Preview

Mini Case Chapter 17

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1765 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mini Case Chapter 17
Mini Case Study
Chapter 17

By:

This assignment case was completed by me withouth any assistance

____________________________

A. 1) What is meant by the term “distribution policy”? How have dividend payout versus stock repurchase changed over time?
Distribution Policy involves three issues. 1) What fraction of earnings should be distributed? 2) Should the distribution be in the form of cash dividends or stock repurchases? 2) Should the firms maintain a steady, stable divided growth rate?
The dividend payout versus stock repurchase has changed dramatically during the past 30 years. First off the total cash distributions as a percentage of net income have remained the same fairly stable at around 26% to 28%, but the mix of dividends and repurchases has changed. The average dividend payout fell from 22.3% in 1974 to 13.8% in 1998, while the average repurchase payouts as a percentage of net income rose from 3.7% to 13.6%. Since 1985, large companies have repurchased more shares than they have issued. Ever since 1998, more cash has been returned to shareholders in repurchases then as dividend payouts. Second, companies today are less likely to pay a dividend. In 1978, about 66.5% of NYSE, AMEX, and Nasdaq firms paid a dividend. In 1999, only 20.8% paid a dividend. A portion of this reduction can be explained by the larger number of IPO’s in the 1990’s, since young firms rarely pay a dividend. Even though that doesn’t explain the whole story, as many mature firms now don’t pay dividends. Third is that relatively small number of older, more established, and more profitable firms accounts for most of the cash distributed as dividends and finally there is a considerable variation in distribution policies, as some companies pay a high percentage of their income as dividends and some pay none. 2) The terms “irrelevance,” and “dividend preference, or bird-in-the-hand,” and “tax effects” have been used to describe three major theories regarding the way dividend payout

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fin 516 Week 1 Homework

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. If the company follows a residual dividend policy, and maintains its 35% Debt level in its capital structure, and invests in the $12.0 Million capital budget in 2012, what would be the Residual Dividend level (in Dollars) in 2012? What would be this Residual Dividends payout ratio?…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Part 6

    • 970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    If management wants to maximize its stock price, and if it believes that the dividend irrelevance theory is correct, then it must adhere to the residual distribution policy.…

    • 970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F. 1961. Dividend Policy Growth and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business 34 (October): 411–33.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Decision

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    15.4 Dividend Irrelevance Theory: Miller and Modigliani Model 15.5 Stability of Dividends 15.6 Forms of Dividends 15.7 Stock Split 15.8 Summary Terminal Questions Answers to SAQs and TQs 15.1 Introduction Dividends are that portion of a firm’s net earnings paid to the shareholders. Preference shareholders are entitled to a fixed rate of dividend irrespective of the firm’s earnings. Equity holders’ dividends fluctuate year after year. It depends on what portion of earnings is to be retained by the firm and what portion is to be paid off. As dividends are distributed out of net profits, the firm’s decisions on retained earnings have a bearing on the amount to be distributed. Retained earnings constitute an important source of financing investment requirements of a firm. However, such opportunities should have enough growth potential and sufficient profitability. There is an inverse relationship between these two – larger retentions, lesser dividends and vice versa. Thus two constituents of net profits are always competitive and conflicting. Dividend policy has a direct influence on the two components of shareholders’ return – dividends and capital gains. A low payout and high retention may have the effect of accelerating earnings growth. Investors of growth companies realize their money in the form of capital gains. Dividend yield will be low for such companies. The influence of dividend policy on future capital gains is to happen in…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    n an article published in this journal a year ago, we reported the findings of our study of corporate financing and payout policies covering some 6,700 industrial companies over the past 30 years.1 Our analysis suggests that the most important systematic determinant of a company’s leverage ratio and dividend yield is the nature of its investment opportunities. Companies whose value consists largely of intangible growth options (as indicated by high market-to-book ratios and heavy R&D spending) have significantly lower leverage ratios and dividend yields, on average, than companies whose value is represented primarily by tangible assets (with low market-to-book ratios and high depreciation expense). We explained this pattern of financing and dividend choices as follows: For high-growth firms, the “underinvestment problem” associated with heavy debt financing and the flotation costs of high dividends make both policies potentially quite costly. But, for mature firms with limited growth opportunities, high leverage and dividends can have substantial benefits from controlling the “free cash flow” problem—the temptation of managers to overinvest in mature businesses or make diversifying acquisitions. (Taxes, too, may play a role in this pattern since low-growth companies are likely to be generating more taxable income and thus have greater use for interest tax shields. But, because there are important managerial incentive benefits as well as costs to having higher debt and dividends, companies would have optimal leverage and dividend ratios even in a world without income taxes.)…

    • 10526 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Myron Gordon and John Lintner believe that the required return on equity increases as the dividend payout ratio is decreased. Their argument is based on the assumption that…

    • 8840 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 14

    • 1558 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Your total portfolio value will be the total stock value plus the dividends received, so:…

    • 1558 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Finance

    • 5497 Words
    • 57 Pages

    the U.S. financial markets, still others had opportunistic reasons. Now, Ashley Swenson’s dividenddecision problem was compounded by the dilemma of whether to use company funds to pay…

    • 5497 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dickens, R.N., Casey, K.M. and Newman, J.A. (2003), ‘‘Bank dividend policy: explanatory factors’’, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 41 Nos. 1-2, pp. 3-13. Dutta, A.S., Collins, M.C. and Wansley, J.W. (2007), ‘‘Managerial ownership and dividend policy in the US banking industry’’, (under review, and a working paper available from the authors). Easterbrook, F.H. (1984), ‘‘Two agency-cost explanations of dividends,’’ American Economic Review, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 650-9. Fama, E.F. and Babiak, H. (1968), ‘‘Dividend policy: an empirical analysis’’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 63 No. 324, pp. 1132-61. Gorton, G. and Rosen, R. (1995), ‘‘Corporate control, portfolio choice, and the decline of banking’’, The Journal of Finance, pp. 1377-420. Goyal, A. and Welch, I. (2003), ‘‘Predicting the equity premium with dividend ratios’’, Management Science, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 639-54. Miller, M. and Rock, K. (1985), ‘‘Dividend policy under asymmetric information’’, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 1031-51. Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1988), ‘‘Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20 Nos. 1-2, pp. 293-315. Rozeff, M.S. (1982), ‘‘Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios’’, The Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 249-59. Wruck, K.H. (1989), ‘‘Equity ownership concentration and firm value: evidence from private equity financings’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 3-28. Corresponding author John Theis can be contacted at: theis_john@colstate.edu…

    • 4268 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dividend Policy

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We have considered the top five companies in Chemical sector based on their market capital structure and tried to analyze their dividend distribution. Based on our findings we have given interpretations on their dividend policy.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Dividend

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Figure 13A-1 illustrates the three alternative dividend policy theories: (1) Miller and Modigliani’s dividend irrelevance theory, (2) Gordon and Lintner’s bird-in-thehand theory, and (3) the tax preference theory. To understand the three theories, consider the case of Hardin Electronics, which has from its inception plowed all earnings back into the business and thus has never paid a dividend. Hardin’s management is now reconsidering its dividend policy, and it wants to adopt the policy that will maximize its stock price. Consider first the data presented below the graph. Each row shows an alternative payout policy: (1) Retain all earnings and pay out nothing, which is the present policy; (2) pay out 50 percent of earnings; and (3) pay out 100 percent of earnings. In the example, we assume that the company will have a 15 percent ROE regardless of which payout policy it follows, so with a book value per share of $30, EPS will be $4.50 under all payout policies.1 Given an EPS of $4.50, dividends per 0.15($30) share are shown in Column 3 under each payout policy. Under the assumption of a constant ROE, the growth rate shown in Column 4 will be g (% Retained)(ROE), and it will vary from 15 percent at a zero payout to zero at a 100 percent payout. For example, if Hardin pays out 50 percent of its earnings, then its dividend growth rate will be g 0.5(15%) 7.5%. Columns 5, 6, and 7 show how the situation would look if MM’s irrelevance theory were correct. Under this theory, neither the stock price nor the cost of equity would be affected by the payout policy—the stock price would remain constant at $30, and ks would be stable at 15 percent. Note that ks is found as the sum of the growth rate in Column 4 plus the dividend yield in Column 6. Columns 8, 9, and 10 show the situation if the bird-in-the-hand theory were true. Under this theory, investors prefer…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    dividend policy

    • 14319 Words
    • 93 Pages

    Information systems: You need to understand types of dividends, payment procedures, and the financial data that the firm…

    • 14319 Words
    • 93 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lang, L.; Stulz, R.; and W alkling, R. 1991. A test of the free cash flow…

    • 8667 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policies

    • 12438 Words
    • 50 Pages

    Appropriate dividend distribution Decision can not only set a good corporate image, but also to build the confidence of investors in the company's future prospects, thus creating a good corporate financing environment, the company’s long-term stable development.…

    • 12438 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays