Preview

Call Me Mister Questions 2 and 6

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Call Me Mister Questions 2 and 6
2) Former slaves did many things in order to shed their slave status. This included taking on new names to denote their status, such as “Freeman” or “Freedman,” or just simply dropping their slave names. Others settled on the names of their masters or the names they had when they were separated from their family. Not only was their name important, land ownership was also very important. The former slaves needed to own land to achieve true independence because the promise of self-sufficiency, independence, and opportunity rested in ownership of land. They believed that by being self-sufficient, something that wouldn’t be possible without land, they would achieve true independence. If they weren’t self-sufficient, they would still be dependent on others.

William Tecumseh Sherman met with black community leaders to discuss the issue of confiscated Confederate land in Georgia, South Carolina, and northern Florida while Andrew Johnson returned land to the original prewar owners and expelled former slaves living on and cultivating the land.

Sharecroppers are people that own land and offered shares of the crop instead of wages in return for labor. Sharecropping prevented the freedmen from becoming independent landowners because the former slaves were unable to own land and became dependent on the white landowners for food.

6) The compromise that settled the disputed presidential election of 1876 was the Compromise of 1877. The election was disputed because Rutherford B. Hayes had 165 votes while Tilden had 184, with 20 votes uncounted. These 20 votes were in contention in the states of Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. Hayes eventually won the vote after a long legal and political battle.

Authors contend that it “had been struck at African American expense” because the dispute occurred because of the votes of African Americans and the end result ended up actually taking away the voice of African Americans.

Poll taxes, literacy tests, and other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    While it does not seem like much effort if any was given to distribute the Confederates confiscated land among the heads of freedmen families, there were a few people who made a substantial effort. One of those people was General William T. Sherman who issued the Special Field Order Fifteen of 1865 which set “aside a large swath of land along the coast of South Carolina and Georgia for settlement by black families” (Foner 10). This was initially a success, and “thousands of acres were allotted to blacks; negro communities grew up; the government was carried on, churches and schools were established and roads made” (Fleming 726). In the few short months the freedmen had possession of the land, the community thrived, but that would change in a matter of less than a…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 1

    • 414 Words
    • 1 Page

    slaves a homestead and the means to enjoy a true American life. But, shown by the frustration of…

    • 414 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though it was true that an ex-slave could go from rags to riches, even with the most lavish paraphernalia, you could not acquire the same status as someone who was born into this lifestyle. A freedman's fortune could only get them so far when social hierarchy was concerned. Ex-slaves cannot hold high office positions. They were frequently treated poorly and abhorred by their social superiors. Others acted as if they were copying them or trying to be a part of something they're not. Having minor changes to your legal status was not uncommon, however true social mobility was often inaccessible. Be that as it may, it was quite possible that a descendant of a freed slave could hold high office.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment 1 AMH2020

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During reconstruction, the meaning of freedom suited many different types of interpretation; the perception of freedom between former slaves and their slaves masters were very contradictory. To begin with, African-Americans had suffered severe abuse over those years of slavery, so to them, the meaning of freedom was basically a hope that in the future, they won’t experience all kind of punishment and exploration that they have been experienced so far. Besides that, formers slaves were demanding equal civil and political rights. In the same way, they valued their freedom by establishing their own schools and churches, reuniting families that were separated under slavery and seeking financial dependence. Foner (2014) supports the same argument: “Blacks relished the opportunity to demonstrate their liberation from the regulation, significant and trivial, associated with slavery. They openly held mass meeting and religious services free of white supervision” (p. 557) . In addition, Foner (1014) also found “Former slaves’ ideas of freedom, like those of rural people throughout the world, were directly related to landownership” (p. 560) . On other hand, their slaves masters’ perception of freedom was different. For example, most Southerners reacted the emancipation with dismay, according to Foner (2014) , Southern leaders didn’t want to accept reality “Freedom still meant hierarchy and mastery; it was a privilege not a right, a carefully defined legal status rather than an open-ended entitlement” (p. 561) .…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Tilden won the popular vote by 250,000, the Republican candidate Rutherford Hayes won the majority vote from the electoral college. The conflict stemmed from the Republican and Democratic parties competing for dominance in Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina. Therefore, the electoral college had sent contradictory results and increased the rising tensions within the nation. However, true to his character Tilden came to a peaceful agreement, giving Hayes the presidency and Democrats control of the south. This Compromise of 1877 was designed to avoid conflict within the nation, but it ended the Reconstruction Era, consequentially preserving racism within the…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samuel J Tilden Essay

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unsurprisingly, the Commission granted Hayes the electoral votes, meaning that he had beaten Tilden by only one electoral vote. Tensions continued to rise, however, as many Democrats refused to accept the legitimacy of Hayes’s victory. In order to end the crisis and avert disorder, the “Compromise of 1877” was reached, in which Hayes’s legitimacy as President was accepted in exchange for the withdrawal of all federal troops from the South, ending the process of Reconstruction.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While initially successful, the moment that President Johnson confiscated the land given to us, the Freedmen, under Sherman's Field Order 15, Reconstruction failed. This land should have remained the rightful property of the Freedmen as a gesture of concession, validity of African American rights, and just punishment to white planters.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 10

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another reason was the Compromise of 1877.After the southerners made great changes affecting the lives of freed African Americans, restricting the right of freed slaves. Hayes got the 20 disputed electoral votes.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions 6

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The pharmaceutical industry plays a pivotal role in the health care system. Without the pharmaceutical industry, health care would not evolve into what it is today. The reason why it plays such an important role in health care is because it helps address challenges associated with modern day diseases and illnesses. It controls prevent, treat, and cure many types of diseases. In support, according to Williams and Torren, “ Biotechnology offers new approaches to discovery, design, and production of drugs and vaccines, and diagnostics.”…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became a new of form of slavery in the South. Many problems emerged from sharecropping. Freedmen were forced into an unending cycle of debt. They had no money to buy tools or seeds, which caused them to borrow supplies from the landowners. The plantation owners got to pick how much they charged for the supplies and what crops they would plant. This took away their economic freedom, freedmen were no longer allowed to decide what they produced to make money. The plantation owners had control over their lives because they owed them money. They influenced their decisions and limited their ability to participate in society. If the plantation owner told them that they could not vote, then they would not. This shows how their lack of economic freedom contributed to the loss of their political freedom. Therefore, this proves that It is not possible to be politically free if you are not economically…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many African Americans wanted to grow their own crops, so General Sherman promised property to them, in 1865. There was a strip of land in Charleston that was held for African American settlement and each family was allowed 40 acres. Many former slaves desired to work for wages on the plantations of the loyal owners or Northern leaseholders. Africans Americans started to establish their own schools, churches and places in politics. President Johnson gave the former Confederates back their land, this included some of the land Sherman had promised to the African Americans. Many African American families settled on their promised land and argued that it should be theirs after working on it for so many years. Even through the families pleads, the Congress refused to concede upon the matter. The Freedman’s Bureau composed fair contracts between the land owners and the African American labor force. (MAPAH) Since the former slaves did not want to fall back into slave actions they did not work women or children, worked shorter hours and looked for the best terms. Families would cultivate pieces of land and divide the produce with the landowners, the better working conditions the landowner gave them, the better produce they would receive. The control from Republicans and African American public officials did not let the former Confederates to treat the workers as…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecroppers were people who agreed to maintain a person's crops in return for food and shelter. As a result of the boll weevil eating the crops, african americans did not get the return of food and shelter and most of them lost their jobs. For this reason is why hey had to migrate north. Even though there…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Likewise, nobody made convicts commit a crime, but in some instances it is understandable what led them to a life of crime. Sharecroppers were often poor and had few options in an economy entirely based on agriculture. Many convicts come from poverty stricken communities that already have a prevalence of crime. Furthermore, sharecropping, unlike slavery, was composed of both blacks and whites.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays