Preview

Southern Secession

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Southern Secession
Jake Wild
Period 7
DBQ Essay

Southern Secession of 1860 and 1861 “If slavery must not expand in your mind, it’s settled, we as a state secede from the governing of the Union and join a greater power, the Confederacy. We will no longer be hampered in your hatred towards our way of living. ”…“Then be on your way, I shall not dabble in your cruel pro-slavery reasoning. Just bear the knowledge in mind, we are stronger as a whole.” The Missouri Compromise kept inevitable split of the Nation at bay when it prohibited slavery north of the parallel 3630’ north line. This was later repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which implemented idea of popular sovereignty. This led to “Bleeding Kansas.” “Border Ruffians,” who were pro-slavery and the voted in Kansas started “Bleeding Kansas” so Kansas would be admitted as a slave state although, Kansas wanted to become a free state. Following this vote, many violent out bursts within Kansas occurred, around 80 altogether were killed. About three months later, the Battle of Fort Sumter began the Civil War. Lincoln’s election, conflicting views of slavery and the lack of power within the Southern government led to the Southern states seceding from the Union in 1860 and 1861. In the Presidential election of 1860, Lincoln was elected to help run the country, which led to the secession of the Southern states. According to George Templeton Strong, Lincoln put immediate pressure within his first 10 days in office when the South practically felt forced to commit to treason within a fortnight (two weeks.) The pressure forced upon the Southern states to commit to treason put them under immediate pressure, which was only driving the two regions farther and farther apart and closer to the Southern states seceding. According to the political map of the two regions, Lincoln won none of the Southern states, but he still won the election which made them feel as though they were powerless against the North which made the Southern states uneasy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Abraham Lincoln was elected president and vowed to abolish slavery, he promised that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists” (Source C). However, South Carolina did not believe in his ideas of slavery and chose to secede on December 20, 1860 along with six other states, which are Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. They seceded because the secessionists thought that the new Republican administration would subvert the right of southern slaveholders to carry their human property into the territories (pg. 407), but they did not believe that Lincoln would not interfere with slavery where it already existed. Due to the strong belief that…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Carolina voted to secede from the United States as a result of Abraham Lincoln's election to the Presidency. Lincoln had, over time, voiced strong objections to slavery, and his incoming administration was viewed as a threat to the right of the states to keep their institutions, particularly that of slavery, the business of the states. More states seceded, eleven in all, forming the Confederate States of America. The secession movement led to the Civil War.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Us History Ia Paper

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Following Abraham Lincoln’s election to the presidency in 1860, Southern states began seceding from the Union. Though personally opposed to slavery and convinced the United States was going to have to be all free or all slave states—"a house divided against itself cannot stand"—he repeatedly said he would not…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Election time came around to decide whether or not Kansas would be a free or slave state in 1854. During the election, hundreds of pro-slavery men from Missouri came and casted fraudulent ballots, which outvoted anti-slavery settlers. So Kansas adopted the same laws of Missouri including “Slave Code.” This angered the anti-slavery forces which then concluded into a civil war of Kansas. This war will be known as Bleeding Kansas.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who disagree with him and his point of view, joined the seceding states. Those who disagreed were the South. The south were devastated that Lincoln was the new president. They thought that the south had no voice in the national government (textbook). They were convinced that Lincoln and the congress are agreed on the topic of slavery ( textbook). Therefore, southern states came into conclusion that they didn't want to stay with a Republican president that is an abolitionist. However, Lincoln never stated that he didn't support slavery. People assumed that because of what he says in his speeches. Soon enough, southern states started seceding. South Carolina was the first to secede from the Union ( Packet Document 5). Later on, 7 other states such as Florida, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas has seceded (Packet Document 5). Although, the national government state that all states are independent ( Packet Document 5). So all those states have the full right to secede and no one can tell them…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Bleeding Kansas” was a term used by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune to describe the violence between pro and antislavery forces in the Kansas territory during the mid and late 1850s. The blame of who is responsible for this violence is placed on both sides yet it seems that the South should take more responsibility for the violence there. First off, the south starts the violence with no incitement from the North at the Raid on Lawrence. Then there was the Sumner-Brooks issue after Sumner delivered a insulting speech agains pro-slavery groups. Although the South started the violence, the North did have some responsibility. They retaliate after the Raid on Lawrence and cause deaths.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Bleeding Kansas

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas Territory became the center of attention in the battle between North and South over expanding slavery into the territories. Those southerners who voted for the Kansas-Nebraska Act (splitting the territory into two areas) assumed that Kansas would enter the union as a slave state. The Republican Party, however, wanted to repeal the Kansas-Nebraska Act and restore the provision in the Missouri Compromise that prohibited…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding kansas

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many Kansans will certainly remember the years 1854 to 1861. It was filled with bloodshed, rebellious actions, lynching, and more bloodshed. The groups responsible for this viciousness were the ignorant pro-slavery and the anti-slavery clashing in their differences. Within a few months, Kansas was invaded by raids and riots from left and right. Stephan Douglass pushed for The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which allowed the territory of Kansas to decide whether it would be free territory or slave territory, a practice known as popular sovereignty. It was obvious this decision was not going to be fixed properly or peacefully. People from other states soon decided to invade in the discussions and cross over into Kansas Territory to try and fix the votes making Kansas pro-slavery. From the south came people called Border Ruffians who made this issue a lot more difficult than it should be. They began a lot of violence, such as the “Raid on Lawrence” in attempt to force the acceptance of slavery. Why do they feel the need to invade in issues that should not be their business? In May 1856, Ruffians crossed the border and looted and burned multiple buildings, this act kicked open the door to more violent acts. A few days later the anti-slavery supporters caused the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre. John Brown attacked a pro-slavery settlement, killing five of the men. This controversy and violence was so large and out of control that it was impossible for federal authorities to contain it.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term “Bleeding Kansas” refers to the violence between those who were pro-slavery and those who were anti-slavery in Kansas. Many Northerners moved to Kansas as did Southerners to persuade the vote in an either pro or anti-slavery direction. The breaking point came in 1865 when proslavery raiders burned a part of the anti-slavery town of Lawrence. It related to popular sovereignty as each side tried to use it to their advantage in the voting booth.…

    • 2948 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rarely has there ever been a time of rest in this world full of restlessness. Not now, and certainly not back in 19th century America. Bleeding Kansas (also known as Bloody Kansas) was a brutal time after Kansas was created when pro and anti slavery forces couldn’t agree on the topic of slavery in America. From 1855 to 1859, the period before the Civil War was one of viciousness and barbarity. Before getting into the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Missouri Compromise, which was previously established in 1820, must be introduced.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the last month of 1860 many articles were written previous to, and following, the secession of South Carolina. South Carolina separated from the Union that constitutes the United States December 20, 1860. The articles: Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union, New-York Daily Tribune – The Right of Secession and, New-York Times – Peaceable Secession, are all writings specific to South Carolina’s secession from the US. All three sources were written within a week of each other and roughly a month before the first hostile act of the Civil war, and demonstrate the tension and division that the idea of secession put on both the Union and the Confederation. Since written from different perspectives and different people, the three articles have strong, but very different opinions on the secession of states such as and including South Carolina.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery In Secession

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Our new government is founded upon…the great truth that the Negro is not equal to the white man.” This quote by Alexander Stephens shows one of the basic driving principles behind slavery in the south. Slavery in America began long before the country existed. It began with Native Americans and transitioned to Africans after 1619 (Rosentreter, Lesson 2, 2018). The slave trade with Africa brought 600,000 African Slaves to the 13 colonies (Rosentreter, 2018). After, America was born slavery continued in the south while it was ended in the north. Slavery in the south then began to grow, after Eli Whitney’s cotton gin made it more profitable, then it had been in the past (Rosentreter, 2018). The south wished to protect…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Different methods were used to decide if slavery would be legal in a territory, such as the Compromise of 1850 to balance the slave and free states, or the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which implemented “popular sovereignty” and allowed people to vote on the issue of slavery themselves. However, proslavery Southerners found this to be unconstitutional. They believed outlawing slavery in any territory by the government couldn’t be done and it was a choice of the states to decide if it would be allowed or not. This disagreement between the southern states and the North contributed to the secession of the South. The 1860 South Carolina Declaration of Causes of Secession states, “The people of the State of South Carolina… declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union.” This shows what role states’ rights played in secession. The Civil War would later break out and bring the South back to the union after their loss, when the federal government would establish control once…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays