Preview

Should Law Enforcement Have Access To Citizen's Digital Data Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Law Enforcement Have Access To Citizen's Digital Data Case Study
Should Law Enforcement Have Access to Citizen’s Digital Data? Law enforcement should have access to citizen’s digital data if they have a reasonable cause. There are many reasons to back up this claim, for example to keep the individuals and government of our country safe. Another reason would be to research someone that is a potential criminal or threat. Third, law enforcement may find something for evidence on the device that may not be found anywhere else. The argument has 2 very debatable sides, but in all reality, it is a good thing for law enforcement to have access when they need it. First of all, law enforcement may use the access to keep our country safe. People may try to use the internet and think nobody will see what they do, …show more content…
“Carpenter’s defense attorney Harold Gurewitz tried to get the lower courts to exclude information obtained from MetroPCS, arguing that the cell phone records could be seized only with a warrant supported by probable cause” (Greenemeir 1) This is an example of how a carrier will not give out your information without a proper cause. You can try and try all you want, but without a proper reason to search, you are wasting your time. Another thing is, your carrier gets your location because your device is constantly searching for the nearest cell phone tower to get the strongest connection possible. “To get a signal so it can make or receive a call, a cell phone establishes a radio connection with a nearby tower called a cell site. As the user moves, the device constantly scans for nearby towers for the strongest connection” (Greenemeir 1) This sends your location to your carrier constantly, so they know your location all the time. Without the warrant, police cannot get the access they need because they do not have the proper reason to track you. Your information is safe with your carrier until they have a reason to search your …show more content…
“The fourth amendment violates unreasonable seizures and searches” (Kopp 1). I think if you do not give law enforcement access to your information, you have something that you are hiding. Even if it isn’t anything to make you a criminal, you have something to hide. Even though you have the right to your privacy, most of the time, law enforcement doesn’t just want to search your data for no reason. If they really want to get the information and have the right reasons, they are going to get the access, whether you give it to them or not. “That interaction between cell sites and phones lets wireless carriers log and store details including a call’s time, date, and length” (Greenemeir 1). When they have the access and search your phone, they can look at literally everything they want in your phone, once access is approved. Therefore, if you gave them a reason to look into it in the first place, you might as well give them your consent to look through your information so they can find what they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first reason is the Revolutionary War, this was a disagreement between Great Britain and the American colonies. The king himself had created a swamp of new buildings and offices. Hitler swamped and took them out. This is showing the colonies were in need of general searches. The British officers were just trying to received taxed goods. The next reason is Carroll v United States 1925. The United States supreme court was doing warrantless searches through automobiles. This is taking it too far, the US supreme court should not be able to go through somebody's vehicle without a warrant. There is no reasonable suspicion, this is just too far. Allowing Farook's Iphone to be unlocked allowed him to set up a terror attack. He was able to send drivers to locations and set up an attack. Apple took it too far and a chance of unlocking his Iphone to do…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If someone told you “You are being watched every time you use digital communications, “how would you feel? The majority of people would probably feel discomfort. Sadly, you are being watched by the National Security Agency or NSA. While they allegedly keep us safe, the NSA shouldn't continue to monitor everyone’s digital communications. It gets every tax paying citizens money involved. They violate an amendment of the constitution. Likewise, there is a major loss of privacy. They simply have access to too much information. (Pathos)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 9 Final Paper

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the book military, security, taxes, police are greatly impacted by technology. The military use technology for combat stimulation and research. Security use technology to gather information and protect the system through the computer. For taxes, technology is used for calculation of bills and tax returns. Lastly the police use technology to search through records for important information. (de Arazoza, 2015)…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Riley v. California

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case Riley v California the court made the decision that the police must have a warrant in order to search cell phones, even in a case of arrest. If any data that is not in the warrant is obtained an officer must get rid of it. To obtain a warrant there must need to be an emergency or demanding circumstance. The court emphasized that the fact that cellphones now allows an individual to carry so much information in their hands does not makes it less valuable and still needs protection. This decision is now added to the fourth amendment and covers cellphone rights.…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Modern day society has a structure that relies on authority to thrive, without authority it becomes a house of cards, one falls over and the whole thing comes down. Governments need to keep people at bay therefore they create laws and systems that must be followed and if they are not, people face the consequences. People are controlled in a variety of ways, security cameras and traffic control cameras, reminds individuals that they are being watched. Internet Protocol address (IP address) is another way that anyone can use to locate an individual. License plates, a few numbers and letters that can give police an individual’s address and name.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Explain how the Internet has aided criminal activity. The internet has aided criminal activity by communicating with each other without having to be near, as well as fraud and identity theft. The rise of the Internet over the last decade has paralleled some of the greatest milestones in communications history. Along with such great strides in bringing the world together, the frightening aspect of accessing information and propaganda that tests the very limits of the U.S. Constitution has arrived. Above all, the Internet is used to commit against persons that include various crimes like transmission of child-pornography, harassment of any one with the use of a computer such as e-mail. The trafficking, distribution, posting, and dissemination of obscene material including pornography and indecent exposure, constitutes one of the most important criminal activity known today. With just a few keystrokes, an individual can have access to all forms of personal information, bomb-making instructions, and poison recipes; and a plethora of extremist ideologies expressing everything from radical religious cults to clandestine organized crime groups.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Digital Crime

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The National Security Agency (NSA) aims to use social media and improved data sharing as part of an enhanced strategy to fight organized crime in the United States and abroad. The White House has launched the Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized Crime to step up its efforts to fight this type of crime by better integrating diverse work from various agencies that collect intelligence data and track and investigate these types of criminals. The new plan is the result of a year-long study of the current state of these types of crimes, the most comprehensive of its kind in 15 years. The feds in general have been working across various agencies that are responsible for crime investigations and the protection of the general public--such as the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense--to better share information. Often agencies with different responsibilities for investigation don 't communicate effectively with each other, a problem the federal government has been trying to remedy through the use of technology.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obviously, if law enforcement is unaware of some of the methods criminals are using means that crime is going to go undetected and individuals will not be prosecuted. People are committing cybercrime from the comfort of their own home, so it’s not easy for law enforcement to recognize that crime is occurring compared to a person breaking the law in public. Nowadays, almost every home has devices such as a desktop, laptop, iPad, and/or iPhone that allow access to the Internet, which makes it difficult to catch cybercriminals. Some victims may not even know they were affected by cybercrime or may not report incidents to law enforcement. It’s important for law enforcement to know as much as possible regarding the usage of technology, software, and information to better detect any criminal activity (Maras, 2015). In order to prosecute, first comes detection. It is possible for law enforcement to establish the IP address from the computer that is committing cybercrime, but at the same time there could not be enough evidence to prosecute. Sometimes, criminals will alter their IP addresses to remain anonymous or use what are called proxy servers to prevent their IP addressed from being detected (Maras,…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment’s ultimate goal is the “provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions” (Legal Information). Therefore the Fourth Amendment gives everyone a right to their own privacy. Even though that it might seem like it would make it harder to gather information. The Fourth Amendment is "the right of the people to be secure in their persons.” In addition, the law enforcement only needs to be “supported by a probable cause” or an “arrest warrant,” to search a United States citizen. Although, the police officer could arrest a suspect to stop them from running away or to preserve evidence. Besides the Fourth Amendment is still beneficial for all United States…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According the Fourth Amendment, “protection applies only to situations where an individual has a subjective expectation of private that society willingly recognizes as reasonable” (Maras, 2015, p. 84). Thanks to the decision in the Katz v. United States case, the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test is used to established when law enforcement are allowed to conduct a search that does not violate one’s privacy (Maras, 2015). Information that is meant to be private and is contained in technology devices can be protected under the Fourth Amendment because the person’s intentions are to keep the information from the public (Maras, 2015). For example, in the Katz case there was a phone conversation that was admitted as evidence, but later found…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment provides the people of the United States, the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. Against unreasonable searches, and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized” (U.S Constitutional Amendments, 1972). The design of this Amendment is to create a type of barrier in order to protect individual rights to privacy, also preventing illegal search, and seizure of personal property. These search warrants are in…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    government tracking

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do you know who is tracking your movements when your turn on your cell phone, or what is being done with that information? These are questions that I recently had to ask myself after reading two insightful articles. The first was by Ronald Bailey called “Your Cellphone is Spying on You” and the other was by Terry J. Allen entitled “Reach Out and Track Someone”. In Ronald Bailey’s article, he explores the use of cellular phone tracking technology by law enforcement and their recent attempts to expand the surveillance laws to include more use of cell phones to track users’ movements without their knowledge. In addition he gives us some perspective on the idea of a big brother watching over us by examining what a future built on limited privacy expectations might look like. Allen gives us his personal perspective on tracking technology and explores abuses that might arise if we continue down the current path. Both of these articles have given me insight into the use of tracking technology and make me question both the moral and legal ramifications of sharing information related to personal movement. There is in fact a moral and legal balance that satisfies the need to protect the privacy of law abiding citizens, prosecute criminals, and protect family and friends through the use of cell phone tracking all at the same time, and the name we give to that solution is the constitution.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have a quote from the National Security Agency, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.” Resolve: The benefits of domestic surveillance by the NSA outweigh the harms. From Oxford dictionary, I have a definition of privacy: freedom from unauthorized intrusion. The 4th Amendment from the constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." According to Cornell University Law School, the 4th amendment “prohibits generalized searches, unless extraordinary circumstances place the general public in danger.”…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the law before search and seizure was added, the Fourth Amendment protected privacy of citizens completely and securely. The Fourth Amendment blocked out law enforcement completely. So, to have access to suspicions persons the government added Search and Seizure to the law. The problem with this is that some people get their privacy violated, and then later it is found out that they were not responsible for anything. Even though there are many risks, the amount of arrest of criminals far out way the risks of mistakes.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before federal agents take surveillance and seize phone calls or records from a person they must first have a good reason or evidence to do so. This follows the idea of probable cause listed above. Next, before agents can seize anything they must issue a warrant and have it approved. This way they can’t just see anybody’s information that they want to. Here is a quote from a heritage.org writer on the Patriot Act’s constitutionality. “ No single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional. This is a testament to the act’s limited applicability, procedural safeguards, and extensive oversight…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays