Preview

John Adams Boston Massacre Trial

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
207 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Adams Boston Massacre Trial
Boston Massacre Trial John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The speaker of the series was named Brock Wagner. He is the CEO of the craft brewery located in the city of Houston in the section of town called Fifth Ward. Brock Wagner spoke of the path his life had taken and how it lead to him wishing to quit his investment banking job to start the Samuel Adams Brewery with the help of friends and family. The craft brewery landscape in the days that Samuel Adams was started in the mid 90’s was very different than what is like today to sell craft beer in Texas. Laws and regulations existed that prohibited the sale of beer or food at local brewery installations the state. Grass roots organizing and leadership in the Houston community lead to the passing and changing of laws that has made St. Arnolds the go to destination for craft beer that it is today. The CEO Brock Wagner shared his journey of finding the right environment at the time that appealed to him for the site of his brewery.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmett Till Trial

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr headed the Montgomery Improvement Association. At a local Baptist church the role was to rally that night for freedom, attendees voted to continue the boycott until they were treated with the level of respect.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the episode Join or Die, everything starts at the point of the Boston Massacre, due to the Coercive Acts, and most of the hour is spent on debating and choosing sides in court. After the event occurs, John Adams is asked to represent the English guards in the Massachusetts court of law. After hearing their story, he decided that representing them would only be right and just to the law. The viewers do not get to see John Adams’ planning process in the case, other than accepting it, since it jumps directly to the court scene. Here, the people of Massachusetts proceed in saying that the commander of the English guards, Captain Preston, told his men to fire upon the crowd of civilians. Adams opposes this and provides facts and evidence that contradict every part of the civilian argument, which is how he earns acquittal for the case against the guards. Later, Adams is offered a prominent position in the name of the King, but turns it down, which results in his appointment to the Continental Congress. This is where the episode ends, with Adams leaving his family and riding off to join the Congress.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the History Court’s trial of John Brown, the jury found him to be guilty. John Brown was deemed guilty of being morally unjustified for an insurrection. This insurrection was the killing of several slave owners and their families, and the starting of a slave uprising. The Prosecution made several key points. Their first witness, William Wilberforce, was able to nonviolently stop the slave trade in Britain. Through his use of nonviolence, many people followed him. William stated that it was worth it, although it may have taken longer than if he had used violence. He said that if the process had been faster, people would’ve had to die. The Prosecution’s second witness, Levi Coffin, was an abolitionist and the president of the Underground…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story "John Adams and the Coming of the Revolution”, author David McCullough discusses how John Adams was asked to defend the British soldiers in court of the soldier’s accusation of man slaughter, following the Boston Massacre. Being such a problematic case that could ruin his reputation, John Adams accepted to defend the soldiers because of his experience in difficult cases, and his strong principles and beliefs. John Adam’s reputation did not even tarnish because of how skillfully he handled the case gaining the respect of the people of Boston.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was a man who believed in the law, and in fair play. If the soldiers could not get a fair trial, were we any better than the British and their high handed ways.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the film, “The Trial of Aaron Burr:Part I” parts of the goverenment were questioned. To start off, the Authority of the Judical Branch. Towards the end of the trial, Hay, questionned the authority of the court. He stated that he was not in denial about Burrs right to request a witness, however, he was questioning the courts authority of the writ that has been requested. After a short brawl, Wickham was asked the question of weither the court has the authority to subpeona the president. He spoke and expressed that the president is not excempt from the laws.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Scopes Trial Essay

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were several people involved in the trial. They included John Scopes, William Jennings Bryan, and Clarence Darrow. They each played a very important role in the trial.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the key players in the George Zimmerman murder trial wasn't a witness or crime-scene photo, but something anyone interested in the case had equal access to, social media. Before during and after the trial, social media sites such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube were used by family members, supporters, media and lawyers of Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard of the “Salem witch trials”? Arthur Miller’s story “The Crucible” takes place in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. One of the many main characters Samuel Parris’ daughter, Betty is inert after dancing in the woods with a family servant by the name of Tituba. Parris tries to get the truth out of his other niece, Abigail to see whether or not they are guilty in witchcraft. Meanwhile, Abigail Adams story “Letters to John Adams” consists of two letters written to her husband, John Adams. These letters focus on Abigail addressing many things to her husband; however, one of them is women need the same treatment men have. Society made women feel less of themselves whereas religion says women must do as the husband says. Religion…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Thomas Robinson Trial

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most controversial issue in this story is probably the Thomas Robinson trial. The entire town of Maycomb was involved in this trial, and each took sides. I am certain that Thomas was innocent because all of the evidence pointed back to the “victim” and her father. I am 100% certain that Thomas is innocent because the bruises on the victim, 19-year-old Mayella Ewell, could only have been caused by a left-handed person. Thomas, however, lost all mobility in his whole left arm after a cotton gin accident as a child resulted in his entire left arm to be crippled.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tom Robinson Trial

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, racism is the belief that some races of people are better than others. In the American classic, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, racism is evident all throughout the book taking place in the south during the 1930’s, a time when racial injustices and discrimination was turbulent in America. Harper Lee weaves the truth of racism through the eyes of a young, innocent child looking at the differences in society.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays