Preview

Should Lewis Powell Have A Big Punishment For Killing The President?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Lewis Powell Have A Big Punishment For Killing The President?
Killing the president is a bad choice and all the people that were involved in killing the president should be punished. George Atzerodt was told and forced to kill Lincoln, but in the end he did not, but he still deserves a punishment for being part of the group that killed him, but, he should not have a big punishment like most other people. I think George Atzerodt needs to be in jail for about 3-5 years, so he would not get in another group of people and be forced to kill someone again.

Lewis Powell had to murder the secretary of state seward. They all didn’t have a choice, Booth was a tough leader and he was very strict about his goal. I think that Lewis Powell should get a punishment that is bigger than George’s because he did what
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bowe Bergdahl Case Study
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bowe Bergdahl Case Study

    “Execution as punishment is barbaric and unnecessary,” – Kate Mulgrew. Throughout history execution has been one of the popular go-to punishments. However, is it necessary in today’s world? A highly suggested punishment for Bergdahl is that he should be executed. After all, he did go against the law, which gave him the title “traitor”. Even Donald Trump has mentioned in multiple previous interviews and rallies that Bergdahl is a “dirty, rotten traitor” and also saying that “he should have been executed”. Looking at how the United States government has evolved, should we not be way past the idea of executing a fellow U.S. citizen?…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Closing Argument on the Defentants of the Boston Massacre
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Closing Argument on the Defentants of the Boston Massacre

    I John Adams is here today to address the jury of the innocence of the men that were involved in the killing of 5 civilians. On March 5, 1770 a riot broke out on the streets of Boston causing mayhem; British soldiers arrived on the scene to find the civilians out of control, and in order to gain order knowing the risk that was being taken they put their lives in danger to get a furious mob under control. No one man deserves to have his life taking and neither does he deserves to have it threatened and that is exactly what these men were experiecneing as they stood befor a raging crowd of civilians as they tore threw the streets of Boston. To have you're life threatened is just as bad as having it taken away from you ; Iam not saying that what they did was right but Iam saying that they were given no other choice considering the circumstances they were put under it was either kill or be killed and if they had not made the decision to take out the threat it would be civilians here today instead of these soldiers, If you were put in their shoes would you have not made the same choice? or is it just these soldiers who find that their life is valuable enought to protect? They were harassed, objects were thrown at them and they were threatened. Please allow these men to have a fair trial and please do not pass judgement upon them for they felt that they were doing something in defence of them selves as for every one of the world wants to be protected and when ever they feel threaten they will react the same way these men…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fat Pooper: Questions And Answers
    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fat Pooper: Questions And Answers

    Andrew Johnson should not have been convicted because you can't throw out a president just because you dislike the president and don't agree with his policies. If you could convict a president because of those reasons, we would be going through presidents left and right.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Killing Lincoln The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever Analysis
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Killing Lincoln The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever Analysis

    The book "Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination that Changed America Forever" by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard was written to share the story of Abraham Lincoln’s death. This great book was written from a third person point of view, and many bits and pieces were taking from Lincoln’s journals. The whole book approaches the Civil War right off the bat and creates a hostile background because of the war and the plan to kill Lincoln. I would suggest that before you read this book you prepare yourself for many important people that come and go throughout the story. It may be kind of hard to understand the book if you do not keep track of all of the characters, and write them down.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Professor Johnson's Death Penalty E0: The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Professor Johnson's Death Penalty E0: The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States

    E3- The founders believed that capital punishment, and the death penalty specifically, is constitutional and should be allowed, so long as the due process…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mary Surratt's Assassination
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mary Surratt's Assassination

    Mary Surratt was hanged on July 7, 1865 because she was said to have played a role in the assassination of the president. So, should she have been hanged? Many sources say that her role in the assassination plot means that her sentence was reasonable. Contrarily, some sources say that she was wrongly accused and was just helping John Wilkes Booth because he was a friend and customer. The charges against Mary Surratt are reasonable considering her role in Lincoln’s assassination.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Abraham Lincoln's Assassination
    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary Of Abraham Lincoln's Assassination

    This paper will first talk about what was happening the North and South at the time like the mood and tone of the war. In the second paragraph it will present statements from some of the conspirators like their motive and just what they had to say about their actions. After that, it will go in detail about the facts of the assassination including when, where, and how it happened. Next, we will talk about the aftemath of this event and how it changed America and they way the nation protect our president now days. Finally, the conclusion on the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the other victims. Abraham Lincoln wasn’t the only one to be murdered or attempted to be murdered on April 14th, 1865. He was one of many on the hitlist for a group…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Killing Adolf Hitler in Wwii Is an Acceptable Choice to Ending the War with Germany
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Killing Adolf Hitler in Wwii Is an Acceptable Choice to Ending the War with Germany

    Assassination attempts on Adolf Hilter during World War II were unsuccessful. However, it was the belief of many Allied leaders that this would effectively end the propaganda machine of Nazi Germany. Eliminating Adolf Hitler would effectively end the war with Germany and, thus, assassination attempts were considered a viable option. In particular, should one have been successful, it might have saved many lives and needless casualties in the quest to end the war. Hitler's suicide marks a huge event in history. When leaders fall, their regime often falls with them. Hitler had a regime that can really only be described as evil. We had to do everything we could to stop that. Assassination is not always a justifiable action, but in this situation, it certainly was. The use of assassination as a means to end a war should only be used against those individuals who are the most inhumane and unreasonable. If there is no other way to stop their mass killings of other human beings, I believe assassination is a viable option. If Hitler had been assassinated early on, it might have even prevented World War 2. And it was clearly his naked aggression that was the causus belli. I would not normally support the assassination of freely-elected heads of state, but this situation was so stark and so rife with the prospect of giant-scale warfare that one man's killing would have been morally justifiable. It's clearly for the greater good to kill one man if that would mean saving millions from a similar fate. From both a legal and a moral standpoint, I think the assassination of Hitler would have been justifiable. While ideally, he could have gone through our legal system and then been punished, it was well known how evasive he was and how capable he was of planning an escape. Capturing him alive was probably not a viable option. He should have been assassinated so he was unable to harm anyone else. it might not have stopped the war, but it would have saved millions…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    George Trevino The 300 Kid
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    George Trevino The 300 Kid

    George's minimal involment in two previous cases one being a mere passenger in a stolen car, and the other an unarmed latecomer to the schoolyard fight- he was charged with assault with a deadly weapon and, car theft, both felonies. Later he took part in an Armed Robbery where one person was shot, the ringleader of the robbery and besides him no one was harmed. Instead George was looking at up to 29 years for this sentence. A bit unfair for a child that was bounced around from foster home to foster home, who really didn't no any…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Abraham Lincoln Changed America
    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Abraham Lincoln Changed America

    Abraham Lincoln is arguably one of the most influential presidents that our nation has had to this day. He fought to abolish slavery through the beginning phases of the Emancipation Proclamation, and attempted to unify our country once again. Though Lincoln accomplished an incredible amount in office and played a vital part in how America functions today, it was his assassination that truly changed America forever. In the book, Killing Lincoln written by Bill O’ Reilly and Martin Dugard, these co-authors explore what led the assassination and the advances to track down Wilkes Booth and everyone that helped him.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Abraham Lincoln's Assassination Wrong
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was Abraham Lincoln's Assassination Wrong

    A large group of people believed killing Lincoln was a necessity to keeping slavery and the southern way of life (O’Reilly, 27). John Wilkes Booth thought it was his duty to kill the president. His hatred was so strong. In fact, he believed he was “the only man in America who can end the North’s oppression,” (O’Reilly, 26). People were wrong to think Lincoln would remove the Constitution because he did not have the power to do so. The Constitution authorized slavery so Lincoln left this alone and did not technically try to change that (Pruitt). Although, Lincoln did make the first steps to ending slavery, and that was one of the best things our country did. Slaves were treated as though their only life purpose was to help their owners. It was very “degrading.” The owners physically forced the slaves to work and if they did not, they were threated or beaten (Hamner). Slavery was, no doubt, horrible and Lincoln could see that and attempted to stop it. This was no reason to kill…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Alexander Hamilton Unjust
    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Alexander Hamilton Unjust

    The assassination of Alexander Hamilton was unjust because he fought for the rights of people such as voting rights… (Specific people)... although many people believed that he had a thing against freedman because he was a slave owner himself. After being in jail trying to convince people that freedman should not have full citizenship rights such as said in “on Reconstruction” (Groff 1). This was a thing that was like a review on Alexander hamilton talking about the things that he did from the early ages to horrible sudden death. As said in the text “ If, on the other hand, freedman were given full citizenship rights, including voting rights, it would bolster the amount of votes for republicans, which were the people who drove the reconstruction era.” this would mean as later on in life the 14th amendment was finally ratified and acknowledged by the people that slavery is no more and later came the 15th amendment, which was the right to vote for different races, that would , mean that the rights of freedmen were finally declared. Although that many people did not…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln's Assassination Research Paper
    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln's Assassination Research Paper

    Did you know that John Wilkes Booth’s original plan was to kidnap Abraham Lincoln? Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth on April 14, 1865. Booth snuck into the presidential booth and shot Lincoln in the head with a pistol. Escaping Booth broke his leg, but worked through the pain. Booth was captured 12 days later. The morning of April 15, Abraham Lincoln died. The assassination of Lincoln shocked the country. He was the first president to be assassinated. Even though John Wilkes Booth was desperate, the assassination of him was unjustified because John Wilkes Booth didn't have to kill him for his stand on politics and no power over the decision for Lincoln to win the election.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Abraham Lincoln's Assassination Research Paper
    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln's Assassination Research Paper

    The sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, was assassinated on April 14, 1865. This period of time in American history will forever be marked by his tragic death. He was shot by John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate sympathizer at Ford’s Theater. Booth, along with Lewis Powell and George Atzerodt planned to bring chaos among the federal government and have the Confederacy step in to overthrow them (Boardman, 1865). His plan succeeded in the death of President Lincoln. However, his scheme to overthrow the government backfired. Lincoln was not viewed very well by the people before his assassination. However, due to Booth’s decision to murder Abraham Lincoln,…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincolns Assassination
    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Abraham Lincolns Assassination

    In the year 1810, Abraham Lincoln was the man who had eyes for the future. He had remarkable hopes, dreams and goals he wished to accomplish for his country. He was a member of the union and was working towards freeing the slaves, and crushing the confederacy. Most of the country supported him and his goals. Yet there were still a few states that supported slavery and wanted Lincoln dead. Confederates were worries that Lincoln would take away their rights. However the confederates did not see that Lincoln was made for greatness. Unfortunately, his life was cut short by: John Wilkes Booth, Abraham Lincoln’s assassin. On April 14, 1865, John Wilkes Booth became the first person to assassinate an American president when he shot and killed Abraham Lincoln in his box at Ford’s Theater in Washington (Kauffman).…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics