First myth is related to people attitude and sacrifice of personal traits for the good of the team to become a part of the mechanism that consists of similar entities. The myth is entirely wrong, teams diversity is a key to success, if every member would perform the same tasks constantly, more complex jobs would not be accomplished. Contrast and diversity in this case helps with achievements and is desirable.
Second myth is connected with conflicts, its unhealthy outcomes and leading toward failures. However, it …show more content…
To demonstrate it we need to divide people into three groups;
First group - People who likes to work in teams, focused on supporting the team, its concepts and with great social skills. Second - Neutral people, focused on the job, achieving the goal with vision, however they can work alone or in a team. Third - People with aversion towards team setting, “Solo leaders” with need of control and desire to be in the center of everything. The Myth is unreal, individuals are unique, therefore teamwork is not for …show more content…
According to Johnson & Johnson, (1995). “There Are two types of conflict that occur frequently and regularly within cooperative groups—constructive controversy and conflict of interests” Both types of conflict can be used for advantage, in the case of Constructive Controversy, different views, perceptions, theories if resolved positively lead toward faster and more efficient process and better outcomes. Conflict of Interests is more direct, it involves obstructing actions of fellow team member. However, when members of the team mediate and achieve unity a new level of trust is established and the productivity is amplified considerably in the future tasks. Moreover, positive interpersonal relationships within the team are the key to resolve every