Preview

John C. Calhoun and The Problem With Southern Nationalism Rough Draft

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John C. Calhoun and The Problem With Southern Nationalism Rough Draft
Disunity in Post 1812 America

Shortly after the War of 1812 had ended under Madison’s reign, America had come to a period popularly known as the “Era of Good Feelings.” The Americans had just come out of a great battle, emerging victorious, thus proving themselves to be a competent world power. However, although the time period after the War of 1812 was dubbed the “Era of Good Feelings,” growing tension due to a sudden rise of southern nationalism under John C. Calhoun, too much involvement from the government, and disagreements over slavery created such disunion that the nation descended into utter chaos. The so-called “Era of Good Feelings” was, in fact, a misnomer – not only was it not a time of good feelings, but it was actually a period of great disunion.
Federal power had been expanding ever since George Washington was voted first President of the United States in 1789. Since then, the Whiskey Rebellion was quelled with force in 1794, Jefferson had gone against the Constitution by buying the Louisiana territory in 1803, and the judiciary branch “extended its authority over the province of state courts, again reducing the power of the states.” (insert citation here) Tariffs issued by the federal government, too, had been expanding and angering the South – starting back again in the year Washington stepped into office when the very first Tariff Act was passed. The Tariff Act of 1789 raised revenue through tariffs on imported goods. Then, the Tariff of 1816, the United States tariff structure changed from revenue producing to protectionist. Following this, the Tariff of Abominations prompted angry southerners to protest, going as far as to publish a pamphlet called The South Carolina Exposition. This pamphlet candidly suggested that the states nullify the tariff. Soon after, Congress’s new Tariff of 1832 rekindled the fire that was southern nationalism, taking another step along the road of the Nullification Crisis. More federal involvement came with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From the ashes of the Civil War, rose a unified nation still embroiled with one another over memory. David Blight argues in Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory that “[s]ome of the real war, and much of an imagined one, was already getting into the books.” A fierce battle of words and history dominates the post-war landscape. “Civil War memory had become a creature of the mass market,” Blight argues, “and like all markets, it produced winners and losers.” As the South endeavored to reconnect with their pre-war way of states’ rights and negro bondage, the north, through reconstruction, attempted to pummel the old southern way of life into submission. However, as reconstruction neared its end in 1877, the South emerged ready to…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the treaty we acquire territory; therefore, the treaty is unconstitutional.” (Doc A) however, ironically, the federalists were known for having a loose interpretation of the constitution, and, instead, Jefferson was the one who had a hard time with the strict interpretation of the constitution on the issue. Other excuses brought up by the federalists against the issue of the Louisiana purchase were the threat that the, now bordering, Spanish now posed against the United States due to the standing army that Spain had, and because it would “destroy with a single operation the whole weight and importance of the eastern states”. Despite the opposition by the federalists, Jefferson was able to pass the Louisiana Purchase in congress, as the benefits of the extreme bargain far outweighed the excuses that the federalists were offering; thus, giving many citizens the hoped of a new beginning in the west and the start of the westward expansion. Although the war of 1812 did not acquire more land for the United States, it helped to clear the way for expansion by removing the British from United States territory, thus clearing the way for American expansion. Not only did the war remove the British but it also led to the demise of the Federalist…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Veto of Maysville Road Bill, Indian Removal Act of 1830, Ordinance of Nullification, Veto of Recharter of Second Bank of the United States…

    • 490 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of Jefferson’s presidential term, the two American parties had very defined political views. The Democratic-Republicans believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution and in limiting the power of the federal government, while the Federalists supported a broad view of the Constitution and wanted to give as much power to the federal government as possible. So while Jefferson was president, he promptly removed Hamilton’s excise tax and created the Naturalization Law of 1802. He said to Gideon Granger in 1800, “Our country can never be harmonious and solid while so respectable a portion of its citizens support principles which go directly to a change of the federal Constitution, to sink the state governments, consolidate them into one, and to monarchise that.” (Doc A) However, Jefferson was known to be “consistently inconsistent”. The Louisiana Purchase, as well as the war and peace treaty with Tripoli, proved that he was willing to…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s inauguration in 1800 lead to the defeat of the Federalists and the resurrection of republican control. The Judiciary Act of 1801 expanded and packed the Judicial branch with Federalists. The case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) led to the creation of judicial review, which allowed the Supreme Court to rule previous decisions unconstitutional and go against them. Jefferson strengthened forces in the Mississippi through Lewis and Clark’s expedition during his first term. Napoleon also offered him the whole of Louisiana, doubling the size of the United States for $15 million. American trade flourished from 1793-1807. The Chesapeake Incident in June 1807 ceased trade with the British after an attack on an American ship. In place of a declaration of war, the Embargo Act of 1807 was proposed, forbidding trade with any nation.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But then the tariff did pass after all. Vice President John C. Calhoun of South Carolina anonymously wrote an “Exposition and Protest” of the Tariff of 1828, which became known as the “Tariff of Abominations.” When a tariff bill passed again in 1832, because it was still too high to suit the needs of Southern agricultural interests, the State of South Carolina decided to nullify the tariff. They took their action very deliberately, calling a special convention and passing an “Ordinance of Nullification” that claimed not only that the tariff was not enforceable in South Carolina, but that any attempt to enforce it by state or federal officials would not be permitted within South…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Caldwell Calhoun was born march 18, 1782 in South Carolina, Calhoun was conceived, and instructed at Yale College. From 1808 to 1810 a monetary subsidence hit the United States and Calhoun understood that British arrangements were destroying the economy. He served in South Carolina's governing body and was chosen to the United States House of Representatives serving three terms. In 1812, Calhoun and Henry Clay, two acclaimed "warhawks", who favored war to the "putrescent pool of ignominous peace", persuaded the House to announce war on Great Britian. Calhoun was secretary of war under President James Monroe from 1817 to 1825 and kept running for president in the 1824 race alongside four others, John Q. Adams, Henry Clay, Crawford, and…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If one person could be called the instigator of the Civil War, it was John C. Calhoun -- Unknown.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aftermath of the war of 1812 was an explosion of nationalistic feelings. Many believed that it was a second war for independence, even though the war was mainly a stalemate. The election of James Monroe to the presidency in 1816 was often called the Era of Good Feelings. The new sense of pride destroyed old political barriers by lessoning voter requirements. This united Americans behind the common goal of improving the nation. The nation was so unified that Monroe ran uncontested for a second term in 1820.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though the Union and Confederate soldiers both fought for the victory of their nations, each side had its own reasoning and purpose for doing so. Soldiers relied on their families from home and in battle for encouragement. They wanted to fight not only for their nation, but for their family at home. They didn't want to let them down, alongside of their nation. Their family in regiments was just as beloved. They all felt the same pain and pride, therefore becoming closer to one another. They'd watch each other win and watch each other die. Backing out of it was the last thing they wanted to do and be considered a coward. Soldiers had rather die of honor than live a coward. They were all in it together and that bond with each other kept them from giving up. The leaves that were given gave those enlisted a break from the soldier life for a short period, which was a great privilege. The problem was that the leaves were abused and soldiers wouldn't come back when their time was up, therefore being a deserter. The government wasn't in control enough to do anything about the deserters.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    George Washington, elected the first president in 1789, set up a cabinet form of government, with departments of State, Treasury, and War, along with an Attorney General (the Justice Department was created in 1870). Based in New York, the new government acted quickly to rebuild the nation's financial structure. Enacting the program of Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, the government assumed the Revolutionary war debts of the states and the national government, and refinanced them with new federal bonds. It paid for the program through new tariffs and taxes; the tax on whiskey led to a revolt in the west; Washington raised an army and suppressed it. The nation adopted a Bill of Rights as 10 amendments to the new constitution. The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the entire federal judiciary, including the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court became important under the leadership of Chief Justice John Marshall (1801–1834), Federalist and nationalist who built a strong Supreme Court and strengthened the national government. The 1790s were highly contentious, as the First Party System emerged in the contest between Alexander Hamilton and his Federalist party, and Thomas Jefferson and his Republican party. Washington and Hamilton were building a strong national government, with a broad financial base, and the support of merchants and financiers throughout the country. Jeffersonians opposed the new national Bank, the Navy, and federal taxes. The Federalists favored Britain, which was embattled in a series of wars with France. Jefferson's victory in 1800 opened the era of Jeffersonian democracy, and doomed the upper-crust Federalists to increasingly marginal roles. The Louisiana Purchase from Napoleon, in 1803 opened vast Western expanses of fertile land, that exactly met the needs of the rapidly expanding population of yeomen farmers whom Jefferson championed. The Americans declared war on Britain (the War of 1812) to uphold American honor at sea, and to end the Indian…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1920's Dbq

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Following the First World War, the United States went in search of a, “return to normalcy,” which many agreed was exactly what it needed. However, to the dismay of many, all the United States could find was a significant amount of tension that had developed between, “Old America,” and, “New America.” All in all, this tension that arose between old and new traditions and ideas did so in the form of religion, conflicts within society, and cultural values.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun supported slavery because he believed that it was beneficial to the states in order for them to become prosperous. Because of that belief, Calhoun stated that it is up to individual states to protect the existence of slavery in order to keep moving forward. Another idea he brings up is that slaves should never be equal to white American citizens. If there were to be two free races, both of equal size, one will always have to be subjective to the other. Basically, he believed that it would be virtually impossible for all races to ever be truly equal to each other. This really just enforces the idea that many people held in America that white people will always be superior to everyone.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism didn’t really go with the time period of the “Era of good feeling.” We had the…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays