Preview

The Chernobyl

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1915 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Chernobyl
M19_SLAC0460_06_SE_C19.QXD

10/20/09

9:55

Page 597

Chapter 19

Risk management



Failure over time is often represented as a failure curve. The most common form of this is the so-called ‘bath-tub curve’ which shows the chances of failure being greater at the beginning and end of the life of a system or part of a system.



Failure analysis mechanisms include accident investigation, product liability, complaint analysis, critical incident analysis, and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA).

➤ How can failures be prevented?


There are four major methods of improving reliability: designing out the fail points in the operation, building redundancy into the operation, ‘fail-safeing’ some of the activities of the operation, and maintenance of the physical facilities in the operation.



Maintenance is the most common way operations attempt to improve their reliability, with three broad approaches. The first is running all facilities until they break down and then repairing them, the second is regularly maintaining the facilities even if they have not broken down, and the third is to monitor facilities closely to try to predict when breakdown might occur.



Two specific approaches to maintenance have been particularly influential: total productive maintenance (TPM) and reliability-centred maintenance (RCM).

➤ How can operations mitigate the effects of failure?


Risk, or failure, mitigation means isolating a failure from its negative consequences.



Risk mitigation actions include:
– Mitigation planning.
– Economic mitigation.
– Containment (spatial and temporal).
– Loss reduction.
– Substitution.

➤ How can operations recover from the effects of failure?


Recovery can be enhanced by a systematic approach to discovering what has happened to cause failure, acting to inform, contain and follow up the consequences of failure, learning to find the root cause of the failure and preventing it taking

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first disparity between the Chernobyl and Fukushima accident is the causes. The Chernobyl accident was caused by human error in conducting the plant outside its technical specifications and failure to notify the proper authorities following the accident. Chernobyl’s power plant also had a faulty nuclear reactor design which exclude a containment structure typically found in most nuclear power plant. The two contributing factors usher the nuclear reactor to explode and failure to contain discharge of radioactive materials into the atmosphere. In contrast, the Fukushima accident precipitate due to natural disaster consist of earthquake and tsunami causing a malfunction of the plant’s cooling system. Unlike Chernobyl, Fukushima’s nuclear plant…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Est1 Task 5

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Task one: A description of how a food safety management procedure ensures effective compliance with current legislation and codes of practice at the University of East Anglia catering Department.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BP Presentation

    • 282 Words
    • 4 Pages

     Manage environmental conditions and impacts at higher levels.  Create a Safety First culture across the company, vendors, and customers. …

    • 282 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it important for you to know what happened at Three Mile Island and at Chernobyl even though you may have little interest in science or engineering? Why and why not?…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Root Cause Analysis

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    therapist, and ED Nurse Manager. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the root…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Make sure that they and their employees understand and follow Health and Safety System (Support Plans). Also involve people who use the service where possible.…

    • 4689 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Identify and implement preventative controls and measures to increase availability, decrease the disruption effects, and reduce the cost of contingency.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Ensure equipment and materials are stored in a safe manner when not in use…

    • 2383 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chernobyl

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Chernobyl disaster is considered to be the most nuclear accident in the world. It occurred on the 26th of April 1986 at 1:23 am in Ukraine at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The fourth reactor in the plant exploded causing further explosions in the plant and a fire, which sent highly radioactive plumes into the air. The accident occurred during a test that was being performed, to experiment a safety core cooling system, which used cold water to cool the reactors in case of a power failure. The accident was caused by a combination of inexperienced workers and an unclear procedure. The event was an made and detrimental to the people and the environment surrounding the power plant.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiet Chernobyl

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The drying of the Aral Sea is widely regarded as one of the worst human induced environmental disasters in history. However due to the slow moving nature of the disaster it is often the people of the Aral Sea and the issues they face who are the forgotten. Unlike earthquakes, fires, and tsunamis there is no immediate death toll or number of people left homeless. Nonetheless the drying of the Aral Sea has had a catastrophic affect on the people that relied on it for their water, jobs, food, and health. This is perhaps why it is referred to by some as a ‘Quiet Chernobyl’1. This essay will detail how people’s lives have changed since 1960 around the Aral Sea and analyse the reasons why they have failed to show any real resilience against the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plant suffered major damage from the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that hit Japan on March 11, 2011 and, as of December 2012, is not expected to reopen. The earthquake and tsunami disabled the reactor cooling systems, leading to releases of radioactivity and triggering a 30 km evacuation zone surrounding the plant. On April 20, 2011, the Japanese authorities declared the 20 km evacuation zone a no-go area which may only be entered under government supervision.…

    • 5782 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facilities – we check the facilities every day for any hazards or dangers such as wet floors/hall way and any hazards that could cause accidents such as tripping over objects or slipping on wet floors. We must make sure all exits are clear and accessible in case of a fire alarm or emergencies. We check the indoor/outdoor environment to make sure all floors and apparatus are dry and no loose parts that may cause injury, including checking doors, windows, main entrance/exits and cctv is working for extra security of young people and staff.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checking for possible cave-ins Checking for hazardous atmospheres Checking for hazardous conditions All of the above…

    • 3949 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a leader failure can be used as a tool for empowerment and better decision making based on past failed experiences as well as how to better equip yourself for new situatons that may arise. Failure tends to reveal opportunities for second chances. It allows you to see opportunities at a broader observation and assist with…

    • 2230 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

    • 42906 Words
    • 172 Pages

    A First-Hand Account of Japan's Nuclear Crisis Katsumi Furitsu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Young doctors speak out on the Fukushima disaster . . . . . . . . . . .40 Japan’s Nuclear Nightmare Ronald McCoy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 “A terribly difficult situation with a lot of uncertainties”: PSR Press Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46 What may we learn from Fukushima? Frank Boulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57 Radiation in medicine and in nuclear power plants: the same but very different Andreas Nidecker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61 Children, Teens and the Japan Disaster Harry Wang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63…

    • 42906 Words
    • 172 Pages
    Powerful Essays