Preview

Benefits Of The Fourth Amendment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
188 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Benefits Of The Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment does not allow searches of personal items unless a warrant is used, but by tracking information on people it could help detect terrorism threats sooner. For example, President Obama claims that the data-collection programs “help prevent terrorism (Transcript: Obamas Remarks 4.3).” Even though people do not need a warrant to use these programs, people examine the phone numbers and length of calls, and by doing this it could ultimately protect the country from terrorism threats. Also, the U.S. Patriotism Act enables law enforcement agencies to search through “email and telephone communications, medical, financial, and library records (Legal Information Institute 1.1).” Furthermore, whenever the intelligence gathering community

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An influential government philosopher John Locke once stated, “Government has no other end , but the preservation of property.” The 4th amendment has an important part of protecting essential values. 4th amendment allows people to be secured in persons, houses, ext.Unless an issued search warrant ,probable cause or reasonable suspicion. For instance a precedent is Katz v Ohio this shows that the government can go too far with their search and seizure procedure.Today there are many cases in which the government is not using a search warrant when they are searching someone. Another reason is the writs of assistance case which established that the government does not take into consideration the 4th amendment for years the colonies got their ships searched and they were ran over by the government until the 4th amendment became a bill of right. How they established this case is they searched a ship for smuggled goods. I think that this is too far because they shouldn't be able to…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I enjoy reading your post. I would say that one of the reasons the 4th Amendment is so important is that it is reflective of the Colonists' own experiences. The Colonists were outraged on many levels that British soldiers could enter their homes, seize their belongings, or search their property without any probable cause or authentic paperwork. The fact that warrant-less and groundless searches became so prevalent is one reason why the 4th Amendment strictly states that justification and authentication must accompany all searches and investigation of property and belongings. Another I would say that the 4th Amendment is important is that it represents a fundamental right of a person accused of wrongdoing in a legal sense. The 4th Amendment…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 4th Amendment is a security blanket for those who were wrongfully suspected of being guilty. The Amendment states that one is safe in their own house, with their own property until the authority can provide a warrant. So where was the 4th Amendment when the Japanese were pushed out of their homes and into internment camps? The words of a man who experienced this atrocity first hand, George Takei, only further proves that the Japanese were denied this Amendment, “[American soldiers] stomped up the front porch and banged on the door. My father answered it, and the soldiers ordered us out of our home.” Pertaining to the 4th Amendment, the soldiers should have had a warrant, or at least an explanation to give to the family before telling them…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To start with, for someone to obtain a search warrant, the police would have to convince the judge that they have a probable cause. If someone commits a crime and the police need to access private information about a certain person, then the police have to make a clear and probable case to the judge and if the judge thinks they are a threat they will give the police that search warrant. Namely, the Fourth Amendment states “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, an effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” People have their privacy protected by many, they keep people and their belongings safe from people that danger you in many ways. The government has protected citizens everyday…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth amendment protects citizens of the United States from unlawful searches and seizures conducted by police officers or law enforcement agencies. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution affirms: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”The fourth amendment protects searches that happens when a government official contravene with one's expectation of privacy. Another thing that the fourth amendment protects are seizures’. For a seizure police would conduct communication to a reasonable person. Terry v. Ohio case first took place on…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in the beginning stages of the War on Terrorism, President Bush enacted the Patriot Act. This allowed the government to spy on citizens, monitoring their activities in order to discern whether or not someone is a terrorist. It brought about changes in law enforcement that allowed agencies to search phones, financial records, etc.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, I believe that the 4th amendment is both good and bad depending on the circumstances. Sometimes there are people who blatantly have drugs that the cops can't frisk off until they have the warrant. By the time the police get the warrant, said suspect could have already gotten rid of the drugs. However, this also works the other way. Sometimes, the police search other people that they have false evidence on. Then this innocent person gets searched and it makes the searched person look bad in the future.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 5th Amendment states that the government must follow the due process of the law before punishing a person and that all citizens had the right to a trial by jury. It also states that a person cannot be put on trial twice for the same crime or that person on trial for a crime does not have to testify against themselves in court - "Pleading the 5th". The reason for this addition to the Constitution was due to the British refusing to grant the same rights to American subjects as they gave to people in Great Britain. Many people were jailed without even being accused of a crime. This specifically referred to the right of a Trial by Jury and the right not incriminate themselves. The 5th Amendment is also referred to as the Double Jeopardy and…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government official does not have the right to go on the man’s property without a warrant. In 4th Amendment, it specifically says “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue” it means that a government official can not go on your property, car or phone without probable cause.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my criminal justice classes, I learned that there are many amendments that protects citizens when they are arrested. After September 11, and the terrorist attacked, President Bush passed the Patriot Act. Many people were unhappy because it allows police officers and federal agents to invade our privacy. Many laws passed into effect and all the police departments started to share information with ICE, FBI and other federal agencies, nationwide and locally.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people, without even knowing it, are frequently protected, or using, the Bill of Rights in their everyday lives. The amendments that affect my life the most are the 1st, 4th, and 9th where as the 7th, 6th, and 5th are not as relevant. The first amendment protects my freedoms of expression; religion, assembly, petition, press, and speech. The most used freedom of expression in my life is freedom of speech, the right to express my opinion in a peaceful way. Being able to say what I believe about the government, ways of life, causes I support, and other beliefs I disagree with is all defended by the 1st amendment. The 4th amendment is also very relevant in my life. The 4th amendment allows me to be safe and secure in my houses, persons, papers,…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Hudson, 2010, p.363). In this essay we will explore what is reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment. A discussion of consensual encounters vs. detentions concerning search and seizure, we will also discus important cases that shape the fundamentals procedures of search and seizure.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The negative consequences of the change may come in the form of Fourth Amendment challenges, and the idea that law enforcement is invading a person’s privacy, which is also protected by the Constitution, but do to the Patriot Act, this has allowed the government and criminal justice agencies to pry into a person’s business and life without consequence. Another negative aspect is the possibility that information can be abused, and according to the IACP “abuse can happen if such operations are not properly organized, focused, and directed” (2003).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within the granting of access to information, persons, and resources, the Patriot Act has also enhanced the abilities and rights of law enforcement, the courts, and the government at large. Now, more than ever, law enforcement, the courts and the government can intervene in every part of your life, from observing your activities through extensive surveillance techniques to monitoring your library-reading list to ensure political loyalties are properly aligned.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays