Preview

The Importance Of The Fourth Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
752 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of The Fourth Amendment
“The NSA is not listening to Americans' phone calls or monitoring their emails” (Does the Government). As the government states they are permitted to collect any Americans communications The Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, for instance the police cannot search personal properties. Due to the definition of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” it makes people feel secure (Legal Information). In addition, it prevents all irrelevant searches that are not useful. On the other hand the Fourth Amendment makes it challenging for law enforcement to gather information. The Fourth Amendment is beneficial to citizens: it protects privacy, makes people feel secure, and deters searches, although it makes amassing evidence more arduous for the law-enforcement community.
Due to having the Fourth Amendment in the United States, citizen’s privacy is protected. As the Fourth Amendment states "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” which protects United States citizen's privacy (Legal Information). Therefore, law enforcement could not invade a citizen’s house without a warrant or
…show more content…
The Fourth Amendment’s ultimate goal is the “provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions” (Legal Information). Therefore the Fourth Amendment gives everyone a right to their own privacy. Even though that it might seem like it would make it harder to gather information. The Fourth Amendment is "the right of the people to be secure in their persons.” In addition, the law enforcement only needs to be “supported by a probable cause” or an “arrest warrant,” to search a United States citizen. Although, the police officer could arrest a suspect to stop them from running away or to preserve evidence. Besides the Fourth Amendment is still beneficial for all United States

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I enjoy reading your post. I would say that one of the reasons the 4th Amendment is so important is that it is reflective of the Colonists' own experiences. The Colonists were outraged on many levels that British soldiers could enter their homes, seize their belongings, or search their property without any probable cause or authentic paperwork. The fact that warrant-less and groundless searches became so prevalent is one reason why the 4th Amendment strictly states that justification and authentication must accompany all searches and investigation of property and belongings. Another I would say that the 4th Amendment is important is that it represents a fundamental right of a person accused of wrongdoing in a legal sense. The 4th Amendment…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheetum Case Summary

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. U.S. Const. amend. IV…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 4th Amendment is a security blanket for those who were wrongfully suspected of being guilty. The Amendment states that one is safe in their own house, with their own property until the authority can provide a warrant. So where was the 4th Amendment when the Japanese were pushed out of their homes and into internment camps? The words of a man who experienced this atrocity first hand, George Takei, only further proves that the Japanese were denied this Amendment, “[American soldiers] stomped up the front porch and banged on the door. My father answered it, and the soldiers ordered us out of our home.” Pertaining to the 4th Amendment, the soldiers should have had a warrant, or at least an explanation to give to the family before telling them…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To start with, for someone to obtain a search warrant, the police would have to convince the judge that they have a probable cause. If someone commits a crime and the police need to access private information about a certain person, then the police have to make a clear and probable case to the judge and if the judge thinks they are a threat they will give the police that search warrant. Namely, the Fourth Amendment states “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, an effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” People have their privacy protected by many, they keep people and their belongings safe from people that danger you in many ways. The government has protected citizens everyday…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, I believe that the 4th amendment is both good and bad depending on the circumstances. Sometimes there are people who blatantly have drugs that the cops can't frisk off until they have the warrant. By the time the police get the warrant, said suspect could have already gotten rid of the drugs. However, this also works the other way. Sometimes, the police search other people that they have false evidence on. Then this innocent person gets searched and it makes the searched person look bad in the future.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment, or the Bill of Rights for that matter, is only applicable to the government and not private citizens. The exclusionary rule would not have any merits if a private citizen went into someone’s home and found evidence of a crime while searching it so long as the private…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my criminal justice classes, I learned that there are many amendments that protects citizens when they are arrested. After September 11, and the terrorist attacked, President Bush passed the Patriot Act. Many people were unhappy because it allows police officers and federal agents to invade our privacy. Many laws passed into effect and all the police departments started to share information with ICE, FBI and other federal agencies, nationwide and locally.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue-What is the basic legal question regarding the law that will be used in the case…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All citizens of The United States deserve their privacy, but in those emergency situations where you have to invade someone’s privacy for the greater good of others than that’s acceptable. The Fourth Amendment offers and important safeguard against unjustified government surveillance, all of us are granted that right when we are born in the United States.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In most cases, the government can not enter my dwelling without a warrant. The Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights to protect the American people from their own government. One specific amendment, the Fourth Amendment, requires the federal government to get a warrant, signed by a judge, stating the area being searched, the person they are searching, or what they are going to search. There have been various occasions where the Fourth Amendment’s been brought up in court. Some of them include with federal agencies, Supreme Court cases, corporations, and well-known people.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The government is invading this amendment by spying on the citizens without warrant. The government shouldn’t have the right to spy unless they have a probable cause to do so. People are aware that the government is spying on them through surveillance cameras, cell phones, and the internet.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects us citizens from the searching of our homes and private property without properly executed search warrants. If law enforcement wants to collect these records such as GPS tracking or cell phone tracking, they will need a search warrant based on probable cause. This constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment because it violates the individuals reasonable expectation of privacy. You would think that your location would be private and expect it to remain private, but that is not the case. When law enforcement seeks the cell phone location and this individual is inside his or her house, they cross the line by learning facts about the interior of the home, which is clearly illegal without a warrant. Let's say the…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have a quote from the National Security Agency, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.” Resolve: The benefits of domestic surveillance by the NSA outweigh the harms. From Oxford dictionary, I have a definition of privacy: freedom from unauthorized intrusion. The 4th Amendment from the constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." According to Cornell University Law School, the 4th amendment “prohibits generalized searches, unless extraordinary circumstances place the general public in danger.”…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays