The teleological argument shows that the earth could not just appear here, but had intelligence behind its composition. This belief argues that the earth had to be fine-tuned and developed by a divine mind. This argument supports the belief in God more than any other found. This is due to the growing amount of evidence supporting the argument. As scientist discover more about the universe, more and more is added to the list of scientific evidences supporting the teleological argument. The final argument is the moral argument. This argument states that if God does not exist, then morality and moral beliefs do not exist. Although, since we know that morals do exist, God must exist as well. To prove this argument wrong, you must believe that morals do not exist, or that God is not the standard for morality. Since most atheist do not want to state that morality does not exist, they must argue that God is not the standard for morality. To this day no one has been able to conceive a defensible grounding for moral
The teleological argument shows that the earth could not just appear here, but had intelligence behind its composition. This belief argues that the earth had to be fine-tuned and developed by a divine mind. This argument supports the belief in God more than any other found. This is due to the growing amount of evidence supporting the argument. As scientist discover more about the universe, more and more is added to the list of scientific evidences supporting the teleological argument. The final argument is the moral argument. This argument states that if God does not exist, then morality and moral beliefs do not exist. Although, since we know that morals do exist, God must exist as well. To prove this argument wrong, you must believe that morals do not exist, or that God is not the standard for morality. Since most atheist do not want to state that morality does not exist, they must argue that God is not the standard for morality. To this day no one has been able to conceive a defensible grounding for moral