Preview

Summary International Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary International Law
Summary International Law
Week 1:
International law: Rules and principles that govern the international relations between sovereign states and other institutional subjects of international law.
* Created primarily by states.
* The fact that rules come into being in the manner accepted and recognized by states as authoritative, is enough to ensure that ‘law’ exists.
* When a country breaches international law, the Security Council may take enforcement action, or it can result in the loss of corresponding legal rights and privileges.
* However, international law lacks many of the formal institutions present in national legal systems.
* The International Court of Justice is the judicial organ of the UN and the ICC deals with serious violations of international law of individuals. There are also a few ad hoc tribunals that are concerned with discrete issues of international law.
* Another disadvantage is that the system of flexible and open-ended rules is a lack of certainty.
Effectiveness:
- International law is needed in order to ensure a stable and orderly international society.
- There is a psychological barrier against breaking international law, simply because it is law.
- The practitioners of international law may have a ‘habit of obedience’ derived from their own training as national lawyers which serves to encourage respect for international law.
Weaknesses:
- Lack of formal institutions present in national legal systems.
- Customary law-making process may be too slow when new rules are needed quickly.
- The system of flexible and open-ended rules is a lack of certainty.
- International law often seems powerless to prevent major ruptures of the fabric of international society.

Juridical basis of international law:
* International law is based on the consensual theory. No international law can be created without the consent of the state which is to be bound.
* However, there is also the theory that rules of law are derived from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the main judicial organ of the United Nations. It replaced by the Permanent Court of International Justice after World War II, when it was made part of the UN Charter drafted in San Francisco in 1945, International Court of Justice .…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus 378 Week 3

    • 3675 Words
    • 10 Pages

    International law is developed and agreed upon by those that make up the international system, but not every nation state is a member or has a part in the process. Most nations are said to comply with International Law, but that appears questionable considering the number of human rights violations still occurring around the world. While the international community does attempt to hold all nations to International Law, it is not always feasible. Force may be necessary in order to ensure compliance, and the international community is generally against the use of force…

    • 3675 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World order is the concept of peace and regulation within all nation states of the world. The most important component of world order is a world full of peace, greater equality and freedom from suffering. However the initiative of world order is evidently an ideal. For this reason, along with the changing nature of the law and the international community, lawmakers constantly reform international law to ensure that it is effective in achieving world order.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Midterm Review

    • 2002 Words
    • 15 Pages

    This theory is based on the premise that law derives its status as law from the fact that it has been enacted by the sovereign with the power to enforce his or her wishes.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    this essay I will attempt to examine and analyse the effectiveness of international courts and…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Universal jurisdiction

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jurisdiction is one the legal terms that must be used with extreme caution. Most generally jurisdiction is understood as the power of the State to regulate affairs pursuant to its laws.1 Controversial issues may arise when offence assumes international aspect which can cause conflict between jurisdictions of the countries. In each of the preceding bases of jurisdiction there must be a material link between the state asserting jurisdiction and the crime. That is what distinguishes the Universality Principle from the other bases; there need not be any specific link between the crime, its perpetrator or victims, and the state undertaking to exercise jurisdiction2. It might be said, that this principle developed in regard with State’s aim not only protect its own interests, but international community’s interests as whole, as international crimes may affect all the international legal order. More specifically, international crimes, such as crimes against peace, war crimes or crimes against humanity and transnational crimes – money laundering, terrorism, piracy, etc. are global and causes threat to international community as whole. However, universality principle has generated a great deal of controversy, in equal parts exegetical and political. 3 The aim of this essay is to identify and analyze some of the legal challenges of prosecuting international crimes under the basis of universal jurisdiction.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central argument of the "Feminist Approaches to International Law" (Charlesworth, Chinkin and Wright, 1991) is diffuse. On the one hand, the case for and solution to the feministic deficit in international law is presented. Secondly, they argue that feminist approaches are universal or more understanding than elitist male perspectives; however, the lack of substantiating information means they do not fully demonstrate the weaknesses of the current system. In fact, they show the seriousness in which the role of women is taken, but that there is a need for greater speed in the changes to international law.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The impact of state sovereignty on domestic and international law has significantly shifted the rights of all nations. Due to state sovereignty, many breaches of international law take place, especially in the areas of human rights, such as how Australia is not fulfilling its obligations, e.g. “Time for rethink on asylum seeker treatment” (SMH, 11/04/2013) Australian government has not practiced the requirements needed to maintain the fundamental human rights treaty for asylum seekers, within the Australian domestic law.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However the ICC has limited effectiveness due to its limited ability to enforce international law. One aspect that hinders the effectiveness is the fact that the ICC and other international tribunals have no police force and are reliant on states to arrest indicted victims and bring them before…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, the ICC is not designed to be preventive, for the victims of these terrible crimes but it is crucial that these offenders are apprehended, tried and punished. Retribution and protection of society are objectives not only for the domestic criminal justice system but also for the new international version. The ICC is essential to international law and enforcing it.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    War Crimes

    • 2838 Words
    • 12 Pages

    “No crime without law”, is a statement that was agreed upon for every power- wielding country across the globe1. Any discretion would normally result in the United Nations International Court of Justice to bring down the iron fist and resolve the situation in any way that they feel fit. Recently, there has been another method to solve disagreements throughout the world, not with petty crimes, but war crimes. War crimes are offenses that undermine the previously amended laws and were believed to be served and handled by the offending country2. Due to the polemical ideas of participating countries, war crimes have been debated with whether or not these crimes should be resolved by an international court. While 120 countries have signed and gave the ICC- International Criminal Court- control over war crimes within their countries with the belief that the crimes will not go unpunished, several other nations have repeatedly denied the ICC access to govern their crimes due to the risk of losing sovereignty.…

    • 2838 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem with the International Court of Justice being the law between states is that it stands on flimsy ground being that international law is based mostly on tradition and customs and is generally considered non-binding on states without its conformity to the states national laws. The fact that jurisdiction is voluntary with the ICJ presents several problems that for many countries, doubt the effectiveness of such international court. One very glaring example is the Nicaragua case which the Court called on the US to ‘cease and refrain ' from using ‘unlawful use of force ' against the Nicaraguan government and to pay war reparations for the interference on the country 's political history. The United States in 1984 withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction from the ICJ after that decision. If the United States can easily broke off a supposedly binding agreement to faithfully comply with the decisions of the Court, what precedent could it then give to other states wishing to try legal disputes? Following the law of stare decisis, other states can just easily withdraw from compulsory jurisdiction when the Court rules against them.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the dissolution of the Soviet Union occurred towards the last years of the twentieth century, the world’s nations experienced an era of cooperation and unprecedented unity, leading to the creation of international organizations known as the International Criminal Court (ICC). Its purpose would be to capture criminals who had committed crimes against humanity and try them when their home nations refused to do so. Although there have been such courts in the past, the ICC would be the first of its kind to be a permanent international court. However, as all international organizations are, the courts are laden with internal disputes and disorganization from the sheer amount of people and their respective ideas present. Therefore, since the creation of the ICC, there has been a heated debate over its purpose: some argue that the ICC is integral in maintaining international relations and the protection of human rights, while others argue that the ICC is relatively incompetent in carrying out its goal, thereby wasting international resources. Although supporters may claim that the International Criminal Court has properly captured and convicted international criminals to their proper sentences, they fail to see that the court has almost no power compared to other international organizations, is too bloated with internal political disputes to work efficiently, and is a waste of international funds.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The International Court of Justice being a legal body of the United Nations, processes disputes of member states if requested by them and gives advice on legal matters to international organizations. Out of all the cases processed by the International Court of Justice only a few have been decisive. Given the ratio of the decisions reached by this court, the question arises that is it successful…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    International criminal law is a body of international law designed to prohibit certain categories of conduct commonly viewed as serious atrocities and to make perpetrators of such conduct criminally accountable for their perpetration. Principally, it deals with genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity as well as the War of aggression. This article also discusses crimes against international law, which may not be part of the body of international criminal law…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics