Preview

Similarities Between King Jr And David Thoreau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
854 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between King Jr And David Thoreau
“If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” This quote by Thomas Jefferson shows that even though there are risks, stand up for what is right and just. The law is not always the right thing and people who disagree are considered, Civilly disobedient. Civil disobedience is standing up for what is right even if it’s the law. Two men who took a stand for their right is Martin Luther King Jr. and David Thoreau. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail” is about MLK Jr.’s experience with civil disobedience. MLK Jr. himself, committed an act of civil disobedience and stood up for what was right. As did David Thoreau in “From Civil Disobedience”. These men knew the law and the consequences that would follow, but they understood what would benefit from their act of disobedience.
Anyone can be disobedient to the law, just like MLK Jr. and David Thoreau, but understanding and dealing with the consequences goes hand in hand. If
…show more content…
Breaking the law and saying it was something that a person doesn’t agree with is not appropriate. Civil disobedience is breaking the law, because it is unjust. The law is wrong and the only way to change it would be to take a stand and change it. That is only when being civilly disobedient is acceptable. “America is not a perfectly just society, yet not all of our unjust laws invite or compel a response of civil disobedience” (“More on What…”). There should always be reasoning behind being disobedient to the law. “In sum, civil disobedience can be an effective and necessary tool for changing unjust laws that require direct obedience. It tends to be far less useful for opposing unjust laws that do not require direct obedience. And it is utterly useless as a tool for promoting injustice” (“More on What…”). Many people will take a stand for what they believe in and if the law is unjust, than it’s always acceptable to do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. for the first time for this essay, I realized what true civil disobedience was. Rev. King understood that his…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discussion topic 1 PHI208

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is our duty to follow all the laws, they are in place to protect us. Sometimes we have to just keep it to ourselves the ones that don’t make sense, and still follow them. I don’t think we have to choice as to when we don’t want to obey the law, the law is the law.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a team when discussing the topic of civil disobedience and its effects on changing law, as a group we all agreed yes. Civil Disobedience is a method of disobeying…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Thoreau and King rely heavily on ethos to get their points across. The intended audience of both is similar; a group of people with similar morals as the writers, but who have neglected action for various reasons. King also appeals to pathos, describing the plight of the colored man vividly. King’s audience is largely aware of this situation already, but he uses it to drive them to action rather than simple awareness. On the other hand, Thoreau appeals little to pathos, focusing instead on logic and ethics.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, the third president and author of the declaration of independence, once exclaimed, “If a law is unjust a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” Jefferson declares that at any cost if one finds a law wrong than it is his duty to stand against it for the common good. He implies that people should never stand idly by or blindly follow a law that is immoral only because it is the easiest way. Knowing when a protest against government is needed was also what the writers Martin Luther King, Henry David Thoreau, and Arthur Miller wanted to instruct to their readers. King was a significant activist and leader of the civil rights movement who was the cause of many amendments and progress for the rights of African Americans. His A Letter From…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anyone can say that a law is unfair and unjust. However, who is really willing to accept the consequences for going against this law? Is breaking this law really worth the punishment? The government is the one to decide whether a law is reasonable, but what if a member of the public believes that a law is not? Should he rebel against this law? Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. answered yes to this question and believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They both believed that government had many flaws. They shared many beliefs in the same subjects concerning Civil Disobedience but had many different views on how the government should work and how the citizen should be treated by society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ralph Beachum

    • 3085 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Martin Luther king Jr. once said, “They will be the young high school and college students, the young ministers of the gospel and a host of their elders, courageously and non-violently sitting in at lunch counters and willingly going to jail for conscience sake.” Men follow their conscious until their perspective of conscience being is distorted. They often see the moral light but are side-tracked by the world at large. Ultimately, every man is a product of their surroundings; thus, they tend to assimilate to what they know. The conscience innovation is throbbing with potential, impetuous, once asserted; it can reconstruct the foundation of all statutes. In Thoreau’s, “Civil Disobedience”, and King’s, “A Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” there are direct references to the methods and reasons for civil disobedience; however, the backgrounds of these letters, although distant, converge from different settings.…

    • 3085 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate was thrust into a hotbed of discussion during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. In 1964, Morris I. Leibman was an avid anti-civil disobedience activist. He argued that there is no reason for any citizen to find an excuse to break the law because when people agree to enter society, they accept the rules that society establishes. Once you break these laws, there is no purpose to society existing in the first place. He argues that if you give leeway to certain circumstances in the law, where do you draw the line? In his mind, civil disobedience is deplorable and believes it’s the wrong way to create change. Continuing with this train of thought, Herbert Storing argued that civil disobedience would likely die out because of its irrelevance to today’s problems. He found it’s attempt to combine revolution and conventional political action into one as a blend of ideas ineffective in its approach for change. Both of these men wrote their responses to civil disobedience at the height of the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and both agreed that black people deserved equal opportunity under the law, but they felt that civil disobedience was a regressive tactic…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau expresses a need for resistance of authority. Thoreau genuinely believes that if one does not stand up to an authority figure whom they disagree with, nothing will change for the better. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau states, “I was not designed to be forced.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Thoreau considers civil disobedience as a duty rather than a right because he believes that the individual should “make known what kind of government would command his respect,” which “will be one step toward obtaining it” (941). When a civil law, or a law established by the government contradicts with the divine law, it becomes a duty for an individual to disobey the civil law. In his essay, Thoreau describes majority of the men as “machines,” serving the state “not as merely as men mainly” (941). Thoreau believes that in order to preserve the moral sense of the individual, civil disobedience is necessary and it is the duty of the people to go against the civil law.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I negate that civil disobedience, or “the refusal to obey certain laws, demands, or commands of a government, or of an occupying international power”, according to the dictionary, should be permissible. The rule of law provides the necessary structure for maintaining justice. Civil Disobedience is not permissible for three reasons: It sabotages democratic process, is self-defeating, and although a part of history, that does not make it morally just. Civil Disobedience is not permissible because it sabotages democratic process. Deliberately breaking the law violates the procedural rules that an operating democracy determines.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are all under the assumption that the laws of the land are in place to protect our human welfare and to safe guard our property from being unjustly taken from us. It is not about the intent of the law but how the law is applied; history is obviously full of examples. I feel that it is always okay to stand up for what you believe in even if you stand alone.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that, while this argument has a little merit, it is an extremely exaggerated slippery slope. It is true that people may join in disobedience, but if the law is unjust and is disobeyed within the guidelines I put forth later, people joining the disobedience would be a good thing. It would show the support of a strong minority, and may even help the minority to become a majority.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays