too maintain the existing relations between the two races, inhabiting that section of the Union, is indispensable to the peace and happiness of both. It cannot be subverted without drenching the county in blood, and extirpating one or the other of the races. Be it good or bad, it has grown up with our society and institutions, and is so interwoven with them, that to destroy it would be to destroy us as a people (Calhoun)”. Calhoun thought that by keeping the institution of slavery around it would continue to keep the balance in…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans were going at one another. Neither side even trying to budge to understand what the other side was thinking or trying to say. The federalists were fighting for these laws to be passed which they ended up passing because they won the majority of the electoral votes. The Anti-federalists were furious they could not see how they were going to completely disobey the first amendment. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were anti-federalist and they opposed these acts. They decided to come up with plans to take to congress that would completely invalidate these four acts. Virginia and Kentucky passed their settlements. After their resolutions were passed they started to get backlash from the federalists. They were trying to make them look bad and threaten them because they did not like their resolution so the two argued that the states could go their own way. These are now known as the Virginia and Kentucky Resolves. The political atmosphere was so heated during this time frame because so many people had different opinions about who was right and who was wrong and when someone or two people who did not agree with james adams or congress and came up with resolutions it caused the alien and sedition acts to become…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union was a legal proclamation issued on December 24, 1860 by the government of South Carolina. The justification was published in the "Causes of Secession" document. This document went more in-depth than just the state's rights argument that is often cited. South Carolina’s stated reasons for seceding from the United States was because of the new Republican administration being against slavery and the federal government not protecting South Carolina’s property rights that were given in the 5th Amendment. "Not protecting natural rights (life, liberty, and property)“.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Nullification Crisis

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Yet, in 1828 Jackson ran for President and won. The tariff was not passed until that year, and it backfired on Jackson. When it went into effect, the South was enraged about it and the economy was failing. The tariff they originally proposed was no longer supported by Jacksonian’s, and they did not support Jackson himself. South Carolina rallied heavily against the tariff, and supported their arguments with principles taken from the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Also, they supported their case by arguing that the Constitution allowed them individually as a state to nullify federal laws for the whole union. They published “The South Carolina Exposition” which was written by John C. Calhoun, the Vice…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays