Preview

Search and Seizure

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
320 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Search and Seizure
Search and Seizure
I believe that search and seizure is very important for our country and our rights. Search and Seizure helps to protect our fourth amendment right, which is the right to privacy. The Search and seizure says that law enforcement cannot search or put anyone under arrest unless they have evidence to support that action (Murray). I believe that search and seizure is important to protecting our privacy rights. If police so not have any evidence against you, that they can’t search you, your car your house or anything. In the law before search and seizure was added, the Fourth Amendment protected privacy of citizens completely and securely. The Fourth Amendment blocked out law enforcement completely. So, to have access to suspicions persons the government added Search and Seizure to the law. The problem with this is that some people get their privacy violated, and then later it is found out that they were not responsible for anything. Even though there are many risks, the amount of arrest of criminals far out way the risks of mistakes. This amendment is very important to many peoples in the United States of America. This amendment is of such importance that the view of this amendment of a candidate for elected office can alter the view and choices of a potential voter (Babbin). This is a very great amendment that I believe helps to keep the public of the United States if America safe. Search and Seizure allows the Law Enforcement to bypass our rights to privacy. Although there are many form and opinions as to the extent of Search and Seizure, I believe that any form of opinion could potentially help to protect our citizens from criminals and themselves. I personally like Search and Seizure, as long as it isn’t abused by our government to an extent that people’s privacy is being violated because of false evidence.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    violation of DLK’s rights because they did not go in the house. They used a thermal imager yes…

    • 504 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weeks Vs United States

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

     Practical: Arguments  Weeks’ view: The 4th Amendment states that people are safe from unreasonable and searches without a warranty. And any evidence obtained from illegal an search is illegal. Federal officials should not be able to break the law in order to enforce the law.  United States’ view: An arrest was made in connection with a search, and further searches produced further evidence of illegal activity.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To start with, for someone to obtain a search warrant, the police would have to convince the judge that they have a probable cause. If someone commits a crime and the police need to access private information about a certain person, then the police have to make a clear and probable case to the judge and if the judge thinks they are a threat they will give the police that search warrant. Namely, the Fourth Amendment states “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, an effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” People have their privacy protected by many, they keep people and their belongings safe from people that danger you in many ways. The government has protected citizens everyday…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A search occurs when an expectation of privacy that society considers reasonable is infringed by a governmental employee or by an agent of the government. Private individuals who are not acting in either capacity are exempt from the Fourth Amendment prohibitions. A seizure refers to the interference with an individual 's possessory interest in property. To meet the definition of an unreasonable seizure, the property 's owner must have had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the items seized. A person is seized when law enforcement personnel use physical force to restrain the person if a reasonable person in the same or a similar situation would not feel free to leave the situation. The previous owner of abandoned property cannot allege an unreasonable seizure of that abandoned property. Abandoned property is property left behind by its owner in a manner in which the owner abandons the possessory interest in the property and no longer retains a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to the search (Law School, 2013).…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • a search of a student by a teacher or other school official will be "justifie…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    stop which she did have reason to do. For a traffic stop you really don’t need all…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Search Case

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was adopted as a response to the abuse of search warrants in the American Revolution. The debate of the definition of search has been challenged in many cases in the history of the United States and is brought up again in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that a search occurs only when a person expects privacy in the thing search and society beliefves that expectation is reasonable. This was decided in Katz v. United States in 1967. In Katz the Court ruled that a search had occurred when the government wiretapped a telephone booth. Now seizure is the other part of the 4th amendment. A Seizure of propert occurs when there is meaningful interference by the government with an individual's possessory interests. The exclusionary rule also falls under seizure. The exclusionary rule states that voluntary answers to questions given to officers are offered into evidence in a ciminal prosecution. The government may not detain and individual even momentarily without reasonable, objective grounds, with few exceptions. The refusal to listen or answers does not answer these grounds. The invasion on people's privacy is only minimal and is usually only in speical cases. Some of these…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is the most prolific source of constitutional litigation in American history, particularly with application to the states after its incorporation through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. All the arrest that are made has to do with the fourth amendment, so that is something that has a big part in the arrests being made. Every search or seizures that are made by teachers, probation officers, police, airport security, or even a crossing guard are dealing with the fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment is the constitutional sentry whenever someone's privacy is diminished by a governmental search or seizure. This protects them unless there is a reasonable suspicion or if there is a warrant. The Court declares,…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Search warrants are a major part of most investigations that take place everywhere in our country. What is a search warrant? It is basically a court order that is issued by a judge or any other type of Supreme Court official that authorizes law enforcement personnel, in most cases police officers, to conduct a search of a person, house, vehicle, or any other type of location. Evidence of a crime is what is mostly being searched for. Authorities will most often confiscate the evidence or objects of the crime.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    First let me start off by saying that, after reading the account of what happened to Trixee, in my opinion Trixee has a VALID argument that both Officer Fletcher and manager violated her fourth amendment rights against “search and seizure” as well as her constitutional rights. I will now explain my opinion by clarifying the Issues of fourth amendment violation by ShowTime and Officer Fletcher, the rules (laws) that were violated, a brief Analysis of proof that they were in violation of fourth amendment laws, and finally how this all leads top my conclusion that Trixee has a strong case against Officer Fletcher and Showtime Gentleman’s Club for violating her fourth amendment right against “search and seizure” and privacy. But before discussing these four points I will define some legal terms that affect this case so that we have a better understanding of the issues involved and why I came to my conclusion.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    US Constitution 1

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment requires legal authorities to obtain a search warrant before conducting a search of a person's possessions. Bill of Rights • • • • V. Rights in criminal cases The Fifth Amendment says that no one can be tried for a federal crime unless he or she is indicted by a grand jury, a group of citizens who decided whether there is sufficient evidence to put the person on trial. The amendment also states that a person cannot be tried twice for the same offense (unless the jury fails to reach a verdict). The amendment guarantees that individuals cannot be required to testify against themselves and cannot be deprived of "life liberty or property, without due process of law."…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Search Warrant

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In some cases, one of the things that people do is to dispose of incriminatory objects, documents or things related to drug use, they often believe that evidence will not be found or do not take into account if there is a law enforcer who may take advantage of the situation. People are not aware that the law can use garbage obtain a search warrant for your home or vehicle without it being a search under the 4th amendment, especially in drug related crimes, most of the people think that they need a search warrant in order to register any part of their property, but the law considers garbage as an abandoned property in some instances and doesn’t believe that you should expect privacy in those cases, whether or not the garbage is protected from police searches without a warrant, relies on the decision of the court regardless of where was the garbage located in the property, when your garbage cans are actually put in the curb of your property, the court considers it to be abandoned property since any person can have access to it, but it your garbage is within the curtilage of your house the police will need a warrant in order to search it.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Every citizen has the right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion into his or her person, home, business, and property. Lawmakers and the courts have put in place legal safeguards to ensure that law enforcement officers conduct searches and seizures only under certain circumstances, and through specific methods.…

    • 2744 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    - human rights and protection to their property and themselves against the search warrant without evidence against them except to prove that when probable cause to determine personally the judge after examination under oath or affirmation the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be taken.…

    • 2333 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays