Preview

Rudy Giuliani's Speech Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1697 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rudy Giuliani's Speech Analysis
First, tone serves as a prima facie aspect of Rudy Giuliani’s speaking given that the sole purpose of his speech was to comfort the American public through the eyes of the United Nations. Essentially, Rudy Giuliani directs his speech towards the UN General Assembly as a symbol to adopt more counterterrorism measures in order to prevent attacks like 9/11 from occurring in the future. Despite him addressing the UN General Assembly, it seems as if he uses the United Nations to channel his message to the exterior world as a comforting measure to help America put an end to the period of grieving that followed the terrorist attacks. An example of this is clearly evident in the quote, “This was not just an attack on the City of New York or on the …show more content…
And though some of these rhetorical devices seem to be fallacious in nature, they serve as a catalyst in helping Giuliani convey his message of perseverance to the public. First, on numerous occasions, Giuliani develops his tone and emotional sympathy using imagery to paint a picture for the audience. An example of this imagery is evident in the quote, “The evidence of terrorism's brutality and inhumanity, of its contempt for life and the concept of peace is lying beneath the rubble of the World Trade Center, less than two miles from where we meet today” (Giuliani 2), where Giuliani employs a sympathetic tone combined with this rhetorical device to express his deepest condolences to all those affected. Rhetorical tactics like imagery allow Giuliani to substantiate his thesis using more pathos than logos given that his intent is to soothe the wounds of the people. Moreover, Giuliani also uses juxtaposition to authenticate his core message in a sense that allows him to gain popularity amongst the audience using artificial, yet …show more content…
Although on some occasions Giuliani does employ a series of logical appeals, most of his messages seem to be more emotionally based in order to captivate the audience in comprehending when the time for action and retaliation is. On the logical aspects of his speech, Giuliani makes various suggestions to the UN General Assembly that counterterrorism measures must be adopted on a global scale to prevent attacks like this from ever occurring. Moreover, this speaks to the fundamental political aspects of Giuliani’s position because his oration essentially becomes an advocacy for sweeping defense reform in all of the world’s gateways. Additionally, Giuliani continues his activism in showing his support for shutting off the economic foundations of terrorist organizations. Giuliani’s logical stance on terrorist funding is explained by the quote, “By taking away their ability to mass large amounts of money, you take away their ability to have others carry on their functioning for them even if they're removed, arrested, prosecuted, or eliminated through war or through law enforcement” (Giuliani 3). But amidst all of the logical appeals Giuliani conveys to the audience, his speech is targeted to the audience more by emotional appeals. Through his tone and rhetorical devices, Giuliani understands that his role as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trump begins his speech by expressing his support for the CIA. He talks about how “This is my first stop”(pg 1 para 1). He also emphasizes how important they are by pointing out that he had other places he could have gone such as balls or other speeches. Trump also makes an easily refutable statement somewhat of a Strawman when he says “Almost everyone in this room voted for me”(pg 1 para 5). Trump also talks about how Himself and the CIA are on the same page, and want the same things. Trump on the same note of being on the same page talks about how we need to “get rid of ISIS, We need to get rid of ISIS”(pg 1 para 8) Trump uses repetition to get his point across that they both want the same things.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ASHINGTON -- Sen. Rand Paul shifted his tone from apology to condemnation Wednesday as he continued to face fallout from alleged plagiarism in numerous speeches and articles.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the opening paragraph of Bush’s address he uses pathos the most and he does very effectively. A great example is when he put together the words “victims”,”moms and dads”, and “friends and neighbors”. He also uses the phrases “mass murders” and ‘attack” to make you feel scared. His creative usage of “our” as a pathos and ethos saying it 5 times makes us think that he is apart of the people and he lost apart of him too that day like…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In George W. Bush’s Columbia Speech the speaker uses tone and a pathos appeal to accomplish in soothing the country after a terrible accident. The president’s tone throughout his speech is very somber and very sad for the majority of the speech. “Our entire nation grieves with you. And those you loved will have the respect and gratitude of this country.” He is very sad that the astronauts on the Columbia died. The president also appeals the nation's pathos ideals by taking verses out of the bible and talking about God “May God bless the grieving families. And may -- may God continue to bless America.” Using this two things the president sends home the fact that he and the rest of the country are grieving for the men and women in died in the Columbia Tragedy.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the Bernie Sanders rally, he used a variety of techniques while presenting to the group. I noticed when he hit key talking points in his argument; he would use his hands that would elicit a stronger reaction from the crowd. He read his audience demographics well by hitting on housing cost, minimum wage and the high cost of tuition (all very important concerns of college students). However, there were some points he made I felt to be confusing. At one point in his speech, he mentioned how Native Americans were taken advantage of in the past. He tried to say that we should follow the Native American’s lessons and live with nature (and not destroy it with fossil fuel and natural gas exploration). It seemed he used a fallacy to connect two…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Edward Snowden is trying to use rhetoric to convince his audience that the programs he revealed are un-American and morally wrong, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie uses it to make the opposite case. He employs similar appeals to authority and emotion to convince Republican voters, a more targeted subset of the general American population that Snowden is appealing to, that these programs are necessary for national security and that they should elect him President because he would use them most effectively. To gain a better perspective on the types of rhetorical strategies he uses to make this argument, consider his exchange with Senator Rand Paul at the first Republican primary debate.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Following that day, every word he uttered to the mass media was analyzed. For example, the commitment of some European countries to the fight against al Qaeda was tested when he warned them, “As you spoil our security, we will do so to you...Your security is in your own hands. Any nation that does not attack us will not be attacked.”8 Suddenly, his message reached an entire globe that listened to every word he uttered even as he became more personally isolated.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama utilizes pathos in his descriptions of the harm and pain that the American public has endured when he gives the examples, “the empty seat at the dinner table. Children who were forced to grow up without their mother or their father. Parents who would never know the feeling of their child's embrace.” This quote relies entirely on pathos, and evokes an emotional response towards the horrors committed by Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Through his use of pathos, Obama reminds America that the actions of Al Qaeda can still be felt today, and conveys the sense that it is not only those who lost loved ones who continue to face this tragedy, but all Americans together. He goes on to say that on the day of the attack “the American people came together. We offered our neighbors a hand, and we offered the wounded our blood…[we] united in our resolve to protect our nation and to bring those who committed this vicious attack to justice.” In this quote, President Obama gives examples of the American people coming together and uniting in the face of terrorism. This uses pathos by appealing to the listener’s emotions and memory of the aftereffects of the attack. Therefore, Obama once again reveals the destruction that the terroir attack caused, but calls on the American people to fight fear with unity and justice. Overall,…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Bush delivered his speech for the 9/11 attack, some people would not have noticed that he was using Rhetorical devices while he was writing the speech and when he delivered it to the nation in the time of crisis. The five used in his speech were Sender(Ethos), Message, Emotional Strategies(Pathos), Logical Strategies (Logos), and Language (Ethos,Pathos,Logos) while delivering and having the people of America receive it in the way they needed it to be delivered to them to know that everything was going to be alright. So in this paper, we are going to analyze the speech he gave on 9/11.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the twin towers fell and condensed to rubble on September 11, 2001, the Bush administration quickly formulated a plan to maintain the nation’s sense of national safety and security. John Lewis Gaddis summarized the administration’s directions to the public when he wrote, “Bush requested, and only partially received, what amounted to a global police action against terrorism, combined with a call for vigilance at home and abroad, combined with the suggestion that, despite what had happened, Americans should carry on with their ordinary lives” (Gaddis at 37). The citizens were to follow the example of former British politician Sir Winston Churchill; Bush believed the nation would best react to the crisis by applying Churchill’s words to their lives- the nation need to “keep calm and carry on” (Gale Biography In Context) while the administration began gathering intelligence and plotting their retaliation. In contrast to average citizens, Bush outlined what was later named The Bush Doctrine which said, “that the United States will identify and eliminate terrorists wherever they are, together with the regimes that sustain them” (Gaddis at 86). This meant the focus of the nation now weighed equally on the defensive and offensive sides of the scale. The Bush Doctrine outlines three core principles: preemption, unilateralism, and hegemony (Gaddis at 16, 22, 16). The United States has historically maintained defense for its people by eliminating or containing possible threats and if a threat becomes a reality, the nation retaliates, as it did following the bombing of Pearl Harbor. After 9/11, the government gained the authority to use surveillance and monitor communication through phones and the internet in order to avoid any other attacks of the same nature. In addition, “The administration also detained more than 600 possible suspects and announced it might use military tribunals to try alleged foreign terrorists” (Masci and Marshall). Despite the numerous…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack Brooks

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During national disasters the public tends to rally-‘round-the-flag and their leaders (Glen), this was especially evident in the aftermath of the disastrous September, 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. After 9/11 the nation was distraught and the public was in need of some sought of reassurance. President Bush took that opportunity become the publics reassurance by using statements such as: “any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime,” and “Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists” (Kam and Kinder, 325). These statements appealed to many Americans sense of ethnocentrism, and consequently the President was able to shift policies and shift around priorities and policies, and take action with the majority of the publics’ approval (Kam and Kinder, 325). Not only did the disaster increase in President Bush, it also made President Bush the most liked President than any of his immediate predecessor at that point in Presidency (Kam and Kinder, 326). In subsequent of 9/11 it is evident that a horrible disaster became a great opportunity for a President to gain the liking and support of the people, through the fear and ethnocentrism of the citizens. This type of disaster turned opportunity for a leader is not unique to 9/11. Following the Pearl Harbor and the time hostages were seized in…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This speech began as epideictic, with a brief mention of his condolences for the families and the lives lost, and included a moment of silence. However, the remainder of his speech turned to a more deliberative type of oratory, which is also known as political rhetoric. This type of rhetorical setting addresses topics such as war and peace, national defense, trade, and legislation, to assess what is harmful and beneficial (Herrick, 2016). During his speech, Trump delivered self-congratulatory comments, political attacks, and strove to instill fear of terrorism. His speech was used an opportunity to spread suspicion and to frame himself as uniquely positioned to make the country safer. There was no sincere outreach to the American public, and the facts he presented did not appear to match the rhetoric.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Striking language is a powerful tool when used effectively. Politicians must carefully plan their diction to avoid having their words and ideas misinterpreted. With this in mind, Mayor Mitch Landrieu, of New Orleans, recently gave an address before the controversial removing of a monument to Confederate general Robert E. Lee. In his speech, Mayor Landrieu has to justify and explain in a way that will not cause major ripples on either side of the issue. To achieve this, he brings in quotes, facts, and historical connections to voice his stance.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership by Giuliani

    • 3339 Words
    • 14 Pages

    3. Understandably, the events of September 11, 2001 affected Mr. Giuliani more than any other experience in his life. Mr. Giuliani states that he was prepared to handle the events of that fateful day because of the leadership he used throughout his tenure as Mayor of New York City as well as previous positions held in life.…

    • 3339 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Precis Examples

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nicholas Kristof, in his article “The Healers of 9/11” (September, 11, 2010), asserts that there is a better way to respond to terrorist attacks like the example set by women who have made “the most unexpected and inspiring American response to the 9/11 attacks.” Kristof supports this assertion by illustrating the example of Susan Retik, a Jewish woman who lost her husband in the 9/11 attacks, who is recruiting members of the mosque to join her battle against poverty and illiteracy in Afghanistan” instead of “planning to remember the day with hatred”, comparing the responses of Retik and Quigley, who “turned to education and poverty-alleviation projects”, to that of the U.S. government, who “reacted to the horror of 9/11 mostly with missiles and bombs, detentions and waterboarding”, and by “reflecting the moral and mental toughness that truly can chip away at terrorism.”His purpose is to inform the audience that by responding positive to a violent act we are eliminating evil instead of creating more of it as if we were to respond negatively. He constructs a formal relationship with his audience of people affected by the attacks who are feeling hatred towards the terrorist and to people who are facing other violent acts in order to show us that we can truly change the world if we focus on doing more good things than bad things even in the worst situations.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays