Preview

The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Dividend Policy of Japanese Firms with Free Cash Flow Problem

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4864 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Dividend Policy of Japanese Firms with Free Cash Flow Problem
The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Dividend Policy of Japanese Firms with Free Cash Flow Problem

Aristotelis Stouraitis Lingling Wu Department of Economics and Finance City University of Hong Kong September 16, 2004

* Contact information: Aristotelis Stouraitis (the author who will attend the conference and present the paper), Tel: (852) 2788 8450, Fax: (852)2788 8806, Email: efstoura@cityu.edu.hk. Lingling Wu, Tel: (852)2788 7393, Email: 50004340@student.cityu.edu.hk. Address : Department of Economics & Finance, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

-1-

The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Dividend Policy of Japanese Firms with Free Cash Flow Problem

Abstract This paper, using 986 observations of listed Japanese firms between the years 1992 to 2000, explore the implications of the free cash flow hypothesis concerning the disciplinary role of ownership structure in dividend policy. We find evidence in support of the hypothesis that a positive relation exists between dividends and free cash flow and it’s greater for low-growth firms than for the high-growth firms. The results also show that the impact of managerial ownership and bank ownership on dividend yield is positive particularly for the low growth firms. This is inconsistent with the view that the managerial ownership and institutional ownership reduce the need for the dividend mechanism. Finally, there is evidence that the Keiretsu classification affects relations between ownership structure and dividend payouts. Overall, the dividend policy appears to be used by Japanese low-growth firms to control the overinvestment problem. Free cash flow hypothesis is to some degree supported.

JEL classification codes: G32

G34

G35

Keywords: Ownership Structure, Dividend Policy, Free Cash Flow

-2-

1. Introduction Why does a firm pay dividends? This question has been the subject of debate for many years, In the pre-Miller and Modigliani era,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ly, K. (2010). Investor relations level and cost of capital: Evidence from Japanese firms. Asia –…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mini Case Chapter 17

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2) The terms “irrelevance,” and “dividend preference, or bird-in-the-hand,” and “tax effects” have been used to describe three major theories regarding the way dividend payout…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A. S. De Vany Department of Economics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717, USA e-mail: asdevany@uci.edu W. D. Walls (B ) Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N-1N4 e-mail: wdwalls@ucalgary.ca W. D. Walls School of Business and Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong…

    • 5022 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miller and Modigiliani (1961) prove that dividend policy is irrelevant to share value in perfect and efficient capital markets. In this setup, no rational investor has a preference between dividends and capital gains. However, dividend payout policy is still discussed extensively until now. In this proposal, I use a sample of companies from 33 countries around the world to shed light on the relationship among legal origin, insider holdings, corporate governance, and dividend payout policy. This idea mainly comes from Professor Shiu in corporate finance class at NCU.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy

    • 5995 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Badar Khalid Al Shabibi Faculty, Accounting & Finance, Department of Business Studies Ibra College of Technology, Sultanate of Oman E-mail: baderkh14@hotmail.com Tel: +968-95142254; Fax: +968-25587950 G Ramesh Faculty, Accounting & Finance, Department of Business Studies Ibra College of Technology, Sultanate of Oman E-mail: drrameshg@gmail.com Tel: +968-96149365; Fax: +968-25587950 Abstract This research aims to examine the factors which affect dividend policy for nonfinancial UK companies in the year 2007. In particular, the research examines the extent to which corporate governance factors affect corporate dividend policy. The factors are classified into two parts which are corporate governance factors and firm characteristics. Corporate governance factors include board size, board independence and audit type. On the other hand, firm characteristics are firm size, profitability, debt level, growth, risk, industry type and tangibility. The sources used to collect the data for this study are the Forecasting Analysis and Modelling Environment (FAME) database and annual reports. Multiple regression model is used to analyze the data. Based on the sample of 90 nonfinancial UK companies, it is found that corporate governance factors do affect the dividend policy. It seems that board independence is one of the important factors which drive firms to pay dividends. Furthermore, some of the firm characteristics have also influenced the dividend policy decision among the non-financial UK firms.…

    • 5995 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ABSTRACT The objective of this research is to examine the influences of earnings per share and dividend payout ratio to common stock holding period. The research was conducted at the companies listed in the LQ-45 Index in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2010. This type of study is a hypothesis-testing research. The research method used in this research is purposive sampling. Sample in this study are companies registered in the LQ-45 Index that have complete data for the variables studied. Sum of the sample is the 45 sample acquired during the three years of observation. Data collection techniques using secondary data from financial statements that have been audited and published and quantitative data obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (www.idx.co.id). Data is analysed by using multiple regression analysis. The results showed that (1) the earnings per share and dividend payout ratio simultaneously has not influence the holding period, (2) while the earnings per share partially has not influence on the holding period, and (3) dividend payout ratio has not influence on the holding period. Keywords: earnings per share, dividend payout ratio, holding period.…

    • 4049 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper improves on earlier research on stability and determinants of dividend policies by using a more advanced estimation methodology, a larger and more representative sample of panel data (PD), and different proxies for a longer time window 1971-2007. It is aimed to find whether the Indian private corporate sector follow stable cash dividend policies, whether dividends smoothen earnings in India, to estimate the implicit target payout ratio and speed of adjustment of dividends towards a long run target payout ratio. We further test applicability of dividend stability hypothesis and add to the relatively limited literature on aspects of dividend decision by examining the dynamics of relationship between dividend payouts and a host of other explanatory variables. We estimate the basic static PD model, GMM-in-Levels {GMM (in-Lev)} model, and its other variations GMM-in-first-differences {GMM (in-Diff)] and GMM-in-Systems {GMM (in-Sys)}so to include other lag structures. This procedure shows us how much the size of the dividend determinants, the speed of adjustment coefficient and the one of the implicit target payout ratio varies across the different estimation techniques. In addition, it will also be useful to compare our results with those of Pooled OLS-estimation with alternate data definitions for checking the robustness of the results.…

    • 10549 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    ISEAS Working Papers on Economics and Finance No. 1. Singapore: Institute of Southeast AsianStudies.Saw Swee-Hock & K.Kesavapany. (2006).…

    • 2368 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employing a unique data set provided by Governance Metrics International, which rates firms using six…

    • 6823 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Zhao et al, MZ, 2007. The Corporate Governance Model of Japan: Shareholders are not Rulers, [Online]. 1, 3-4. Available at: http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/~allenf/download/Vita/Japan-Corporate-Governance.pdf [Accessed 23 November 2010].…

    • 3181 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Koito

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In Japan the common shareholders as a whole elect the board of directors and have the ultimate legal control. Corporate Governance in Japan is strongly influenced by relationships:…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Artical

    • 4195 Words
    • 17 Pages

    “Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Capital Structure of Pakistani Listed Companies” International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 50-57. John J. McConnell and Henri Servaes, 1990. “Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value” Journal of Financial Economics 27, pp. 595-612. Jelinek, K., & Stuerke, 2009. P, “The Nonlinear Relation between Agency Costs and Managerial Equity Ownership: Evidence of Decreasing Benefits of Increasing Ownership”. International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 156-178. Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer, Robert W, Vishny, 1988. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics 20, pp. 293-315. Michael L. Lemmon and Karl V. Lins, 2003. “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crises”, The Journal of Finance Vol.LVIII No, 4. S. A. Zulfiqar Syed., WasimUllah, Hasnain Baqir, 2011. “Impact of ownership structure on dividend policy of firm (evidence from Pakistan)” IPEDR Vol.3, IACSIT Press, Hong Kong. Xiaonian Xu and Yan Wang, 1999. “Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies” China Economic Review 10, pp.75–98.…

    • 4195 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R. Azhagaiah Faculty Member, Department of Commerce Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for Post Graduate Studies (Autonomous) (Govt. of Puducherry) Affiliated to Pondicherry Central University Puducherry – 605 008, South India E-mail: drrazhagaia@ yahoo.co.in Tel: ++91-0413 – 2255017; Fax: ++91-0413-2251687 Sabari Priya .N Research Scholar, Department of Commerce Kanchi Mamunivar Centre for Post Graduate Studies (Autonomous) (Govt. of Puducherry) Affiliated to Pondicherry Central University Puducherry – 605 008, South India E-mail: sabari_pvsm@yahoo.co.in Tel: ++91-0413 – 2255017; Fax: ++91-0413-2251687 Abstract The present paper is aimed at analyzing the impact of dividend policy of shareholders’ wealth in Organic and Inorganic Chemical Companies in India during 1996 – 1997 to 2005-2006. To measure the impact of dividend policy on shareholders’ wealth multiple regression method and stepwise regression models are used by taking DPSit (Dividend per Share), RE it (Retained Earnings per Share), Pet-1 (Lagged Price Earning Ratio) and MPSit-1 (Lagged Market Price) (MVit-1) as independent variable, and MPSit (Market Price Per Share) as dependent variables. To determine the proportion of explained variation in the dependent variable, the co-efficient of determination (R2) has been tested with the help of F value. The study proves that the wealth of the shareholders is greatly influenced mainly by five variables viz., Growth in sales, Improvement of Profit Margin, Capital Investment Decisions (both working capital and fixed capital), Capital Structure Decisions, Cost of Capital (Dividend on Equity, Interest on Debt) etc. There is a significant impact of dividend policy on shareholders’ wealth in Organic Chemical Companies while the shareholders’ wealth is not…

    • 3664 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays