Preview

Statement of Facts

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Statement of Facts
Unit 6 Assignment- Identify the Legal Issue(s) and Statement of Facts
December 19, 2010
Introduction to Legal Analysis Writing PA205
Holly Ewell

Unit 6 Assignment
Issues:
- Does a valid contract exist between Mr. Lotts and Mr. Bibe?
- Is Mr. Bibe bound by the contract he entered into with Mr. Lotts?
- Was Mr. Bibe intoxicated when he signed the purchase agreement to buy Mr. Lotts’s coffee shop?
- Did Mr. Lotts commit fraud against Bibe by purchasing alcohol prior to the contract agreement for the sale of his coffee shop?
Short Answers:
- A valid contract does not exist between Mr. Lotts and Mr. Bibe because Mr. Bibe had no power to make a contract of any kind because he was entirely without understanding.
- Mr. Bibe is not bound by the contract due to his intoxicated state at time of transaction.
- Mr. Bibe was absolutely intoxicated when he signed the agreement, having shared four bottles of wine with two other persons.
- Mr. Lotts intentionally took advantage of Bibe’s state of intoxication by contributing more wine and persuading him to sign the agreement.
Statement of Facts: Mr. I.M. Bibe has a bachelor’s degree in business administration, with an emphasis in accounting and a master’s degree in marketing. Shortly after obtaining his master’s degree he began employment with a computer chip company as a marketing assistant. Over the last several years he held various marketing positions and currently at age thirty-two holds a position as a marketing executive. Mr. Bibe and his group have reached their sales and marketing goals for the third year in a row, which has entitled each of them to another $150,000 bonus. Last Friday, at approximately 12:30pm., Mr. Bibe and three co-workers left the office to celebrate reaching their sales and marketing goal for last year. Mr. Bibe and two of the co-workers drank two bottles of wine with their lunch. The third co-worker, Owen Lotts only drank water. While Mr. Bibe and the other co-workers drank

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To enter into a contract, a party must be legally competent. Parties that cannot generally enter into contracts include minors and persons adjudged to be insane. Contracts entered into with either of these types of parties may be void and unenforceable.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 WEEK 4

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The client is Justin King, a winner of The “National Idol Regional Contest” last year on April 5th in Chicago, he was awarded a three year recording contract for $275,000 a year plus a percentage of sales with MCI Records. Mr. King further states that due to an accident on Interstate 57, just south of Chicago, he was unable to fulfill his contractual duties because of injuries sustained to his jaw and face. Mr. King goes on to state that on or around the 5th of April he had left his agents house after signing his contract. Mr. King states that he was driving his motorcycle on his way home. He said he was driving in the left hand lane going southbound on Interstate 57 when he noticed a beer truck going the same direction (he is unsure of the name it is either Coops, Coops Light, or Coops Ultra) and he suddenly notices a couple of cases of beer heading his direction. Mr. King stated he swerved left to…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Devils Own Wine Shoppe

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The article, “The Devil’s Own Wine Shoppe” revolves around the wine store owned by Bruce Nelson and his wife, Mary Lee. Being a business owner has been a life-long dream of Bruce. They opened the wine store in August 1974 with initial capital of $22,000 and an initial outlay of $17,258. In addition to owning the wine store, Bruce works fulltime as a car salesman while Mary Lee divides her time between working at the wine store and running the household. Bruce and Mary Lee have been placed in a position where they must decide if they should close the wine store, Bruce quit his fulltime job and devote his time completely to the wine store, hire additional help so that Mary Lee no longer has to work at the wine store, or continue as they are—Bruce dividing his time between the dealership and wine store and Mary Lee dividing her time between the wine store and home. The decision is contingent on Bruce and Mary Lee being able to transform the financial position of the wine store at it is currently operating at a loss.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law. Big Time Toymaker

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided?…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    White V. Gibbs Case Study

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the case of White v. Gibbs, the plaintiff, Mrs. Debbie White, sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act, a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd, 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states, the case was brought to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The defendants, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, sought summary judgment on their behalf. Mrs. White’s rebuttal was that the summary judgment should…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    South Delaware Coors

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this case is to analyze Larry Brownlow’s decision to invest and operate a Coors Distributor in south Delaware. Coors Beer is located in Golden, Colorado and has many distributors that are monitored closely throughout the country. Coors is known for its dedication to quality by suppliers, wholesalers, and its customers. Not only does Coors monitor wholesalers and distributors, the company also requires that the wholesaler and distributor us recycling equipment. Mr. Brownlow had $15,000 to research the decision and decide if he should own the South Delaware Distribution Center. $800,000 is needed for initial investment of the distributor. Since Coors will enter this area for the first time, it is believed that market share will continue to grow as the brand becomes established over time.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Couldn’t recall with certainty — at least the matter was disputed — how much alcohol…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 2.03(c) does not preclude Ms. Fleshman’s claim for negligent undertaking because section 2.03(3) applies only to those responsible for providing alcohol to others. First, the Radcliffes were not providing alcohol to the party, in fact they made no affirmative action to make alcohol available, and so do not fall under the purview of the statute. Second,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If the pharmacy get to keep its license and can respond financially to the penalties and sanctions resulting of this mistakes, this episode should serve to its owner as an attention call to make some changes on the company structure, where the middle managers and the rest of the employees are more accountable for not careful mistakes and become more conscious about the responsibility they have toward the community they work…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no objective evidence that this was a joke. Many business deals are transacted in a bar while drinking. The defendants’ did not outwardly make it know that they were kidding, the husband even whispered to his wife.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Fact Pattern

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Owning a business is very rewarding, however, it comes with many challenges as well. There are many torts and laws a business owner should be aware of in order to make sure they are abiding by the laws set forth before them. The characters have found themselves in a wide variety of situations that must be dealt with and handled accordingly.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cafe Latte

    • 3460 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Café Latte, a new espresso bar, is about to open in Pocatello, Idaho. The business was formed as a limited partnership between three siblings and a friend, Cynthia, Stuart, and Rob Chan, along with Jeff Burns, respectively. The Chans are somewhat knowledgeable about running a business since their parents have operated a restaurant for years, and Stuart Chan continues to manage the restaurant. The three siblings are the principals in the business, while Jeff Burns is primarily a partner for financial purposes only. Cynthia, having the most free time, has spent the most time working on the business opening. Stuart has procured the equipment for the bar, with Rob’s help. Stuart has become angry at Cynthia for not spending enough time in preparations, and feels that she and Rob are not doing their fair share of work. Stuart wants to buy out Cynthia’s share, but later just apologizes for his outburst. In order to avoid further conflicts, a work schedule was devised that permits Cynthia and Stuart to work schedules that do not overlap, and Rob will manage the operation.…

    • 3460 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    legal studies

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While Roberts is the manager of Tyler's Sports Bar & Grill and is in charge of operation, both Roberts and Jones are general partners for the business. "Three rules for liability in a partnership are: 1) Every partner is liable for his or her own actions. 2) Every partner is liable for the actions of the other partners. 3) Every partner is liable for the actions of the employees of the business" (QuickMBA, 3). The rules of a partnership state that if one partner breaks a law, the other one is responsible for that as well. The issue that Roberts and Jones are faced with is liquor liability. "The cash bar provider is responsible for all activities, including age verification and addressing intoxicated guests. The cash bar provider assumes virtually all alcohol-related liability" (Caudle, 2). For Davidson to be able to reach a blood alcohol level of .16 he would have been visibly intoxicated. Roberts' and his employees continued to serve Davidson although the risks were visible. Davidson then left the business intoxicated and involved himself in an accident. This leaves both Joe Roberts and Dr. Donald Jones responsible for the actions of Dan Davidson as a third party. "Section 47 P.S. 4-497 provides as…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics