Winter Survival Exercise
Winter Survival Excersize
Bianka Solovan
David Chalmers
MHR 405 Sec. 091
12 November 2014 Throughout the group article exercise really did showcase who's personalities were strong and who's personalities were not. Having a strong personality means that you are willing to listen to other people's opinions but will debate on it by logical thinking of how you came across your answer rather than people with not so strong personalities meaning they agree with the group decisions. Through my personality, it will really show how I came across my conclusions, how the group came across their conclusions and how the group is influenced by the decisions made through the online assessments. Throughout each of the personality tests took this semester, there is not much surprise in accordance to the way the results came out. First, in the "Big Five" Test or also known as Five Factor Model for Personality Dimensions, the scores for each category (Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness to experience, and extroversion) are absolutely right. Conscientiousness is described as the way in which we control, regulate, and direct our impulses (IPIP-NEO, 2014). In this category, I scored 99/100 (high) which means that I am referred to as reliable and hard-working because I set clear goals and pursue them with determination. Agreeableness reflects individual differences in concern with cooperation and social harmony (IPIP-NEO, 2014). In this category, I scored 46/100 (average) which means that I have some concern with others needs but I am unwilling to sacrifice myself for others. Trust is an attribute that people are not just give but need to earn. Helping other people really does go a long a way it is an enjoyable thing, but when people decide to take advantage of that there is no sympathy. Neuroticism is described as a condition by mental distress, emotional suffering and an inability to cope effectively with normal demands of life (IPIP-NEO,
Bianka Solovan
David Chalmers
MHR 405 Sec. 091
12 November 2014 Throughout the group article exercise really did showcase who's personalities were strong and who's personalities were not. Having a strong personality means that you are willing to listen to other people's opinions but will debate on it by logical thinking of how you came across your answer rather than people with not so strong personalities meaning they agree with the group decisions. Through my personality, it will really show how I came across my conclusions, how the group came across their conclusions and how the group is influenced by the decisions made through the online assessments. Throughout each of the personality tests took this semester, there is not much surprise in accordance to the way the results came out. First, in the "Big Five" Test or also known as Five Factor Model for Personality Dimensions, the scores for each category (Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness to experience, and extroversion) are absolutely right. Conscientiousness is described as the way in which we control, regulate, and direct our impulses (IPIP-NEO, 2014). In this category, I scored 99/100 (high) which means that I am referred to as reliable and hard-working because I set clear goals and pursue them with determination. Agreeableness reflects individual differences in concern with cooperation and social harmony (IPIP-NEO, 2014). In this category, I scored 46/100 (average) which means that I have some concern with others needs but I am unwilling to sacrifice myself for others. Trust is an attribute that people are not just give but need to earn. Helping other people really does go a long a way it is an enjoyable thing, but when people decide to take advantage of that there is no sympathy. Neuroticism is described as a condition by mental distress, emotional suffering and an inability to cope effectively with normal demands of life (IPIP-NEO,
References: Article Provided in class Short Form for the IPIP-NEO (International Personality Item Pool Representation of the NEO PI-R™). (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2014. Steen, S., & McShane, S. (2012). Organizational Behaviour (Eight ed.).