After meeting the basic needs of food, clothing and shelter is being sought to make men different courses in life they do bring happiness. Day and night for a few moments of happiness and pain, transient and satisfaction, it will be ready to go to them for life routine, which may not give them any joy. This is the pursuit of happiness. I have pondered this dilemma for groups of therapists, teachers, and spiritual gatherings.
With the promise to follow the path of spirituality, and of looking inward, and integration with the meaning in words and ideas and work, to achieve this supreme bliss. Religions tend to be regular institutions for peace and happiness, through the exploitation of religion, meditation, mantra, prayer, yoga, which aimed to life at the present time, as well as life after death.
Even though happiness is the ideal of heavenly felicity, I agree that you can find happiness in anything that you do because you can find happiness spending time with your family, socializing, and in everyday living with positivity, although happiness can come in forms of pleasure or good feelings.
Living in the world, “the good life” is mainly a matter of perspective. Given the right background and a good dose of luck, most creatures tend to do well, or at least to succeed in their terms: that’s basically how they’re wired. On the contrary, put a typical creature in the wrong setting and—good luck or no—it is lost, pretty much assured a quick death. For perhaps the majority of life forms, almost every place on earth is “the wrong situation”. Not so, it seems, for Homo sapiens, a species so adaptable that its members can flourish just about anywhere, probably including space. This is not because they‘re hard to kill, like cockroaches and rats, but because they are clever. Though rather needy in purely physical terms, these tropical primates have a remarkable talent for production whatever environment they find themselves in to suit their purposes. Impressed by their seemingly boundless inventiveness, many of them, at least in the brief era leading up to the twenty-first century, have thought that their species largely rise above context. For its followers really need only one thing: freedom, including the means needed to hunt their goals. Give them that, and they’ll take care of themselves just fine. If a person needs something that can be gotten, she will naturally figure out what that is and either secure it for herself or enter into obliging arrangements with others—banks, for instance—to get it. Given, that is, sufficient freedom to make of her life what she will. While their efforts at advancement building have tended to meet with mixed results, there is cause for optimism in the amazing gains in longevity and the standard of living that were achieved for a large portion of the classes in the decades preceding this analysis—due in no small measure to the progress of freedom.
The idea that freedom is what human beings essentially need to have their best shot at prosperity is a dominant belief of modern liberal thought. Since it is certain that human beings are in some sense a freedom-loving class, an important question is how “freedom” is to be understood here. Liberal newness has tended to view freedom mainly as self-willpower, floridly conceived: to a first ballpark figure, the ability to shape our lives in unity with our own priorities. This conception gets its most persuasive constant expression in Mill’s justly ad- mired On Liberty. Here is a recent statement of one of its central elements. Defending a child’s right to an “open future” in a discussion of Amish educational practices, Joel Feinberg writes that an “education should equip the child with the knowledge and skills that will help him choose whichever sort of life best fits his native endowment and matured disposition. It should send him out into the adult world with as many open opportunities as possible, thus maximizing his...