Preview

Julius Caesar Scapegoating Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
978 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Scapegoating Analysis
In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Cassius, a main character, discussed the integral role of humanity's decisions, saying, "The fault...is not in our stars, but in ourselves" (I.ii.139-141). Within a modern context, Cassius's viewpoint is secular, demanding that all of us, not fate, is in control of the courses of our lives. However, it is also countercultural as our society ingrains itself in the norm of scapegoating, where humanity points to individuals/groups whom we can dump our rage for our societal plagues. Scapegoating is a topical issue today as we blame Islam for terrorism and sexism, Hispanics/African Americans for rape, drugs, and shootings, and etc. As we continue excluding different groups, our society confirms stereotypes …show more content…
Another major reason for scapegoating is taking comfort in our personal beliefs, not contributing to issues like violence on a larger scale. Placing the blame on others gives us an escape from the gaping holes in our respective sets of morals, in turn solidifying our beliefs. One example is from Douglas Coupland's Hey Nostradamus, where Jason, a teenager, became scapegoated by the media and his church for having a role in a school shooting. However, this was a relief to the parents of his late "wife" Cheryl, who both took comfort in knowing how Jason "'seemed like the kind of guy who'd plan...assist in murdering a whole school" (Coupland 88). Jason's scapegoat was a coping mechanism for Cheryl's parents after noticing that Jason's way of life carried over to their daughter dying. As they were more adamant about their beliefs, they didn't see the need to reconcile with Jason. Similarly, in Beyond the Divide, the movie details the dissension between pacifists and Vietnam veterans in Missoula, Montana. After Vietnam, peace advocates protested against Vietnam vets for being murderers, their hands covered in cold blood. Once they added more insult to injury with the Missoula peace sign, veterans were angry over their country, not welcoming them with the respect that they should have received. As both sides became angrier over their conditions, the more effort it took for each side to listen to each other. Therefore, we can be open by learning that we don't have all the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thus, by concentrating on the main levers of government in his hands, Caesar was able to control all the main spheres of life of the Roman society. He expanded the social composition of the ruling elites, integrating almost all the available layers of Roman society into it, and he solved a number of vitally important social issues that helped him to restore peace in the…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act 5 begins with Octavius and Antony saying that their hopes have come true because the men are fleeing the hills and coming to them. This says that Brutus is not truly in his right mind for strategy and is blinded by wanting be honorable after killing Caesar. Cassius then tells Brutus “Flatterers! Now, Brutus, thank yourself;/This tongue had not offended so today/If Cassius might have ruled.” (see lines 45-47), meaning that if had acted as Cassius suggested, then they would not be headed towards battle and may have lived. Also, Cassius reveals that he has seen ravens, crows, and kites flying over them, like vultures waiting for meat after the prey has been killed. After Cassius confession, Brutus says that should they lose the battle, he…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are to produce a contribution to an online HSC Tutorial. You are to record and upload an answer to the question below. It is to be no longer than seven minutes and no less than five minutes.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar happened on March 15th of 44 B.C. It was a conspiracy by many Roman senators and was led by Marcus Brutus, Caesar's best friend, and Gaius Longinus. At this time, Caesar was the leader of the Roman Republic and had been declared the dictator perpetou. Several senators feared that Caesar wanted to overthrow the senate for tyranny. As Caesar entered the theatre ofPompey, he was intercepted by several senators who led him to a room next to the east portico. Once the meeting started, Caesar was approached by Tillius Cimber to present a petition on behalf of his exiled brother. Cimber grabbed and pulled Caesar's toga off his shoulder. This was the signal to start the attack. Caesar was attacked by over 60 members…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Conspirator

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The four conspirators who were in charge of the assassination of Julius Caesar had many reasons for their attack and desire to kill the emperor of the Roman Republic. The four men that came up with the plan to assassinate Julius Caesar were not enemies of him, and had different beliefs on why they should kill him. The first two conspirators, Gaius Trebonius and Junius Brutus Albinus, both having a friendly relationship with Julius Caesar, had both served and fought with Caesar, but both men believed they had not been given the credit the deserved for the work they had done for him (Wasson). The other two conspirators, Gaius Cassius Linginus and Marcus Junius Brutus did not have the same relationship with Caesar as the first two did. Both of these men had fought and served for Pompey (Wasson). According to Michael Parenti, an American political scientist and historian, there were several reasons behind the desire to assassinate Julius Caesar.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andersonville Prison

    • 4639 Words
    • 19 Pages

    When one turns on the television today they are made witness to all the crimes that are present in society. It is impossible to sit through thirty-five minutes of news without anger and rage becoming aroused. This is because society is bothered by infinitesimal paraphernalia. Society also believes in human rights and punishment for those who violate such rights. Yet what constitutes humanity? Ever sit there and watch the news and wonder just how far humanity reaches? When is it time to say this is a human rights violation? Every wonder when someone 's morals and ethics begin to effect their ability to do their job? Ever wonder why in every news story the "bad guy" always become caught? Ever wonder how many people on death row might not be guilt? Some of them could have even been used as scapegoats. Yet how does one become a scapegoat? Could someone out there have that much hatred and anger to blame one person for the faults of many? Is the need for blame significant? Does desire lead to more hatred and evil? What does it feel like to be blamed for something that might not be wrong, and to be put on trial knowing that the jury wants to blame someone? In society and in the United States since its founding, there has been a need to place blame. Imagine how the person being blamed would feel. Henry Wirz did not have to image it; he lived through it and died for it. Someone is always to be blamed, even if they were just following orders. Orders which can only go so far until humanity takes effect. Henry Wirz was used as a scapegoat for war crimes committed during the Civil War at Andersonville Prison, however that does not justify his acts or make him an American hero.…

    • 4639 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corruption or the abuse of power is evident in the story of Julius Caesar, as it’s often mentioned by the characters, and is the center of the tragedy. Cassius, throughout…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The conspiracy of Julius Caesars death was based off of emotions and logic. Because Brutus , He was willing to kill his friend because he wanted to be the emperor of Rome. Also persuaded people to believe that just so he could take the thrown which was based off emotions because he wanted the thrown for his own good.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutophobia In Society

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    people try to find some sort of excuse for the actions of the "bad people".…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays