Preview

Stakeholder Mapping

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
19125 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stakeholder Mapping
Report Cover Page

ACERA Project
2006 Round 1, Project 09

Title
Stakeholder mapping for effective risk assessment and communication
Author(s) / Address (es)
Jane Gilmour and Ruth Beilin, University of Melbourne
Material Type and Status (Internal draft, Final Technical or Project report, Manuscript, Manual,
Software)

Project final report
Summary
The aim of the report was to review and evaluate methods for stakeholder mapping. The report intended to explore applications in biosecurity risk management, and to recommend potentially fruitful direction for testing methods that might improve the efficiency of stakeholder interactions.
The report reviews a range of options and outlines in detail the definition and identification of stakeholders, and procedures for mapping influence and interest. It uses a workshop run by ACERA on volume of trade to illustrate the basic features of these methods. The report concludes by discussing the merits and weaknesses of the mapping approaches. It recommends their use to improve the efficiency of interactions and to improve transparency of process.

ACERA Use only
ACERA Use only
ACERA Use only

Received By:
ACERA / AMSI SAC Approval:
ACERA / AMSI SAC Approval:

Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis

Date:
Date:
Date:

Page 1 of 55

Stakeholder mapping for effective risk assessment and communication; ACERA Project 06/09

Dr Jane Gilmour; ACERA
Associate Professor Ruth Beilin, University of Melbourne

Review; April 2007

Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis

Page 2 of 55

Stakeholder mapping for effective risk assessment and communication

Acknowledgements
This report is a product of the Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis (ACERA). In preparing this report, the authors acknowledge the financial and other support provided by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), the University of Melbourne,
Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute (AMSI) and Australian Research Centre



References: Adam, B., Beck, U. and Van Loon, J. (2000). The risk society and beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, London, Sage Aligica, P. D. (2005). “Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change.” Global Prosperity Initiative, Working Paper # 58, Mercatus Center, George Mason University. www.mercatus.org/publications Allen, G., Suggett, D & Goodsir, B (1999) Althaus, C. E. (2003). "A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk." Risk Analysis 25(3): 567-588. Arnstein, S. (1969). “A ladder of citizen participation.” Journal of American Institute of Planners 35: 216-224 Beck, U., Bonss, Wolfgang and Lau, Christoph (2003). "The theory of reflexive modernization." Theory, Culture and Society Vol 20(2): 1-33. Beierle, T. C. (2002). "The Quality of Stakeholder-based Decision." Risk Analysis 22(4): 739-749. Beierle, T. C. & Cayford, J (2002). Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions Beilin, R., Paine, M., Njoba, J., Pryor, R. (2006). “Reconceptualising extension: a framework for managing complex social, economic and environmental issues in practice.” (unpublished) Biosecurity Australia (2003) Import Risk Analysis Handbook, Commonwealth of Australia www.daffa.gov.au/ba/ira/process-handbook Bocking, Stephen (2004) Nature’s Experts: Science, Politics and the Environment, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Rutgers University Press Brody, S. D. (2003). "Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management." Journal of Planning Education and Brugha, R. & Varvasovsky, Z. (2000) “Stakeholder analysis: A Review.” Health Policy and Planning 15(3):239-246 Bryson, J. M. (2004) “What to do when stakeholders matter: A Guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques.” Public Management Review 6(1): 21-53 Bryson, J. M. (2004). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations, John Wiley & Sons. Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Finn, C. B. (2004). Visible Thinking: Unlocking causal mapping for practical business results Burgman, M. (2005). Review of the Western Rock lobster Ecological Risk Assessment, 2005. Report to the Western Australian Fishing Industry Council. Carolan, Michael S. (2006). “Science, Expertise and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process.” Society and Natural Resources 19: 661-668 Carr, Anna J. L. (2004). "Why Do We All Need Community Science?" Society and Natural Resources 17: 841-849. Clarke, J. N. & Cortner, H. J (2002). The State and Nature: Voices Heard, Voices Unheard in America 's Environmental Dialogue Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). "A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance." The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92-117. Coady, Linda. (1999) “Good Stuff You Mostly Won’t Find on Anybody’s Website.” Unpublished paper delivered as the Doug Little Memorial Lecture, University of Northern British Columbia, cited in Svendsen and Laberge (2005 and 2006) Cosby, B.C Cummings, J. &. Doh, J. P. (2000). "Identifying Who Matters: Mapping key players in multiple environments." California Management Review 42(2): 83-104. Dambacher, J. M., Brewer, D., Dennis, D.M., Macintyre, M. & Foale, S. (2006). “Qualitative modelling of gold mine impacts on Lihir Island 's socio-economic system and reef-edge fish De Lopez, T. T. (2001) "Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia." Environmental Management Vol de Marchi, B. & Ravetz, R.. (1999). "Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach." Futures 31: 743-757. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. 1995, “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.” The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91 Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond - Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford, Oxford University Press. D.S.E. (2005). Effective Engagement: building relationships with community and other stakeholders. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran (1998) Making Strategy, The Journey of Strategic Management. 62 (5): 541-554 Finucane, Melissa (2000) “Improving Quarantine Risk Communication: Understanding Public Risk Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, Durham, Duke University Press

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The benefits of risk response control are improves effectiveness and efficiency of the risk approach during the project implementation. Risk response control includes the following elements throughout the project:…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt 230 Week 2 Notes

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stakeholders - Groups and individuals who affect and are affected by the achievement of the…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One may immediately assume when they hear the word "stakeholder" that it refers to the financial institution that has granted them the funding that made their program possible. This is certainly true, in fact, they are perhaps the most important and influential one. However, stakeholders are also staff members, program participants and their families, program administrators, the target population or community, and other outside parties who may be called upon for their services for further evaluation of the program.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forte Group has identified five stakeholders. Stakeholders are defined by Stanford Research Institute as, “those groups without whose support the organization would cease to exist.” (2)…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Oxfam and Tesco

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    |Stakeholders |Description |Point of view and influence on aims and |Description |Point of view and influence on aims and |…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    People often think of stakeholders as people with a monetary stake in an organization, but not necessarily true anymore. In the past, people considered stakeholders the people with a financial stake in the organization that would receive profits from the success of the business. Today stakeholders cover a much broader spectrum of people such as funders, administration, staff, volunteers, community, and the target population (Yuen/Terao, 2003). Each group of stakeholders has his or her influence on the program plan as well as the success of a human service organization and programs services (Yuen/Terao, 2003).…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Help Sheet: Ideas

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Introduction – start the assignment by describing why stakeholders have different perspectives. They all want their own way, see examples below to help……

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. PO9.4 Risk Assessment – Assess the likelihood and impact of risks, using qualitative and quantitative methods.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stakeholders are all those who need to be considered in achieving project goals and whose participation and support are crucial to its success. Stakeholder analysis identifies all primary and secondary stakeholders who have a vested interest in the issues with which the project or policy is concerned. This information is used to assess how the interests of those stakeholders should be addressed in a project plan, policy, program, or other action. The goal of a stakeholder is to develop a strategic view of the human and institutional landscape, and the relationships between the different stakeholders and the issues they care about most. Working with your key stakeholders to flesh out unambiguous and measurable objectives will set your program…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I have just been hired as an Information Security Engineer for a video game development company. I have previously identified all of the potential Threats, Vulnerabilities and Malicious Attacks for the videogame development company. The CIO have reviewed my report and has now requested that I draft a report analyzing and assessing any potential Malicious Attacks, Vulnerabilities and Threats that may be carried out against the company’s network. I will then choose a strategy for dealing with risk, such as mitigation, assignment, risk and avoidance. Next I will develop controls that will be used to mitigate each risk.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Invest in Apple Inc.

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Internal and external stakeholder identification and the fulfillment of their wants and needs are discussed also as part of this context.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder groups can serve as allies, third-party validators, or, conversely, third-party detractors. As part of both the Regulatory and Legislative Pathways, we will want to seek the support of groups that could be used as allies and validators and neutralize the groups that could be detractors.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The more critical the stakeholder-controlled resources are to the continued viability and success of the organisation, the greater the expectation that stakeholder demands will be addressed. As Roberts (1992,p.598) states that: a major role of corporate…

    • 1036 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rere

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The presentation below highlights and explains the different objectives of different stakeholder groups and begins to discuss the the influence of different stakeholder groups…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Whitewashing

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Stakeholder analysis is an important tool to utilize as it considers different viewpoints of stakeholders and the…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays