Preview

Midterm Review

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Midterm Review
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeal has appellate jurisdiction over the U.S. Claims Court.

True

Which of the following terms best describes the decision reached by an arbitrator? Award
The dispute resolution method that is most likely to be used by a regulatory agency to negotiate the provisions of the regulations with the interested groups so that there is less likelihood of a challenge once the regulations are promulgated is: regulatory negotiation

With reference to the federal government, which of the following is definitely true regarding a system of checks and balances?

Only one of the branches is given all the authority.

All the branches of the government are given equal authority.

All the branches of the government operate independent of each other.

It ensures that government policies are not reached without the input of the other branches.

Which of the following tasks is performed by the legislative branch of the government?

Interpret laws.

Pass laws to bring the court's interpretation of law in line with the views of the legislature.

Request legislation and veto legislation.

Interpret executive orders or other presidential acts as unconstitutional.

Which of the following statements is true regarding the sociological theory?

This theory is based on a premise that there is a discoverable set of absolute right and wrong principles upon which our laws should be based.

According to this theory, law should change as societal ideas change.

According to this theory, to the extent laws reflect laws of nature, or God, the laws are considered "good" ones. To the extent they do not, they are "bad."

This theory is based on the premise that law derives its status as law from the fact that it has been enacted by the sovereign with the power to enforce his or her wishes.

Identify the correct statement regarding an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) program attached to the court.

It increases court docket congestion.

It lightens the court's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The system of checks and balances is an important part of the United States Constitution. The three branches of the government representing the separation of powers – executive, legislative, and judicial – each hold specific responsibilities. Checks and balances is a method set in place so that no branch of the government can become to powerful by allowing each branch to limit the powers of the others. This is accomplished by each branch checking the powers of the other branches to ensure the balance between all three. “The rationale of the separation of powers is often elided with the rationale of checks and balances and with the rationale of the dispersal of power generally in a constitutional system” (Waldron).…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The benefit of ADR, allows a legal issue to be resolved without having to spend as much money and time as a traditional means. Arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation are a few of the alternative means to resolve disputes. For the majority of the ADR process, there is no need for a judge or jury. Initially, an ADR method should be chosen, with a neutral individual in charge of facilitation. For the benefit of avoiding a public trial, a…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Federalist Papers No. 51 ,written by James Madison, are trying to explain the “the Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments.” No. 51 also explains how…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Do three branches act in a constructive way to promote the will of the people, or is it more like a stalemate?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They came up with an idea called checks and balances. James Madison wrote, “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” Checks and balances were created to make sure each branch could check the others and have some involvement in the decisions of the other branches (Doc C). Some examples of the control they have are that, the President can nominate the judges, but the court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. Congress can impeach the President, but the President can veto Congressional legislation (Doc C). This was a success in stopping the dominance of one branch over another, and checks and balances allowed each branch to have a say in final…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    frgdgrgrs

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central and state governments will check each other’s power. Also, the branches within each level of government will provide checks and balances.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Checks and Balances within the U.S Government. (n.d.). Retrieved from free online research papers: www.freeonlineresearchpapers.com…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guard Against Tyranny

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Legislative, executive, and judicial are the three branches. The legislative branch, which consists of a senate and house of representatives, makes laws. The president and vice-president make up the executive branch, which is the branch mainly responsible for enforcing laws. Finally, there is the judicial branch. In the judicial branch, there is the Supreme Court and many smaller courts. The judicial branch is responsible for interpretting laws; this is all according to Document B, also written by James Madison. In a nutshell, seperation of powers guards against tyranny because it divides the powers into three branches so no branch can overpower…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    had an oversight role over the other two branches. This system of checks and balances has been…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Still Works

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Laws work when we keep them and none of them breaker, when a group of people decides to break the law, law and discipline of the law is lost, and the law is no longer frightens people and everyone does what they want.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We the People

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One provision of the Constitution that provides a means of preventing the abuse or misuse of governmental power is checks and balances. Checks and balances give a limit on each branch and its powers by dividing the legislative branch into a bicameral legislature which consists of a Senate and a House of Representatives, the executive branch which the president appoints justices of the Supreme…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The theory of natural law originates from Aristotle’s idea of goodness as fitness for purpose and stoic’s concept of a universal law of reason which is in agreement with nature. What we now call human nature. This point is then furthered by Aquinas who agrees with the argument but furthers it by linking it with his Christian belief by saying following this law is equivalent to following the command of God as human nature is in us inbuilt into us from when God created us.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document C, it says, “… the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…. (The Three Branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This basically means other branch checks on each other to make sure they have all the same amount of power. They check by using their equal power and approving or disapproving something that the other branch has done, for example, the Executive Branch can veto a congressional legislation, however, Legislative Branch can override the presidential veto. If one branch becomes overpowered, then it may consider tyranny, in which, one branch has absolute control over the whole government. All in all, using checks and balances the Constitution may help stop tyranny in the United…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays