Preview

Sharecropping After The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sharecropping After The Civil War
In the 1960s, after the abolishment of slavery with the 13th amendment, slaves were free to live their lives as they so chose. Freed slaves and others in the south after the civil war needed to find a new way of living. Slaves were not paid for their labor, however, they were given food and shelter by their owner. Freed slaves had to figure out how to get those necessities on their own. Since slaves were used to working with crops, they looked to sharecropping as their means of work.
Sharecropping is a system where a freedman would grow crops on someone else’s land and the farmer would give a portion of the crops to the owner as payment. It seemed like a reasonable way for everyone in the south to be profitable. Freed slaves would use their skills to make money, while landowners use some of the crops to make money without working. Unfortunately, the system had its faults.
Some freed slaves found themselves negotiating with the same people who used to owned them. This also meant they had to focus on growing cotton. Sharecropping resembled slavery. Also, many of those involved faced debt. Owners ended up working on the farm themselves. Many lost their land too.
This is a key part of the 1860s, because America realized that a serious plan for reconstruction after the civil war was needed. People in the south in-particular needed help
…show more content…
It was tough finding a job due to an increase in immigration and employee discrimination. People like Terrence Powderly recognized these issues. He funded the Knights of Labor. This was a labor union that included a broad range of workers. People within the union didn’t have to be masters in their line of work. Also, many underrepresented workers like women and African-Americans were a part of this group. The only demographic that wasn’t affiliated with the union was Chinese immigrants. This was considered to be an independent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: The Lakeside Packers case demonstrates that the province of Alberta requires the Labour Code to be amended to allow for First Contract Arbitration in the Collective Bargaining Process.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecrop Contract

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sharecrop Contracts of the 1882 was a contract that seemed to be for the landowners and not for the actual sharecropper. The landowners seem to not really take care of the sharecroppers in any way. The landowner’s responsibilities seem to only be to supply the land or more like renting it and reaping the profits of the share croppers in order to keep them in debt to the landowners and never actually freeing them to own their own land and freedom actually keeping them not, as slaves, but still getting the benefits of slavery. The landowners agreed to supply 30 to 35 acres and furnish them, or basically rent them, a team of horses, a plow, and farming implements. Landowners insisted that the sharecroppers give them half of their crops no questions ask or at least make up for half of the fodder even if the sharecroppers crops failed for any reason. The sharecroppers wasn’t even supposed to be concerned with where the seed to the cotton or corn went or even know how much product they produced, the Landowner kept it housed and took it to the market and sold it and the sharecropper had to just trust that they was being honest in giving them what was left after the Landowner took out all the expenses and deductions. The landowners also made it where the sharecroppers could not plant any produce at their place of living if so the Landowner received a portion of it.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Slaves on the other hand was forced to work, threatened of physical punishment, and little freedom. Slaves were bought and sold like…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecroppers are people that own land and offered shares of the crop instead of wages in return for labor. Sharecropping prevented the freedmen from becoming independent landowners because the former slaves were unable to own land and became dependent on the white landowners for food.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slaves could purchase their own food, clothing, and other essentials and some Slave Masters found it harder to control their Slaves due to the Slaves being able to provide for themselves. "Term Slavery" Slaves were not 100% free, but being able to take care of themselves only fueled their desire to become free Slaves. Industrial slavery overlapped with urban slavery, but southern industries that employed slaves were often in rural areas. By 1860 about 5 percent of southern slaves—approximately 200,000 people worked in industry. Enslaved men, women, and children worked in textile mills in South Carolina and Georgia, sometimes beside white people (Hine, Hine, and Harrold). The Slaves earned their ability to be free through paying a certain amount of monies and/or work…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The IWW was a much different union then seen in previous years. IWW believed that most trade unions during it’s promoted same industry worker competition. To be specific, this ultimately would lead worker competition especially seen in terms of wages. In the 1900’s there where multiple different unions; each of which was usually divided by race, gender, or skill. The IWW (Industrial workers of the world) sought a very different type of union apart from trade or craft. For the first time a union truly wanted to organize all the workers from any given union into one big union, regardless of race, gender, or skill. This was a bold idea considering race and gender discrimination was…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many African Americans wanted to grow their own crops, so General Sherman promised property to them, in 1865. There was a strip of land in Charleston that was held for African American settlement and each family was allowed 40 acres. Many former slaves desired to work for wages on the plantations of the loyal owners or Northern leaseholders. Africans Americans started to establish their own schools, churches and places in politics. President Johnson gave the former Confederates back their land, this included some of the land Sherman had promised to the African Americans. Many African American families settled on their promised land and argued that it should be theirs after working on it for so many years. Even through the families pleads, the Congress refused to concede upon the matter. The Freedman’s Bureau composed fair contracts between the land owners and the African American labor force. (MAPAH) Since the former slaves did not want to fall back into slave actions they did not work women or children, worked shorter hours and looked for the best terms. Families would cultivate pieces of land and divide the produce with the landowners, the better working conditions the landowner gave them, the better produce they would receive. The control from Republicans and African American public officials did not let the former Confederates to treat the workers as…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecroppers were people who agreed to maintain a person's crops in return for food and shelter. As a result of the boll weevil eating the crops, african americans did not get the return of food and shelter and most of them lost their jobs. For this reason is why hey had to migrate north. Even though there…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the civil war drew to an end, the movement to abolish slavery became more and more realistic. As of January 1, 1863, all slaves living in the Confederate South were to ‘be then, thenceforward, and forever free’” (Schroeder quoting Abraham Lincoln The Emancipation Proclamation.) This new law put many newly freed slaves in a tight spot. Even though they were allowed to leave the plantations and homes in which they had worked, they had nowhere to go and no money to get anywhere. None of them had any jobs any longer, and did not have the means to provide themselves and their families with food which was previously given to them by their masters. A few of the slaves even made arrangements with their masters to stay at the plantation, but work…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This led to the sharecropping system. The freed slaves could rent some land to farm. Payment was a portion of their crops at the end of the year. While this sounds good, it was not always good. Land owners would sometimes be cruel and cheat the freedmen out of crops. It sometimes kept the slaves on the same plantation that they were enslaved on. Making them feel as though nothing had really changed. Some men however, chose to enlist in the army during the Civil War. Many of the men did not return, leaving their wives to care for the family. The government gave pensions to deceased soldiers wives. However, slave marriages were not recognized as legal marriages. These women had to work hard to prove that they had been in a marriage of sorts with the soldier. Sometimes they could not give them enough evidence and could not receive a pension. This made it difficult for some women to provide for their…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    America, like any other nation, has always relied heavily on agriculture. Differing from other nations, however, is the problems that agriculture has created through America's short history. It can be argued that the Civil War was started by agriculture; the South developed as an agricultural dependent region, while the North developed as a industrial region; creating two distinct, almost separate cultures. Some twenty years after the Civil War, new problems were arising; that of agrarian discontent. Farmers of the 1880s and 90s were having a harder and harder time getting by. There was no showing of care ; through the drafts. But the farmers placed the blame of their problems on two main areas; the money supply, and the railroads.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Populism In The 1890s

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The blacks were free, but very few could own lands. The white masters had landed but lack power over labor. To keep their ex-slaves, they came up with sharecropping. In this case, the black was given lands to rent and payback in the form of production share to the landowners. In this scheme, it was of importance to the landowners since almost all the Blacks wanted to tenant farmers while they were politically weak and economically unstable hence the landowners dictated them as demonstrated by Zieger.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning, many slaves had a tough time being free. Being a slave was all that they knew, and “freedom” would become a big adjustment, especially when your mind is stilled enslaved. These former slaves had no home, no jobs and they could not read and write. Unfortunately, the only skill that they knew was farming or domestic work. Some former slaves went back to what was familiar, the plantation and plantations owners. Others received assistance from the Freedom Bureau. This Bureau provided them with food, medical care and helped to find them places to live and work. Those blacks that lived in the South enjoyed their freedom for a few years. Their brief period of freedom, they owned their own homes, and they were even voting…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays