Preview

Closing Argument on the Defentants of the Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Closing Argument on the Defentants of the Boston Massacre
Teanna Palmer april 26, 2011
Mrs. Levertte

I John Adams is here today to address the jury of the innocence of the men that were involved in the killing of 5 civilians. On March 5, 1770 a riot broke out on the streets of Boston causing mayhem; British soldiers arrived on the scene to find the civilians out of control, and in order to gain order knowing the risk that was being taken they put their lives in danger to get a furious mob under control. No one man deserves to have his life taking and neither does he deserves to have it threatened and that is exactly what these men were experiecneing as they stood befor a raging crowd of civilians as they tore threw the streets of Boston. To have you're life threatened is just as bad as having it taken away from you ; Iam not saying that what they did was right but Iam saying that they were given no other choice considering the circumstances they were put under it was either kill or be killed and if they had not made the decision to take out the threat it would be civilians here today instead of these soldiers, If you were put in their shoes would you have not made the same choice? or is it just these soldiers who find that their life is valuable enought to protect? They were harassed, objects were thrown at them and they were threatened. Please allow these men to have a fair trial and please do not pass judgement upon them for they felt that they were doing something in defence of them selves as for every one of the world wants to be protected and when ever they feel threaten they will react the same way these men

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing Boston & Kent State Massacre the two Hundred year difference. There are similarities of Boston and Kent State Massacre event similarities, both of them brought something up with the government to make a large crowd of people, the Boston Massacre was started by a series of events included by civilians of colonist and soldiers trying to calm against the angry protesters. The Shootings of State University were a result of tensions between students and the Ohio National Guard, as the students where mad of the protested Vietnam war, The U.S. will start bombing in Cambodia, there were no orders to shoot the students but they killed 4 students anyways. The resemblance of the two massacres are like the same, both over the government, both…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crispus Attucks was an African-American man killed during the Boston Massacre and thus believed to be the first casualty of the American Revolution.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In reference to your point about the Revolutionaries, I was actually discussing this with my sister a few days ago. Technically speaking, Revolutionaries can be considered terrorists--they tried to instill fear in the British government (for example, the Boston Tea Party) for political purposes (specifically protesting taxation). In fact, according to an article titled, "Boston Tea Party Was Act Of Terrorism? Texas Public Schools Teaching New History Lesson," some schools in Texas are even examining it as such. Specifically, teachers are instructed to read the following prompt to their students:…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dear Billy Bob, it’s your cousin Samantha writing to ask you, how are you still a loyalist?Have you not heard about what has happened in Boston.One of the many laws that your king passed was the Quartering Act,this law allowed any troop to barge into your home with out your consent.Imagine having to provide for a stranger for as long as they liked while supporting yourself.Although this not all,an event called the Boston Massacre occurred on March 5th 1770.Gun shots and yelps were heard in the center of town,killing 5 colonists.This event caused an abundance of anger calling for the removal of troops in Boston.If you are still loyal to the king at this point here is another reason why you should become a patriot.The Tea Act was passed three…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Samuel Adams was born on September 27th 1722 in Boston in the British colony of Massachusetts. Samuel Adams was the son of Samuel Adams Sr. and Mary Adams. Samuel Adams family was Puritan and belonged to the Old South Congregational Church. After Graduating Harvard in 1740, he began earning his master’s degree. In his thesis he argued whether “It is lawful to resist the Supreme Magistrate, if the Commonwealth cannot otherwise be preserved” to which he believed it was (Allen, 5).…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Boston Massacre Trials

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After this whole case, and a lot of thought, I find each of the eight British soldiers guilty of voluntary manslaughter. They were not found guilty of murder because they were provoked, but not to the point where they killed anybody under self-defense, which would deem them as not guilty. They are found guilty for manslaughter because they were being threatened, but not to the point where their lives were in any danger. In the trial, John Adams specifically stated " Adams conceded, however, that if the assault "was not so severe as to endanger their lives ,this was a provocation, for which the law reduces the offense of killing down to manslaughter." This supports my verdict as voluntary manslaughter, they should be punished according to the punishment.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    john adams

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4) John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain when they came to trial. He was informed that no one else would take the case, but he accepted regardless what judgment he would soon be getting. He said that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial, and convinced, on principle, that the case was of utmost importance. He put law above his personal beliefs and knew it was his duty to accept the case. Eventually, his fellow patriots came to respect him for what he had done.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Life of John Adams

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1770 Adams agreed to represent the British soldiers on trial for killing five civilians in what became known as the Boston Massacre. He justified defending the soldiers on the grounds that the facts of a…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay On Boston Bombing

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    ..BOSTON (AP) — Two bombs exploded in the crowded streets near the finish line of the Boston Marathon on Monday, killing at least three people and injuring more than 140 in a bloody scene of shattered glass and severed limbs that raised alarms that terrorists might have struck again in the U.S.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Massacres, genocides, holocaust what do these three things have in common? They are all deemed inhumane, immoral, and horrifying by American cultures. So, if this is a shared opinion how could American soldiers, generals, and sergeants br the main assailants of these acts of horror? Many acclaimed they were only following orders. But, this was more than a mission against the Viet Cong, this was hatred, frustration, anguish. If the soldiers were just doing as they were told, even if they’re enemy was all of the villagers in total, what type of training is given to incoming solider on how to scalping individuals, cut off hands and feet as well as raping women as young as 14 years old? What type of protocol is given when your enemy is a child…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Boston Massacre was one of the first massacres in the establish settlements. There is a question that long awaits an answer. Who started it all? Was it the soldier or was it the kids? I believe that the soldiers started it all. He shouldn’t have been swinging a sword around, they started shooting at innocent people, didn’t need guns to fix the problem. It all started with a drunk soldier.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays