Teleological Framework
Unit V Case Study
Luther Taylor
Columbia Southern University
November 06, 2017
Teleological Framework
Advocates for moving the textile manufacturing plant from North Carolina to Southeast Asia would incorporate the teleological framework, because the company’s actions are morally neutral when studied apart from their consequences. Teleological framework can be described as oriented ethics, where the end outcomes will always justify the means.
Supporters of the move from the North Carolina Plant to the South East Asia plant, has a narrative that the end results of the relocation is that the company will be saved as a whole and able to grow. This move will allow the textile company to take advantage of the free market while also benefitting from less expensive methods of producing product and buying material. As a consequence the company will …show more content…
This decision is not being made lightly it is a necessity for the company to stay afloat and hopefully be able start again and be more prosperous in the future. By making this brass decision to lay off employees and shut down the North Carolina plant it validates the teleological framework, and it expresses that it is not about being fair or being moral. It is about doing whatever is necessary to produce the results needed to keep the company viable.
Deontological Ethics
If we were to look at things in the mindset of the opponents of the North Carolina Plant moving to the South East Asia plant, they would say this type of decision is unethical. Deontological ethics represents the morality of human actions or decision-making. Deontological ethics is based on each person’s responsibility towards each individual person, environment, and all living things. Adversaries of the move would relate to deontological ethics, because the plant
Luther Taylor
Columbia Southern University
November 06, 2017
Teleological Framework
Advocates for moving the textile manufacturing plant from North Carolina to Southeast Asia would incorporate the teleological framework, because the company’s actions are morally neutral when studied apart from their consequences. Teleological framework can be described as oriented ethics, where the end outcomes will always justify the means.
Supporters of the move from the North Carolina Plant to the South East Asia plant, has a narrative that the end results of the relocation is that the company will be saved as a whole and able to grow. This move will allow the textile company to take advantage of the free market while also benefitting from less expensive methods of producing product and buying material. As a consequence the company will …show more content…
This decision is not being made lightly it is a necessity for the company to stay afloat and hopefully be able start again and be more prosperous in the future. By making this brass decision to lay off employees and shut down the North Carolina plant it validates the teleological framework, and it expresses that it is not about being fair or being moral. It is about doing whatever is necessary to produce the results needed to keep the company viable.
Deontological Ethics
If we were to look at things in the mindset of the opponents of the North Carolina Plant moving to the South East Asia plant, they would say this type of decision is unethical. Deontological ethics represents the morality of human actions or decision-making. Deontological ethics is based on each person’s responsibility towards each individual person, environment, and all living things. Adversaries of the move would relate to deontological ethics, because the plant