Preview

The Viability of the International Court of Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Viability of the International Court of Justice
The Viability of the International Court of Justice

The International Court of Justice is the main judicial branch of the United Nations. This organ is open to all members of the United Nations and its establishment has been dictated by the UN Charter since its inception in 1945 in San Francisco. The ICJ for all intents and purposes is an ideal that has come into being, a precursor of a branch of a future world government. Governments who wish to settle legal disputes may submit jurisdiction to the ICJ for settlement. The court also performs arbitration and mediation functions between states but it cannot impose compulsory jurisdiction without the states express consent. The problem with the International Court of Justice being the law between states is that it stands on flimsy ground being that international law is based mostly on tradition and customs and is generally considered non-binding on states without its conformity to the states national laws. The fact that jurisdiction is voluntary with the ICJ presents several problems that for many countries, doubt the effectiveness of such international court. One very glaring example is the Nicaragua case which the Court called on the US to ‘cease and refrain ' from using ‘unlawful use of force ' against the Nicaraguan government and to pay war reparations for the interference on the country 's political history. The United States in 1984 withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction from the ICJ after that decision. If the United States can easily broke off a supposedly binding agreement to faithfully comply with the decisions of the Court, what precedent could it then give to other states wishing to try legal disputes? Following the law of stare decisis, other states can just easily withdraw from compulsory jurisdiction when the Court rules against them. The ICJ also, to show world unity provides for 15 judges to be elected on nine year terms, no two judges being nationals of the same country and if two are



Cited: United Nations Charter, International Law, Isagani Cruz, Manila, Philippines, 2002 International Court of Justice, Wikipedia, October 24, 2007, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_court_of_justice 21st Century Universal Encyclopedia, copyright 1983, p. 102, Australia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the main judicial organ of the United Nations. It replaced by the Permanent Court of International Justice after World War II, when it was made part of the UN Charter drafted in San Francisco in 1945, International Court of Justice .…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus 378 Week 3

    • 3675 Words
    • 10 Pages

    International law is a body of laws, regulations, and accepted practices by which different nations throughout the world interact with each other as well as with their own citizens and citizens of other countries. There are two basic categories of International Law, public International Law and private International Law, although the two tend to overlap frequently. Public International Law deals with relationships between different nations or between a nation and persons from another country. Private International Law generally deals with individual concerns, such as civil or human rights issues, not only between a government and its own citizens but also in how its citizens are treated by other nations.…

    • 3675 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pol 103 Study Guide

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    UN organs- the institution that takes care of violations of international law. 5 members have to come together and agree to punish a state (very rare)…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The whole system is headed by Senior President of Tribunals who is responsible for assigning judges to the chambers, looking after their general welfare and helping with any issues that may arise. The president has the power to issue practice directions in order to help tribunal judges maintain a unified procedure across every…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike other international bodies, these courts hold jurisdiction within each UN nation. Prosper, who served as lead counsel in the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, recounted how the case used a dormant convention from 1948. According to BBC, “it became the first international court to pass a judgment on genocide.” However, despite acknowledging the power of UN tribunals, Prosper questioned their capacity to effectively prevent war crimes. Often, it takes years to gather evidence, and the court cannot convict every individual involved.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran Vs America Summary

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Islamic Republic of Iran sought to invoke the International Court of Justice’s jurisdiction on the basis of a bilateral commercial agreement between the United States and Iran: Article XXI (2) of the Treaty of Amity, Economic, and Consular Rights.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States has support the creation of international courts to prosecute serious violations of human rights namely Nuremberg and Tokyo atrocities chase committed during World War II. Since then, the US is an important supporter of the creation of the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), both of which were approved by the Security Council. However, there was the different story for International Criminal Court (ICC). In fact, the United States did not ratify the Rome Statute of ICC nor participating in the Court which exercised their jurisdiction as a permanent international…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the October 2004 term those current nine members had served together for eleven years, more than any other set of judges in U.S. history (Calabresi, Lindgren). Since there has been a lack of vacancies, few Presidents have been able to set the course of the courts by appointing like-minded judges; in years prior to 1970 judges were appointed roughly every two years. This undermines the efficiency of the democratic checks and balances. It also prevents the infusion of ideas that spring from the generational interest of the time. If every president was able to appoint a judge then it is highly probable there will be more cultural diversity on the court. There would be younger judges on the bench with a mindset more nearly reflective of the interests and issues of a newer generation.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch08

    • 2456 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The International Court of Justice normally has authority to settle legal disputes only when nations voluntarily submit to its jurisdiction.…

    • 2456 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Order

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The devastation resulting from military conflicts in recent years has highlighted the need for the legal system to preserve and maintain world order. Through the UN, its legal processes, and non-legal responses, the legal system's effectiveness is questionable and somewhat debated within society and politics.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moot Court Outline

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since [first point], [second point], and [third point], Petitioner/Respondent respectfully requests that this Court finds ____ a violation of international law. Thank you.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “World order” is the term given to the balance of power among the nation states of the world. Differences between these nations can lead to a power imbalance, which affects world order. It can best be achieved through agreements between states and other international instruments that set out the ideal international standards of behavior for states on a number of issues. But conflicts arise between countries due to differences in cultural attitudes and the desire for extra territory. In order to settle such disputes the international community has legal bodies such as the United Nations to cooperate with countries to find solutions and be a leader in settling and spreading ethical standards. Their prime aim is to promote world order. But for society not only the autonomy of nations and the lack of enforcement power but also a range of other factors limit the effectiveness of such an organisations.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The International Criminal Court has been a legal mechanism which deals with international crime and which has had varying effectiveness. The ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal court and 111 countries have ratified its Rome Statute. The media article “Effectiveness of ICC without US Support”, Radio Netherlands, 18 June 2009, argues that, even though major powers like India, China and Russia are still not party to the Rome Statue of 2002, the Court has at least managed to put an end to those who may have otherwise escaped punishment from crimes against humanity. Steven Freeland’s article “Eradicating Evil is on Trial”, The Australian, 2008, highlights the fact that without the ICC and other international tribunals, many thousands of victims and their families would receive no justice at all.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6. Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. “Declaration of Judge Yusuf,” International Court of Justice, “Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo,” 22 July 2010. Print.…

    • 3520 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The justice system consists of three categories: the law enforcement officers, the criminal justice system, and the court system. The duties of the officers are to combat and prevent crime. They must apprehend anyone who has broken the law that was written by the legislators. Secondly, the criminal justice system is a system that develops a way to maintain social control and justifying crimes. They also sanction those who have broken the law with necessary criminal penalties. The criminal justice systems consist of law enforcing Institutions and the government. Lastly, the court which consist of the Judge, Jury and councilors; the judge sentences the accused, and the jury decides whether if the accused is guilty or not. The counselors’ duty is to either prove your innocence or to prosecute you.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays