Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Is an Unjust Government Better Than No Government at All?

Good Essays
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is an Unjust Government Better Than No Government at All?
Is an unjust government better than no government at all?

INTRO: I do not agree that an unjust government is better than no government at all. Is it really logical to give your allegiance to a country whose government violates principles of fairness? I would have to agree with St. Augustine's famous quote, "an unjust law us no law at all," and therefore I think that an unjust government is no government at all.

CONTENTIONS:

a.) IF YOUR GOVERNMENT IS NOT LOYAL TO YOU THEN YOU DO NOT OWE IT YOUR ALLLEGIANCE. I do feel that one has a moral responsibility to obey just laws, but I also feel that one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.
• For example, America would still be just a province of Great Britain if it wasn't for our forefathers who stood up and rebelled against the laws which were clearly unjust.
• If it was acceptable for them to rebel, then it is definitely acceptable now.
• We are all under the assumption that the laws of the land are in place to protect our human welfare and to safe guard our property from being unjustly taken from us. It is not about the intent of the law but how the law is applied; history is obviously full of examples. I feel that it is always okay to stand up for what you believe in even if you stand alone.

b.) THE GOVERNMENT IS BASICALLY OVERSEEN BY THE RICH; THEREFORE THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT FAIR TO ALL.
• The reality is that society is predominantly controlled from the top. This is not a statement about whether this is right or wrong; it is merely a statement of fact.
• To deny the possibility of positive change at the top of society is to deny the possibility of positive change at all levels of society.
• Therefore I think that no government is better than an unjust government, because if you are not at the top of society then you basically don't have a say in what is best for you and others who are at your same economic status.
• If society is to be a better place all levels of society must be involved in the change process: rich, poor, powerful, and powerless.
• I feel that it is impossible for there to be equality in government if there is no equality in economy.

c.) OUR COUNTRY'S GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS WERE ACCOMPLISHED BY PEOPLE WHO FOUGHT FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVED IN.
• Examples include winning an 8 hour work day, ending child labor laws, ending slavery, and ending segregation.
• As long as people obey unjust laws we will have an unjust government. Like my ancestors in the labor and civil rights movement, we have to be willing to take protest to the next level.
• These victories were not won through obedience of the law, or by respecting unjust authority; they were won through acts of civil disobedience.

CONCLUSION: I think that when the government operates in the corporate interest and against the public interest, the citizens do not owe it their allegiance. We are all born with individual rights as human beings, which the government should not, under any circumstances take away. Therefore, an unjust government is not better than any government at all.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Declaration of Independence was written and created with the purpose of the colonists gaining freedom from Great Britain. The colonists were tired of being taken advantage of with strict laws and crazy taxes. This document was approved on July 4th, 1776. It was hand-written by Thomas Jefferson. The first part explains why it was written, the second part contains how King George has failed as a King and how he has violated them, and finally the third and last part of the Declaration of Independence is the actual Declaration and all of the colonies are said to be the United States of America.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    because they wanted to challenge the power of eastern elites for the stake of the…

    • 3397 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the British had won the Revolutionary War, I would not be sitting here writing this paper and you would not be reading this right now. Americans would not be Americans, but British. America would not even be around now and there would be no 50 states. Most of our ancestors would not have came if the British beat the Americans. Our ancestors came for independence, land, and economic gain, they came for a better life then they had where they were.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the first draft of The Declaration of Independence, people’s rights were being ignored by the King. Thomas Jefferson once said “mankind is more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed” (Jefferson,1), this is telling us that the people are allowing the corrupt government to take over their life and put them through suffering that they do not deserve or want. “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson, 1), this one ruler mentality also known as absolute monarchy lets the ruler have full control of everything and has no limits on his wishes or power. This type of government allowed the one ruler or king to take away people’s right to be heard, seen and ultimately their happiness.…

    • 813 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau states in the text that this exact lack of scrupulous intentions would affect the decision-making and state of mind of any individual citizen. "If... the machine of government... is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." "It is not a man's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support." (On Duty of Civil Disobedience.) Thoreau explains that every citizen has the obligation to oppose all unjust occurrences and has his or her own individual responsibility within their own…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is known that a state without government is a state in chaos and confusion. What the best possible form of government should be has been debated by political philosophers over time. To vigorously ensure the well-being of a state, the government of that state should be absolute or one in which all power is vested in a single ruler. A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because God establishes kings, decisions would be made quicker, and there would be less conflict between differing parties.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this we can form the idea that the government can be considered as working against the good of the people. Not everything can be blamed on the government though. James Madison says that the most common source of factions have been the unequal…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people would argue that society would be far better off without dominant groups. These individuals would argue that without a dominant group in control of society, life would be more just for everyone. This however, is not always the case. In reality, this is never the case. The fact is, utopian societies exist only in works of fiction. It is in human nature for the powerful to oppress the weak. Dominant individuals will always seek to govern the masses, and in the majority of scenarios, human greed overpowers justice. A famous German philosopher, known as Karl Marx, intently studied these aspects of human society. He identified the major problem facing every society in the twentieth century: the weak had no voice in society, and were therefore treated unjustly. Marx came to the realization that there were essentially only two kinds of people in every society. A person is either a “have” or a “have not”. The “haves” are the educated elite portion of the population who govern society and control the masses. On the other hand, the “have-nots” are basically the bottom portion of the social hierarchy,…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years people have been taking and having to follow laws may they be just or unjust. A natural response for every individual if not most, is to simply go along with these laws. However, there is a debate on whether we should challenge these laws through civil disobedience or not. Ultimately, it is the duty of moral citizens to engage in immediate civil disobedience in response to recent police shootings, which can be can be considered an abuse of power by the government.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that, while this argument has a little merit, it is an extremely exaggerated slippery slope. It is true that people may join in disobedience, but if the law is unjust and is disobeyed within the guidelines I put forth later, people joining the disobedience would be a good thing. It would show the support of a strong minority, and may even help the minority to become a majority.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for a government to function it needs to have order. If we allowed everyone to make government decisions, then nothing would ever be accomplished. No one person has had the same life experiences, making it a challenge for people to…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those Who Are Elected By Their People, Community, Nation, And/Or Country For Leadership Should Do Just That; Lead. They Should Lead Their People Into Prosperity Not Poverty. When Their People Are In A Pit They Should Be Doing All They Can To Pull Them Out. Those In “Power” Need To Remember Those Who Helped Them Gain There Position. Actions Speak Louder Than Words! Therefore In My Opinion The Government IS Responsible For The Disadvantaged.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Or should the government step in to guarantee equal outcomes? An idea that every citizen had the opportunity to thrive, succeed and achieve based on their hard work and abilities. People are free to succeed or fail based on their own qualities. The government did not provide advantages or a “safety net” for its citizens. It’s essentially up to a person whether or not he or she succeeds or fails. The government just gives you the key and it’s up to you whether you open the door or keep it close.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    importance of government

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In my view people do need government because the government does a lot of things they don’t get recognition for.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    To Aristotle, there are three just forms of government and that they have an unjust counterpart system. The three just governments are: monarchy, aristocracy, and politeia. Monarchy is the rule of one person for the benefit of the city. Aristocracy is the rule of the few, best, who rule for the benefit of the city. Politeia is the rule of the many for the common benefit of the city. The unjust counterpart to monarchy is tyranny, the unjust counterpart to aristocracy is oligarchy, and the unjust counterpart to politeia is democracy (Steinberger,…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays