Preview

The Conspirators Justified In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Conspirators Justified In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar
“Let’s kill him boldly, not wrathfully” (Ⅱ.Ⅰ.171-172). In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the conspirators (Brutus, Cassius, Casca…) feel Julius Caesar isn't the best ruler for Rome. They have a very horrid plan to get rid of him for good. The real question is were the conspirators justified or not? In Williams play, the conspirators are definitely justified in killing Caesar because of his ambitious power and physical weakness. He was not fit to be the ruler of Rome.

During act one and act two Brutus and Cassius have a tragic plan to kill Caesar because they think he has too much power. Caesar is being praised for his battle that he just won and the whole town is cheering for him,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It portrays the 44 BC conspiracy against the Roman dictator Julius Caesar, his assassination and the defeat of the conspirators. Although the title of the play is Julius Caesar, Caesar is not the central character in its action; he appears in only three scenes, and is killed at the beginning of the third act. The protagonist of the play is Marcus Brutus, and the central psychological drama is his struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism, and friendship.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar happened on March 15th of 44 B.C. It was a conspiracy by many Roman senators and was led by Marcus Brutus, Caesar's best friend, and Gaius Longinus. At this time, Caesar was the leader of the Roman Republic and had been declared the dictator perpetou. Several senators feared that Caesar wanted to overthrow the senate for tyranny. As Caesar entered the theatre ofPompey, he was intercepted by several senators who led him to a room next to the east portico. Once the meeting started, Caesar was approached by Tillius Cimber to present a petition on behalf of his exiled brother. Cimber grabbed and pulled Caesar's toga off his shoulder. This was the signal to start the attack. Caesar was attacked by over 60 members…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus believes he must kill Caesar to avoid a one- man rule and for the good of the country. His tragic flaw allows him to be fooled into this by the other conspirators. Brutus believes his motives are honorable. If Caesar was really being killed for the good of Rome and not because the other conspirators were jealous of his power, Brutus motives would be…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar in the play "The tragedy of Julius Caesar" was a in line to be the next ruler of Ancient Rome. Caesar becomes drunk in power as most people would when there are roughly a million people adoring you. The people of Ancient Rome truly liked Caesar, in fact in Act 1 Scene 1, a commoner says "..we are taking holiday for Caesar's arrival.." In this act the reader gets a sense on how much the people like Caesar. However it is also shown to the reader how much noblemen do not like or trust Caesar to be a good leader. Throughout Act 1 and 2 Cassius is trying to convince Brutus, one of Caesar's good friends, to help them murder Caesar so he could take the crown. Brutus and his followers believe they are doing a service to the people. That in some way sacrificing Caesar is for the better good. However this being said Caesar's death was not a sacrifice it was a butchery, there is no need to go out and kill someone.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Conspirator

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The four conspirators who were in charge of the assassination of Julius Caesar had many reasons for their attack and desire to kill the emperor of the Roman Republic. The four men that came up with the plan to assassinate Julius Caesar were not enemies of him, and had different beliefs on why they should kill him. The first two conspirators, Gaius Trebonius and Junius Brutus Albinus, both having a friendly relationship with Julius Caesar, had both served and fought with Caesar, but both men believed they had not been given the credit the deserved for the work they had done for him (Wasson). The other two conspirators, Gaius Cassius Linginus and Marcus Junius Brutus did not have the same relationship with Caesar as the first two did. Both of these men had fought and served for Pompey (Wasson). According to Michael Parenti, an American political scientist and historian, there were several reasons behind the desire to assassinate Julius Caesar.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragic Hero Archetype

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What the citizens of Rome saw was only the persona he cultivated to appear humble. But Brutus says of Caesar, “I have not known when his [Caesar’s] affections swayed/ More than his reason,” (II, i, l 19 - 21). Although Brutus is afraid of what Caesar may become if he were to gain more power, he knows that Caesar is not abusing it as of that point. His arrogance is plain to see, but Caesar still makes reasonable decisions based on what is best for the people of Rome and not himself and doesn’t hold any biases. This would suggest that Caesar does in fact follow a moral code and strives to actually be a good person, which is a characteristic of the Shakespearean tragic hero. Cassius and the other senators created the conspiracy mainly because of envy of him acting like he is not human like them because of his power and ambition instead of fear of what the citizens of Rome might suffer if he were to gain more…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Honorable or not? Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare was a tragedy consisting many events. The tragedy of Julius Caesar began in Rome when the people of Rome are taking a holiday to celebrate the triumphant return of Julius Caesar. Two tribunes’ names Marullis and Flavious try to shame the people of Rome for their fickle behavior for one minute praising Pompey and now praising Caesar. Julius Caesar is a highly successful leader of Rome whose popularity seems to model a dictatorship. Although Caesar is loved and supported by the citizens some begin to grow worry of his increase in power through out Rome. Soon these worried citizens conspire to assassinate Caesar before he becomes king thus returning their republic government into a monarchy. These worried citizens consisted of two main characters Brutus and Cassius. Brutus ends up joining this conspiracy in killing Caesar because he strongly believes in keeping Rome a government ruled by the people. In addition to that, during the celebration, of Caesar is warned by the Soothsayer to “beware the Ides of March” The next…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the conspirators killing Caesar are unjustifiable is the killing of Pompey’s sons, Caesar denying the crown three times and illogical explanations that were given. With this is mind, Caesar has defeated the sons of his archival, Pompey, in battle. Hence,…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The conspiracy of Julius Caesars death was based off of emotions and logic. Because Brutus , He was willing to kill his friend because he wanted to be the emperor of Rome. Also persuaded people to believe that just so he could take the thrown which was based off emotions because he wanted the thrown for his own good.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Cassius, a main character, discussed the integral role of humanity's decisions, saying, "The fault...is not in our stars, but in ourselves" (I.ii.139-141). Within a modern context, Cassius's viewpoint is secular, demanding that all of us, not fate, is in control of the courses of our lives. However, it is also countercultural as our society ingrains itself in the norm of scapegoating, where humanity points to individuals/groups whom we can dump our rage for our societal plagues. Scapegoating is a topical issue today as we blame Islam for terrorism and sexism, Hispanics/African Americans for rape, drugs, and shootings, and etc. As we continue excluding different groups, our society confirms stereotypes…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays