Preview

Professor Johnson's Death Penalty E0: The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
409 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Professor Johnson's Death Penalty E0: The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States
4. Professor Johnson's death penalty IBE-
E0- The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution asserts that states do possess the ability to deny a person their life, if the due process of law is followed. The due process clause.

E1- The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution also asserts that all US citizens, born or naturalized, shall have equal protection of the law. The equal protection clause.

E2- The 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution asserts that no United States citizen shall endure cruel or unusual punishment as administered by the state.

E3- The founders believed that capital punishment, and the death penalty specifically, is constitutional and should be allowed, so long as the due process
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. Disgrazia Case Study
    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. Disgrazia Case Study

    Notably the Fourteenth Amendment contains important information that applies to all American citizens, and certain privileges the government certifies to individuals. The Fourteenth Amendment has many sections, but in Mr. Disgrazia case his Due Process was violated and the Equal Protection clause as well. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees a person the right to counsel. Mr. Disgrazia did not have the opportunity, and was charge and convicted. The Due Process Clause ensures every individual is given a fair trail, and their liberty is not taken away. The right to privacy is important as mention before and Mr. Disgrazia is…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The Constitution By Anthony Scalia
    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The Constitution By Anthony Scalia

    A third disputation of those who advocate capital punishment is that “it does not violate the US constitution.” One of these is Antonin Gregory Scalia, who was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 to 2016. In the article, “The Death Penalty Does Not Violate the US Constitution”, Scalia mentioned the Fifth and Eight Amendment to reject viewpoints of opponents who boycott capital punishment. The Fifth Amendment declares that “[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital … crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury … nor be deprived of life … without due process of law.” The Eight Amendment also bans the federal government from using cruel and unusual punishment. Scalia firmly proclaimed…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A constitution written in the 18th century does not work in the 21st century. Discuss with reference to the USA.
    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A constitution written in the 18th century does not work in the 21st century. Discuss with reference to the USA.

    There are a number of issues with America’s constitution which make it, arguably, unfit for the 21st century. The most apparent issue with the constitution is the overall ambiguity that it’s based upon. Take for example the eighth amendment which forbids the federal government from imposing cruel or unusual punishments on American citizens. However, what’s classed as a cruel or unusual punishment? Many have argued that capital punishment can be seen as a cruel punishment, which has led to some states, such as Illinois, abolishing the death penalty altogether. Though, despite eighteen states abolishing the death penalty so far, there has been no move to amend the constitution to include the death penalty as an example of ‘cruel punishment’.…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between 14th Amendment And Due Process
    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between 14th Amendment And Due Process

    Due process is a concept that dates back all the way to the early 13th century, when the Magna Carta was signed by King John. Due process of law is the principle that a person cannot be deprived of their right to life, liberty, and property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. It is first found in our constitution in the 5th amendment, and then it is once again stated in the 14th amendment. Due process is the only principle that is repeated in the constitution. (The Constitution states only one command twice.) There is little difference between what is said in the 5th and 14th amendment, but the one word that was added has had a monumental impact on our nation. The addition of the word “state” in the 14th amendment means that…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Are The Three Clauses Of The 14th Amendment
    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Are The Three Clauses Of The 14th Amendment

    In order to understand the cases that brought about the drastic change in the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, the three clauses of the 14th Amendment must be understood. These clauses help define what it means to be a U.S. citizen. The privileges or immunities clause was first written in Article IV section two. It was then written again in the 14th Amendment after slavery was abolished in order for equal protection guarantee. The federal government wanted to insure that states respected the rights and freedoms of former slaves. In the first section of the 14th Amendment it states, “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United states.” This clause was written so that…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civics and Economics, the 14th Amendment
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civics and Economics, the 14th Amendment

    Its obvious that we need the 14th amendment because a simple reason ; Equality. The 14th amendment is basically allowing everyone that is different then a what is considered to be a regular person and white man. Even though we have this we are still seen differently by some people but this amendment allows us to take action when they see us differently and try to do something about us. But to fully look into this situation we need to look at statistics. Lets look at the court case of Miranda v. Arizona first, in this court case it was decided that Miranda was treated unfairly under his 14th amendment. He confessed to a crime he had done without knowing that he was available to have a lawyer present while being questioned. He was therefore released under the court ruling that the due process clause of the 14th amendment had been violated because he was not told like he was supposed to that he has the right to remain silent, to have an attorney present, and, if the suspect cannot afford an attorney, to have one appointed by the state. He was later retried though without the confession and convicted. But clearly this is shown that those less educated on their rights and those different can still receive the equality they deserve and the information they need. But this also shows that our justice system is still able to punish everyone that needs to be…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution: The Citizenship Clause
    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing The Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution: The Citizenship Clause

    The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution contains the Citizenship Clause, the Due Process Clause, and the Equal Protection Clause. The Citizenship Clause maintains the citizenship of individuals who were born or naturalized in the United States. The Due Process Clause maintains that a state is prohibited from denying an individual of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Equal Protection Clause prohibits a state from denying an individual “within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” As it seeks to safeguard the liberties of citizens, the Fourteenth Amendment has been utilized to prevent discrimination against individuals based upon gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, etc. since…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between Cruel And Unsual Punshiment
    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Cruel And Unsual Punshiment

    Cruel and unsual punshiment is the eighth Amendment to the Counstitution of the United States. Anyone that has convicted of a crime have the right to be free of Curel and unsual during the time of jail or even prison. The eighth Amendment is almost the same as part of the 1689 English Bill of Rights. The amendment was written in because of a man named Titus Oastes lied and hurt many innocent people because of it. James Madison also know as “Father of the Constitution” wrote this amendment in 1789 the amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Lawrence Vs Texas
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Lawrence Vs Texas

    The fourteenth amendment was the amendment that had the greatest impact on individual rights, with its sole purpose to unite the union and provide equality of the nation. This amendment granted and guaranteed equal protection under constitutional law, and gave a sense of hope. It was to defend an individual no matter their race, religion, sexual orientation, and social status; and have the same…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cruel And Unusual Punishment Clause Of The Eighth Amendment
    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Cruel And Unusual Punishment Clause Of The Eighth Amendment

    The “Cruel and Unusual Punishment” Clause of the Eighth Amendment came from the English Bill of Rights that were adopted in 1689. This provision was written into the English Bill of Rights after Titus Otis, who lied causing many innocent people to be executed, was punished in a cruel and unusual way at the time. George Manson first used the cruel and unusual punishment clause in 1776 when he drafted the Declaration of Rights for the Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1791, the clause was added to the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. People feared that if this clause was not added that Congress would abuse its power and use cruel and unusual punishments as a tool to oppress them.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    2.8 Us Constitution Research Paper
    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2.8 Us Constitution Research Paper

    The fourteenth amendment in the constitution states that all people born in the United States have the same rights as every other person. No person should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. In other words, every person is free to live our life under certain simple-to-follow laws and if a person refuses follow these law that person could be deprived of liberty. It also states that not one person is above the law, every person is equal and will receive the same punishment as anyone who would of done by going to court where the judge and jury either determines them guilty or not guilty.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8th amendment
    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8th amendment

    The Eighth Amendment: It prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment. In the case of Atkins v. Virginia, the facts brought to the court was that the defendant, Daryl Atkins was tried for capital murder and sentenced to death for the shooting of a victim named Eric Nesbitt. Atkins had been smoking and drinking all day before he decided to walk to a convenient store and hold Nesbitt at gun point, upon Daryl’s dissatisfaction with the money he took, he kidnaped Nesbitt, taking him to an ATM to with drawl 200 dollars, along with a friend named William Jones, in Nesbitt’s car. When Daryl was satisfied with the money taken, he further continued his violence by driving Nesbitt to an isolated area, forcing him out of the vehicle, and then shot Nesbitt eight times killing him.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rights Guaranteed to Criminal Defendants
    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rights Guaranteed to Criminal Defendants

    Criminal defendants have several constitutional clauses that protect defendants from excessively severe or uncommon punishments. Most of these restrictions can be found in the Eighth Amendment. The Eighth Amendment states that in a criminal case, “excessive bail shall not be required”, “excessive fines shall not be imposed”, and “cruel and unusual punishment shall not be inflicted”. This is important because it restricts the court from issuing a punishment that is not fitting for the crime.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Capital Punishment Should Be Legalized Murder?
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Should Capital Punishment Should Be Legalized Murder?

    Cornell law states that "In 1976, the Supreme Court held that the mandatory death penalty violates the Eighth amendment to the Constitution." The Supreme Court believes that each state should be able to decide whether the death penalty should be allowed in their state boundaries. Even though the supreme court believes this the death penalty is a violation of the eighth amendment because it prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is cruel and unusual. Capital punishment is unusual because most developed countries in Western Europe have abolished the death penalty, but the United States continues to implement it. An example of how the death penalty is cruel is because in 2014 in the state of Arizona Joseph Wood was given a lethal injection it took him nearly two hours to die witnesses said that “he gasped and struggled to breathe for about 1 hour and 40 minutes.” In many cases people have gotten the wrong doses for the .However, most opponents could say that the person that was violated or murdered got their human right taken away, so they don't deserve human rights either. People should not get to pick and choose who deserves to live and die it is within every person's right to live no matter what the crime…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Abolition of Death Penalty
    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Abolition of Death Penalty

    First, the imposition of death penalty violates a person's right to live. Article III Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, otherwise known as the…

    • 2375 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics