Preview

SALES CASES

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
65323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
SALES CASES
1) Coronel vs. CA ( 263 SCRA 15)
ROMULO A. CORONEL, ALARICO A. CORONEL, ANNETTE A. CORONEL, ANNABELLE C. GONZALES (for herself and on behalf of Floraida C. Tupper, as attorney-in-fact), CIELITO A. CORONEL, FLORAIDA A. ALMONTE, and CATALINA BALAIS MABANAG, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, CONCEPCION D. ALCARAZ and RAMONA PATRICIA ALCARAZ, assisted by GLORIA F. NOEL as attorney-in-fact, respondents.
The petition before us has its roots in a complaint for specific performance to compel herein petitioners (except the last named, Catalina Balais Mabanag) to consummate the sale of a parcel of land with its improvements located along Roosevelt Avenue in Quezon City entered into by the parties sometime in January 1985 for the price of P1,240,000.00.The undisputed facts of the case were summarized by respondent court in this wise:On January 19, 1985, defendants-appellants Romulo Coronel, et. al. (hereinafter referred to as Coronels) executed a document entitled “Receipt of Down Payment” (Exh. “A”) in favor of plaintiff Ramona Patricia Alcaraz (hereinafter referred to as Ramona) which is reproduced hereunder:
RECEIPT OF DOWN PAYMENTP1,240,000.00 - Total amoun 50,000.00 - Down paymentP1,190,000.00 - Balance
Received from Miss Ramona Patricia Alcaraz of 146 Timog, Quezon City, the sum of Fifty Thousand Pesos purchase price of our inherited house and lot, covered by TCT No. 119627 of the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City, in the total amount of P1,240,000.00.We bind ourselves to effect the transfer in our names from our deceased father, Constancio P. Coronel, the transfer certificate of title immediately upon receipt of the down payment above-stated.On our presentation of the TCT already in or name, We will immediately execute the deed of absolute sale of said property and Miss Ramona Patricia Alcaraz shall immediately pay the balance of theP1,190,000.00.
Clearly, the conditions appurtenant to the sale are the following:1. Ramona will make a down payment of Fifty

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cases

    • 8232 Words
    • 33 Pages

    HILL, John Lyster - Disbarred by Consent on November 24, 2009 by the Court of Appeals for mishandling two (2) domestic relations cases in which he failed to take prompt action, he implied he had paid a judge to expedite his client’s case, failed to file an Information Report causing dismissal of his client’s appeal, and failed to deposit and maintain his client’s retainer in trust, in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(a), 1.15, 7.1(b) and 8.4(d), Maryland Rules 16-604 and 16-609 and Md. Code Ann., Business Occupations and Professions, §10-306.…

    • 8232 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper has paid attention to the case study of Mary who had acquired a house in 2010. She is the owner of 12 Pudding Lane, she had remunerated the amount of $50,000. With the help of the Showstopper Bank , she had the loan of $250,000 in order to fund the deposit. The first legal mortgage was given by Mary to the Showstopper Bank as the basic security of the property, but the remaining amount was left unpaid. This paper has paid attention to the recommendations of power of sale and possession of the bank.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    J.E.B. is the petitioner, the state of Alabama, (representing T.B. - an un-wed mother of a minor child), is the respondent. The petitioner’s claim is that, by striking men from his jury, Alabama violated his constitutional rights. According to the text, J.E.B. appealed to the U.S Supreme court since the Alabama State Supreme court denied, certiorari (which involves an order of a lower court to send the record of case to the Supreme Court).…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Property Law

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The property consisted of two apartments. Ms Kendra Abay owned 502B and Mr M Abay Snr bought 502A but not register. Ms K Fleetwood was the administrator of 502 A. Ms K Abay decided to sell the property as a whole. She asked Mr Herman, her twin brother and also the director of R T Edgar Toorak Pty Ltd, as the agent for selling the property.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Customer Service Cases

    • 1262 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My listening skills are reflective of the effective side of listening as to I comply with almost all of the characteristics in the chart of the effective listener.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sales Force Case

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Salesforce.com provides CRM and other software applications using the software-as-a-service business model over the Internet, which eliminates the need for companies to heavily invest in up-front hardware and software and reduces the time to implement new programs and maintain them. Subscribers to Salesforce.com only are required to pay a monthly user subscription fee and it will provide them with access to the Salesforce.com cloud through a standard Web browser or a mobile handheld device. Businesses using the Salesforce.com’s cloud have an easier time scaling their system as they increase or decrease their workforce, as the only adjustment needed is the number of subscriptions.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Housing Sale Contract

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2.3 If the seller might not perform the obligation of transferring registration of the detached house or assignment of the detached house, she shall compensate double of initial payment (\50,000,000*2=\100,000,000) in cash by HSBC.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the VENDOR, for and in consideration of the sum of _________________________________Philippine currency, to her in hand paid and receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby SELL, TRANSFER and CONVEY, by PACTO DE RETRO unto the said VENDEE, his heirs, and assigns, the above described parcel of land together with the one-storey concrete house and all the improvements found thereon, free from all liens and encumbrances whatsoever:…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mortgage Agreement

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IT IS ALSO FURTHER AGREED AND DECLARED by both parties that this Agreement be terminated after the Mortgagor pays the Mortgagee the mortgage amount of thirty thousand pesos only , with no interest rates, regardless of the length of time the mortgage amount is paid.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Digest Cases Oblicon

    • 20785 Words
    • 84 Pages

    OBLICON: EXTINGUISHMENT OF OBLIGATIONs  Payment or Performance 1. Montecillo vs. Reynes FACTS: Respondents Ignacia Reynes and Spouses Abucay filed on June 20, 1984 a complaint for Declaration of Nullity and Quieting of Title against petitioner Rido Montecillo. Reynes asserted that she is the owner of a lot situated in Mabolo, Cebu City containing an area of 448 square meters. In 1981, Reynes sold 185 square meters of the Mabolo Lot to the Abucay Spouses who built a residential house on the lot they bought. Reynes signed a Deed of Sale of the whole 448 square meters Mabolo Lot in favor of Montecillo on March 1, 1984. Montecillo promised to pay the agreed P47,000.00 purchase price within one month from the signing of the Deed of Sale. Montecillo failed to pay the purchase price after the lapse of the one-month period, prompting Reynes to demand from Montecillo the return of the Deed of Sale. Since Montecillo refused to return the Deed of Sale, Reynes executed a document unilaterally revoking the sale and gave a copy of the document to Montecillo. Subsequently, on May 23, 1984 Reynes signed a Deed of Sale transferring to the Abucay Spouses the entire Mabolo Lot, at the same time confirming the previous sale in 1981 of a 185-square meter portion of the lot. Respondents alleged that on June 18, 1984 they received information that the Register of Deeds of Cebu City issued Certificate of Title No. 90805 in the name of Montecillo for the Mabolo Lot. Respondents argued that “for lack of consideration there was no meeting of the minds” between Reynes and Montecillo. Thus, the trial court should declare null and void ab initio Montecillo’s Deed of Sale, and order the cancellation of Certificate of Title No. 90805 in the name of Montecillo. In his answer, Montecillo claimed he was a buyer in good faith and had actually paid the P47,000.00 consideration stated in his Deed of Sale. He, however, admitted he still owed Reynes a balance of P10,000.00. He also alleged that he paid…

    • 20785 Words
    • 84 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Cases Digested

    • 3060 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The petition is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the decision of the Regional Trial Court of Malolos, Bulacan is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The petitioner is ACQUITTED of…

    • 3060 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Digested Sales Cases

    • 4061 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Miguel Mapalo and Candida Quiba, simple illiterate farmers, were registered owners of a residential land in Manaoag, Pangasinan. Out of love and affection for Maximo Mapalo, Miguel’s brother who was about to get married, they decided to donate the eastern half of the land. However, they were deceived into signing a deed of absolute sale of the entire land on October 15, 1936. The document showed a consideration of P500, but the spouses actually did not receive anything. The spouses built a fence segregating the donated land. They continued to possess the western part up to the present. Not known to them, on March 15, 1938, Maximo registered the deed of sale in his favor and was able to obtain a TCT. On October 20, 1951, Maximo sold the entire land to the Narcisos, and a TCT was issued. The Narcisos took possession of the eastern part and filed a suit against Miguel and Candida, as well as Floro Guieb and Rosalia Mapalo Guieb who had a house on the western portion consented by the spouses. The spouses filed an answer with counterclaim, seeking cancellation of the TCT of the Narcisos on the ground that their consent to the deed of sale in favor of Maximo was obtained through fraud. The spouses also instituted a complaint to nullify the deeds of sale in 1936 and 1951. The trial court tried the case jointly. It ruled in favor of Miguel and Candida. The appellate court, however, reversed the judgment and rendered the sale valid on the ground of prescription. According to the appellate court, the sale is voidable and subject to annulment only within 4 years after discovery of fraud. It reckoned March 15, 1938, the date of registration, to be the reckoning period.…

    • 4061 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Specpro Case Digests

    • 7308 Words
    • 30 Pages

    DOLORES B. GUICO, ET AL., plaintiffs and appellants vs. PABLO G. BAUTISTA, ET. AL., defendants and appellees.…

    • 7308 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. For and in consideration of the use of the leased premises and above-mentioned equipment, the LESSEE hereby agrees to pay the LESSOR a monthly rental of EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (P85,000.00) for the first year of this Contract reckoned from the date of signing. The monthly rental shall be payable within the first five days of each month without need of demand at the office of the LESSOR. In case of delay in the payment of the said monthly rental, it shall earn interest at the rate of 3% per month on any or all delayed payments, provided that failure on the part of the LESSEE to pay rentals for two (2) successive months shall be a ground for the termination of this Contract without need of judicial action. The LESSEE likewise agrees to a yearly escalation rate of 10% on the monthly lease rental effective on the second year. (Emphasis and underscoring supplied).…

    • 15062 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ethics

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Before the Court is a petition for review on certiorari1 assailing the Decision2 dated October 31, 2007 and the Resolution dated June 6, 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 96279.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays