Preview

The Organ Of The Mind: A Philosophical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Organ Of The Mind: A Philosophical Analysis
According to the Dixon, Religious believers do not understand why human beings, created in God’s image, has been claim by scientist as evolved from apes with mushrooms for cousins. Dixon further explain that since 19th century, one thing that have cause challenges to religious beliefs is the scientific claim of ‘the soul’ as a product of brain activity. Religious believers disagree with this claim because the claim made the soul being as products of materialism, determinism, and blank atheism, which they think it, is not true. Furthermore believes have the view that human consciousness, morality, and religion itself is supernatural accounts so it cannot be explained as natural phenomena. Dixon turn is focus on the soul and immortality. He explain …show more content…
Some Jewish teachers is that hell punishment will be a temporary prelude to eternal bliss. Dixon then discusses issues relating to the brain and mind. According to Dixon, the claim made by scientists in beginning of the 19th century that “the brain is the organ of the mind” raise a question that “if the brain is a product of the mind, how is it possible for an immortal soul to exist.”(p.106) However, phrenology studies reveal that “the different parts of the brain under the ‘bumps’ on the skull were correlated with different mental traits.” Although many scientists since then have raised questions as to the detail methods phrenology of conclusions were wrong, however the basic ideas of that mental functions do correlate with different parts of the brain, seems to be fruitful. In the 1860s, Paul Broca discovered the frontal lobes ( Broca’s area) of the brain, which he believe is responsible for speech production. Dixon goes on to explain that recent studies on brain activity involved in religious experiences, but neurological explanation rules out a supernatural or religious …show more content…
Religious believers have the view that mind and morality is for supernatural accounts and it cannot be explained as natural phenomena while scientist believe that can be explained as natural phenomena and has nothing to do with religious experience or supernatural. Other thing I have to know is that scientists want to proof that “the brain is the organ of the mind” which means it is a material thing, which control human morality therefore it is natural and not supernatural accounts as religious people,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 3 “Tools of the Mind”, by Nicholas Carr describes the development of maps, clocks and other innovative advancements through the years and how it has changed the way we communicate with each other. Scientific technology has affected the progress of society and improved the history of individual’s awareness. However, with modern technologies individuals are continuing to learn and progress with the present-day innovations. At the beginning of the chapter Carr describes the drawings and creativity of a child and how she is inspired by her art and later became a surveyor. Maps can influence logical and cognitive abilities.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examine and comment on the claim that the mind and body are the same, with reference to the topic you have investigated.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind-Body Dualism

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans seem to be an entity made up by a combination of both physical properties and mental properties. Folk psychology of soul proposed by Bering (2006) suggested “common-sense mind-body dualism” is a cognitive adaptation that evolved through natural selection. According to this quote, it is believed that individual is fundamentally constituted of body, mind and volition. For centuries, people have tried to discover what makes an individual from philosophical, psychological and physiological perspectives. At different stages of this knowledge in understanding human beings, behaviourism, humanism and the study of consciousness will be critically evaluated in this discussion.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Article is based on facts and applied research. Im not a scientist so I cant agree or disagree. However I do find it baffling that there is so much study of the brain that goes unseen. Its unbelieved to think how many hours, days, months researchers put in time to find or come up with different ways to uncover the brain. I think I…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secrets of the Mind

    • 401 Words
    • 1 Page

    The brain “runs” our body, and has complete control of everything from muscle movement to our ability to study and remember the material. In some cases, it controls limbs that are not even there. This is known as phantom limb syndrome. The patient in the study can feel the limb, even though it is not there. In tests that were done, it is believed that there may be a cross-wiring of the neuropathways. The path that controls the amputated arm is sending out signals, but is not receiving any back, so it keeps sending more signals. This resending of the signals over and over causes pain to the patient that feels like it is in the arm that is not there. To alleviate the pain, the doctor puts the patient’s good arm in a box; next to it is a mirror where the amputated arm would be. The patient clenches and unclenches his arm, while looking at the mirror. The brain is basically tricked to stop sending signals, so the patient is relieved of the pain.…

    • 401 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mind-Body problem

    • 1454 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many theories have been challenged throughout the history of psychology. Mind vs. Body is one of the most important issues that has formed the basic foundation in this field today. One of the central questions in psychology and philosophy concerns the mind-body problem: Is the mind part of the body, or the body part of the mind? If they are distinct, then how do they interact? And which of the two is in charge? (McLeod, 2007). Philosophers have examined the relationship between the two and have proposed a variety of approaches to support their arguments.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay will discuss about the mind and brain identity theory. This theory outlines the relationship how human mind and the brain function in attribute to neural brain processes. This theory can be said to be a version of materialism which is a type of state a materialist would consider the consciousness or human mind to be brain processes. All emotions felt by the human mind such as sadness, anger, pain, love can all be said to be merely a physical interpretation of a stimulus and signal of the brain (P. Lloyd, 1953). There has been much debate as to the significance of the mind in comparison to the brain as such that is the mind a mere less side effect of brain processes. At least, whether the mind really has a purpose on the influence of behaviour. However we do speak of the mind and brain as distinct…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Brain

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Begin your paper here. Double space the entire document and be sure that you put two spaces between each sentence. Indent the first line of each paragraph between five and seven spaces by pressing the Tab key one time on the keyboard. Start with a strong introduction that includes a thesis statement (what the point of the paper is).…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soul Narrative Analysis

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in the sharp contrast to popular opinion, the current scientific consensus of psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science rejects any notion of soul or spirit as separate from the activity of the brain because of the lack of physical andinvestigatable evidence of an immaterial entity being a part of a human organism.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The religious beliefs can be broken down into three statements. The first statement is that people believe that there is god, and every soul created by god is human. The second statement people may believe is that they also believe in god but that a human is not created until birth. The third statement people may believe is that they do not believe in god, or souls. The philosophic theory believes that a human is created when a heart beat is present, or when there is brain function. The biologic theory is one…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion and Logic

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Instead of being incompatible with each other, religion, referring to human being’s thought about what a human being is and why, provides some perceptual knowledge to us while logic, referring to both the study of modes of reasoning (which are valid and which are fallacious) and the use of valid reasoning[1], gives us rational view about what a human being is, thus, helping us to become more human being.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primitive

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to understand and reflect on religion development on humanity it’s important to start at the end of ones life then the beginning. This comes to terms with the description of Stone Age practices of burials. It’s at one end of life that someone seeks spirituality for guidance. Through the reading we are brought through each step in prehistoric cultures to find the link to religion. These links can be found in archeologist finds on paintings, clay figurines and engravings. These’s symbols left behind are like pieces of a puzzle yet to be unsolved. Though each pieces discovered we can try to relate the message the have left. Through the help of clues left behind we we’re able to base our selves on certain terminology to pin point characteristics of primal religion.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science vs Religion

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Science and religion both have their different own meanings. Science basically deals with the study of nature and how it processes and develops. It is based on the analysis of evidence. Its typically a hypothesis by scientists that processes events that happen or have happened due to natural causes. It has rarely cuts into matters of morality, the existence and nature of god and, spirituality. This exclusion is in a state to how the universe even started. Religion deals more with matters of faith. Its main basis is often disclosure from a god, either exposed to individuals through prayer, passed on from generation to generation, or shown in a sacred text. Most faith groups teach of the existence of one or more gods/or goddesses who created the universe, and continue to play a major role in controlling it to create miracles. The important part of religion is to teach moral principles, mankind’s relationship to the god/goddesses, and behavior towards other human beings. Science is betrothed in searching for universal principles that explain the facts of nature just like religion is. Many people feel very strong about their religious tradition and feel like whatever it is that they believe in is absolutely true no questions asked, whereas science and all other faiths are artificial belief systems, invented by scientific humans. These two differences in attitude usually starts religious conflict, sometimes escalating into something even bigger. In result, different religious traditions go against each other, as well as not agreeing with the findings of…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Logic of Spirituality - Paper

    • 15790 Words
    • 64 Pages

    This wonderful and glorious world of plurality had been at all times a mystery, a temptation a, a conundrum. From the caveman to the modern scientist sitting amongst electronic equipment in the modern laboratories – ‗Where did it all come from?‘, ‗What is the source of this universe?‘, ‗What is happening all around?‘ – this kind of a question has been from time immemorial. Friends, from Adam and Eve onwards till today, we are still investigating. Sometimes our enquiry went into mysticism and religion, sometimes to superstition and sometimes to facts. But nowhere there is total satisfaction. Man wants to understand the world. This problem is not among the animals. Therefore philosophy and religion has never troubled the animal kingdom. It is only when you become the intelligent human being – then he starts this investigation – this enquiry – this curiosity to understand their world outside and a hundred questions arise in the bosom of every individual whether you are religious or not, whether you are scientific or not. If you are a human being, these questions cannot be avoided. This questioning ability in the human intellect that has brought about the entire - from the caveman to the modern man, all the progress that we have made are all that contribution of this human intellect investigative anxiety, to know - understand the world outside. All the objective scientists of the modern times are glorious people. But limited their approach to this problem. None of them are able to really find out - what is fundamental – it is not their fault. They were trying to understand it with their intellect, because that is the only toy that has been provided by the nature to the human beings. And we were fascinated by that toy and just as a child - when he gets a teddy bear first - he can‘t even sleep without a teddy bear. For few days nothing but the teddy bear day and night. So too we were so fascinated by the achievements and abilities and capacities…

    • 15790 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Good Essays