Preview

Federal Supremacy In The States

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
956 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federal Supremacy In The States
The debate of states’ rights versus federal supremacy is one that affects America today and has since the country was founded. It started with the writing of the Constitution in 1787 and the formation of Federalists and Anti-Federalists, who had opposing views on the document. The two major arguments were that a strong central government would eventually become tyrannical, and that a strong central government was needed for the nation to move forward. Years of conflict between the two sides occurred, over what form of government was best and what rights should be given to the states and government. continuing until the end of the Civil War when the power of the Federal government was finally cemented. The Constitution was written in 1787, …show more content…
Different methods were used to decide if slavery would be legal in a territory, such as the Compromise of 1850 to balance the slave and free states, or the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which implemented “popular sovereignty” and allowed people to vote on the issue of slavery themselves. However, proslavery Southerners found this to be unconstitutional. They believed outlawing slavery in any territory by the government couldn’t be done and it was a choice of the states to decide if it would be allowed or not. This disagreement between the southern states and the North contributed to the secession of the South. The 1860 South Carolina Declaration of Causes of Secession states, “The people of the State of South Carolina… declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union.” This shows what role states’ rights played in secession. The Civil War would later break out and bring the South back to the union after their loss, when the federal government would establish control once …show more content…
The writing of the Constitution, which the United States still operates under, was an important point in this dispute but did not end it. It was only the beginning, as the topic was sparked once more over slavery and territorial expansion. Because slavery wasn’t legal in the North and most people were loyal to the federal government, it wasn’t an issue. In the South, many people felt their way of life was threatened. Over the years the arguments turned into secession, where the Confederacy built their government to reflect their beliefs on slavery and wrote as much in their new Constitution. In the North, it was never referred to as a separate nation, showing the ultimate goal to reunite the union. This did happen when the South was defeated, slavery was officially outlawed in the United States, and powers were given back to the Federal Government as written in the US

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dual Federalism, from 1789 to 1865, divides nation power into two parts delegated to state governments and federal government accordingly. In agreement, they were not at liberty to interfere with each other. Politicians supported advocating a boundary between federal government and state government. As they proclaimed, “Remain independent from each other, and enjoy supremacy in their own areas of jurisdiction”. Of primary importance in dual federalism is states' rights, which reserve to the states all rights not specifically conferred on the national government by the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand the different eras of U.S. governmental history, one must first understand the history of the relationships between the federal government and state and local governments. The Constitution of the U.S. establishes a direct link between state governments and Congress. It gives Congress specific powers like declaring war and creating armies. The U.S. Constitution also bars states from performing acts that would undermine the federal government; some of those acts include making treaties, coining money, and making war. State governments can also create/destroy local governments. Federal, state, and local governments all interact with one another.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate has been seen time and time again throughout U.S history. The Federalists argue that a strong central government is necessary to protect the country and solve domestic problems. Whereas the Anti-Federalists argue that a strong central government cannot be trusted and that the states should have more power. This issue is an important concept today because it can be applied to so many of the debates on hot button issues such as abortion, government surveillance, gun rights, The ACA and many more. For example; in the issue of government surveillance the side that is most like the federalists in this case are those for government surveillance.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism in the United States has had several different concepts throughout our history. Dual federalism ran until around the Great Depression of the 1930s. Dual federalism has very distinct and rather clear lines of power for the national government as well as the state or local level of government. At times, it is referred to as “layered cake”. The national level very distinct and rule over much smaller, local, or state governments. There is a balance of power between the two, each maintains sovereignty that should not impact the other. Both national and state should work together, but still question the other to operate effetely. Dual federalism for This Nation seemed to cause more tension between the national and state levels than anything else. McCulloch v. Maryland is an early example of dual federalism. When the state of Maryland argues that the U.S. Constitution did not give the national government the power to make a National Bank since it was not an enumerated power and was unconstitutional. However, the court concluded that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that if the end goal is legitimate than what the national government is trying to do is constitutional.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism involves the sharing of powers between different levels of government. In the United States this relates to the government at national level (the federal government) and those at the level of the state. The United Kingdom is not a federal state instead it is a unitary state where power is held in one place (parliament). Federalism is the process of sharing power between a central government, in America’s case Washington, and the States. The US Constitution dictates what areas the Federal Government have control of and the areas that the States have control of. Amendment 10 of the Bill of Rights dictates that any area that is not a power of Congress, President or Supreme Court it is up to the States to decide. Dissimilarly to the UK, Britain has adopted the unitary system which means that there is just one main body of government as opposed to powers being distributed across the nation. Over time, federalism has adapted and changed and the theory of New Federalism was introduced after Nixon’s and Reagan’s administration and was further mentioned under George W. Bush’s presidency.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    State power, popular sovereignty/federal power, and the Bill of Rights were all issues rooted to the ongoing debate of federal v. state powers, causing major riffs between the federalist and…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    paper

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The debate between federalists and anti-federalists was very intense during the time the constitution was ratified. The anti-federalists wished to prevent a surplus of power in the national government by giving states the supreme power. Federalists wanted a larger central government for a good military and law enforcement. The anti-federalists had the most liberty under their form of government.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the U.S. Constitution being the longest written constitution throughout the whole world's history, there were many debates and arguments against it prior to its indoctrination (Wallace, 2015). Anti-Federalist mainly preferred small government tactics of the Democratic-Republic (Schultz, 2016). In contrast, the Federalist believed that its current government was too weak to enforce its laws under the Articles of Confederation (Wallace, 2015). In return, this brought about the Federalist fight for a stronger central government. Also, Federalist wanted to develop a first-class industrialist country that distributed throughout the whole world to other economies (Schultz, 2016). Federalist argued that a large, diverse, and populated country…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States constitution created a new type of government called federalism, which divided power between the states and the national government. But the proper balance of federalism has been debated throughout the history of the United States, Federalism, which signifies members of a group that are bond together with a governing representative head. Two time periods that there has been a debate on federalism was the Supreme Court under John Marshall in (1801- 1835) and the extension of slavery in (1820-1860).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Government Restrictions

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has experienced several different struggles as history shows us. The first was Dual Federalism. This period of time ran from 1790’s to 1930 where the powers that separated the federal and state governments were clearly stated as enumerated powers. (Federalism:US v The States) What we know today is new federalism. This period began in 1981 and continues today, were we see the states obtaining more and more power from the federal government. (Federalism:US v The States) The gaining of powers by the states also increases the difficult of states to maintain and comply with the powers and mandate’s they have received. (Federalism:US v The States) These conflicts are occurring more and more, for example, in 2015, an Alabama Chief Justice order the complete disregard of the federal courts decision to allow gay marriage in the states. (Palazzolo, 2015) Basically, a federal judgement was given that the states could not ban same-sex marriage, then a state judge made the decision that the federal government has no power to determine what the states can do. This is a good example of what the entire system was set up to limit the powers of each and every part of government, from the federal level to the…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been arguments over what power the state governments should have, and the powers the Federal Government should have. More recently there have been instances where the Federal Government was questionable in some of their actions. Today's Federal Government has too much power because issues such as gun control and healthcare would be better handled on the state level.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    federalism and rights

    • 642 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of federalism is a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between the federal government and the states (a packet of readings for URPA 5309, 2014-2015, p.1). As federalism is defined in many shapes and sizes, but basic principles of being a citizen has allegiance to more than one level of government. For example, in the United States, one is a citizen of both state and nation. “Do the states tend to promote individual liberty, or to undermine it?” The debate under a formal federalism as a constitutional system yields to specifics some of the advantages and some of the disadvantages.…

    • 642 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the course of American history federalism has developed. The boundaries and balance between the state and national government have altered significantly, at different points in time, within the twentieth century. The responsibility of the national government stretched out dramatically, and it continues to spread out even within the twenty-first century.…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Governments are a big part of many societies. There are many forms of governments and they are changing constantly to meet the proper needs of its people and to help things function as best possible. The United States, in the late 1700’s was doing just this. The United States Constitution was ratified by its ninth state and took effect on June 11th, 1788. This Constitution created a new type of government known as federalism. Federalism is a political system in which power is shared between the national government and the state governments. The United States included the system of federalism in the Constitution for important reasons and there were powers that were granted and/or shared to the governments involved.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism

    • 2917 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Federalism in the United States has evolved quite a bit since it was first implemented in 1787. Two major kinds of federalism have dominated political theory. There is dual federalism, in which the federal and the state governments are co-equals. Under this theory, there is a very large group of powers belonging to the states, and the federal government is limited to only those powers explicitly listed in the Constitution. As such, the federal government has jurisdiction only to the extent of powers mentioned in the constitution.…

    • 2917 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays