Preview

Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence
1. So far, we have been discussing the manner in which Clifford argues that it is sometimes impermissible to believe something when one lacks adequate evidence. But remember: Clifford’s position is that it is never permissible to believe anything for which one lacks adequate evidence. How does Clifford extend the argument we’ve considered into one(s) whose conclusion(s) is/are that it is never permissible to believe anything for which one lacks adequate evidence? To what extent are his arguments for this conclusion successful? Explain.
Clifford argues that actions cannot be separated from belief, therefore any belief held without adequate evidence caries the potential for morally blameworthy consequences.
I don't believe this argument is successful, simply because it is possible to believe something with no evidence whatsoever, the consequences of which may or may not be blameworthy; such as believing that there exists somewhere in the world a living Tyrannosaurus Rex.
To use the example of the ship captain, believing the ship was seaworthy was in and of itself a morally blameworthy situation, whereas the belief in a tyrannosaurus rex is not in and of itself a morally blameworthy situation.
2. 1. Does anyone, in your opinion, have adequate evidence that God exists? That God does not exist? Why?
There is no adequate evidence that God exists, nor is there adequate evidence that God does not exist.
We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.
According to the cosmological argument, if every positive fact that has ever obtained has an explanation, then there must have existed at least one self-existent thing. It cannot be know whether such a being still exists, or if it satisfies any particular definition of God. If PSR is not always true, and there were no self-existent thing, existence would have no explanation, which in and of itself does not constitute evidence that God does not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If the question of right or wrong has to do with the origin of belief and whether or not one has the right to believe in the first place, then would the ship owner have been culpable had the doubts about the ship’s condition not been introduced? Is a person required to investigate EVERY doubt or question that is raised by another, which directly or indirectly impacts their belief? What if the source of doubt is unreliable? Without properly addressing these questions it is difficult to determine what the ship owner’s (or anyone else’s) responsibility was in the first place. This, I assert, is the fundamental problem with Clifford’s argument. To implicitly assume that one is guilty for simply believing without “sufficient” evidence can not be easily determined because the standards and thus the determination for “right” and “wrong” are too…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the first few paragraphs of his article, McCloskey does a little sleight of hand with his readers. He overstates the Theist’s case by referring to the proofs of God’s existence, and then feigns amazement at the fact that they actually don’t “prove” God’s existence. This sort of trick ought to be recognized by people familiar with philosophy of religion. The most common way Christian Apologists make the case for…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God on the basis that the universe has not always been in existence and so for it to be created, an external cause was necessary; this outside agent is viewed as God. It creates à posteriori knowledge which provides inductive explanations and makes conclusions on ideas based on actual experiences. It is a non-propositional argument so it cannot be proven but can be argued by offering experience as support.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does Clifford present a persuasive viewpoint of religious faith? In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to claim that it is inappropriate always, in all places, and for anyone, to believe anything upon unsatisfactory evidence. The goal of this paper is to determine whether indeed this opinion offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is persuasive. To successfully do this, I will weigh up the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that of disbelieving anything based upon scarce evidence, it always does damage and therefore is wrong. Such an assertion is in direct conflict to those pious believers who consider their blind faith as a goodness and for whom proof is something that is needless…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, I hope to effectively summarize W.K Clifford’s (1879) argument on the ethics of belief, followed by a summary of William James’ (1897) argument on the right to believe, and finally, provide an argument for why W.K Clifford’s (1879) argument is stronger by highlighting its strengths while simultaneously arguing against William James’ (1897) argument.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Ethics of Belief” written by W.K. Clifford. Explains the idea of belief and moral righteousness by coming up with the conclusion that it is morally incorrect to believe in a claim with insufficient evidence or to create a claim without sufficient evidence. Clifford brings about various analogies that prove his claim to be true such as the ship-owner and the religious group on the island. Although these ideas helped set out the theory efficiently, William James essay “The Will to Believe” believes in the opposite by stating that anyone can believe in anything without the sufficient evidence provided for a specific claim. James’s, the essay provides counterexamples to Clifford’s work as well as provides strong examples and positions to help…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 1 Philosophy

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the most compelling argument for the existence for god would come from the teleological agreement. The teleological argument states that because the universe and the…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cosmological argument for the existence of God. .... The first thing to note about the cosmological argument is that it is A Posteriori. ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In The Ethics of Belief by W.K Clifford this philosopher states that it is wrong in every situation ever to believe anything based on insufficient evidence, as it is wrong for someone to simply believe something to be true based solely on the sincerity of their convictions or by stifling their doubts. He states that if the origin of the belief is not founded on proven fact then the believer is guilty of an untrue/false belief as a result of not taking the time or having the patience to investigate the validity of the belief and, even if their belief is sincere, they have “no right to believe on such evidence as was before them” . I agree with Clifford’s’ evidentialist view to a point, as in theory it is a good one, however, practically I believe it is not a realistic way to live your life, as it would be near impossible to find time to investigate and sufficient evidence on which to base every single belief that you come across in your life.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some may argue that Gods existence cannot be proven this is simply not true, God’s existence can be proven it is important to prove this so our souls don’t go to hell but go to heaven and live there for an eternity. We as human’s find it necessary to have something to believe in whether it is God, Allah, Jehovah or Christ. The problem is not believing in something, but how being able to prove what we believe in. For example let’s look at some of the arguments of the proof of God’s existence and why it is important to prove.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steps to Christ

    • 2416 Words
    • 10 Pages

    God never asks us to believe, without giving sufficient evidence upon which to base our faith. His existence, His character, the truthfulness of His word, are all established by testimony that appeals to our reason; and this testimony is abundant. Yet God has never removed the possibility of doubt. Our faith must rest upon evidence, not demonstration. Those who wish to doubt will have opportunity; while those who really desire to know the truth will find plenty of evidence on which to rest their faith.…

    • 2416 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The cosmological argument for God’s existence differs from both the scriptural and ontological arguments in the way in which humans created it. Rather than looking at logical arguments or religious texts, the cosmological argument was derived because of humanity’s ability to project their need for cause onto the world. The cosmological argument is centered on the way in which we, humans in general, perceive there to be a need for a God due to the existence of the world around us.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    is god real

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Here are the most popular arguments for the existence of God, along with our critique. You may also notice that many of these arguments are, in themselves, classic examples of logical fallacies.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While majority of atheists believe that the existence of heaven and hell is not provable, basing their arguments on ignorance, I believe that God exists due to my faith, religion and scientific knowledge; and because He does exist, so does Hell and Heaven. Heaven is the home of the righteous whereas Hell is its opposite according to religious teachings; most arguments supporting the evidence of Hell and Heaven are based on religious beliefs. In accordance with Irvine, 1985 atheism is the main reason why a person might doubt the existence of Heaven and Hell. However, there have been scientific claims that hold up the existence of Hell and Heaven. Proving the existence of has become an obsession with most people since time immemorial. Many have worked tirelessly to provide evidence backing up God’s existence. To support why I believe God exists, I present eleven causes that can support my claim:…

    • 792 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays